Only
Only

Only

Do Not
Do Not

Do Not

Have
Have

Have

Are
Are

Are

These
These

These

Detectives
Detectives

Detectives

Its
Its

Its

When Your
When Your

When Your

From
From

From

The
The

The

🔥 | Latest

Fucking, Head, and Iphone: Kat BlaqueX @kat_blaque I've been raped several times in my life and I cannot describe the genitalia of my rapists. I wasn't thinking about that. I was shocked that it was even happening to me. That human beings can be that fucking cruel and careless. What their dick looked like didn't cross my mind. Jason Campbell @JasonSCampbell 18h Ben Shapiro dismisses allegations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh with "Nobody has yet described Kavanaugh's [genitalia]" TeE 0:33/1:19 BEN PIRO SH 4.2M views Kat Blaque @kat_blaque Idon't wish rape on anyone but sometimes I wish these men, because it's almost always men, understood what goes through your head when you're being raped. You often can't even comprehend what's happening to you and you almost immediately don't want to talk about it 8:46 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone Kat Blaque @kat_blaque And when it's happening you wonder if the consequences of fighting back are even worth it. Maybe it's just better that you let it happen because if someone can do this to you, what's stopping them from actually killing you? Where exactly is the line with them? 8:48 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone > Kat Blaque @kat_blaque literally cannot comprehend rape as It's like these men a violation. They must always somehow make it about sex and whether or not the sex was enjoyable. It's so depraved to me. Almost like they personally do not know the difference. I fear for their partners 8:49 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone whyyoustabbedme: 0fucs: uncommonbish: describe rapist genitalia?? what the hell….. maybe victims need to name rapist’s fav color? or name his first pet??? These creatures don’t have souls. fucking perverts
Fucking, Head, and Iphone: Kat BlaqueX
 @kat_blaque
 I've been raped several times in my life and I cannot
 describe the genitalia of my rapists. I wasn't thinking
 about that. I was shocked that it was even happening to
 me. That human beings can be that fucking cruel and
 careless. What their dick looked like didn't cross my
 mind.
 Jason Campbell @JasonSCampbell 18h
 Ben Shapiro dismisses allegations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh with
 "Nobody has yet described Kavanaugh's [genitalia]"
 TeE
 0:33/1:19 BEN PIRO
 SH
 4.2M views

 Kat Blaque
 @kat_blaque
 Idon't wish rape on anyone but sometimes I wish these
 men, because it's almost always men, understood what
 goes through your head when you're being raped. You
 often can't even comprehend what's happening to you
 and you almost immediately don't want to talk about it
 8:46 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone

 Kat Blaque
 @kat_blaque
 And when it's happening you wonder if the
 consequences of fighting back are even worth it. Maybe
 it's just better that you let it happen because if
 someone can do this to you, what's stopping them from
 actually killing you? Where exactly is the line with
 them?
 8:48 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone
 >

 Kat Blaque
 @kat_blaque
 literally cannot comprehend rape as
 It's like these men
 a violation. They must always somehow make it about
 sex and whether or not the sex was enjoyable. It's so
 depraved to me. Almost like they personally do not
 know the difference. I fear for their partners
 8:49 PM Sep 16, 2019 Twitter for iPhone
whyyoustabbedme:

0fucs:

uncommonbish:

describe rapist genitalia?? what the hell….. maybe victims need to name rapist’s fav color? or name his first pet??? 

These creatures don’t have souls.

fucking perverts

whyyoustabbedme: 0fucs: uncommonbish: describe rapist genitalia?? what the hell….. maybe victims need to name rapist’s fav color? or name...

Tumblr, Beach, and Blog: raegeii: Lab partners at the beach, drawn in may 2018 as a part of this set. ☞ patreon.com/raegeii
Tumblr, Beach, and Blog: raegeii:

Lab partners at the beach, drawn in may 2018 as a part of this set.

☞ patreon.com/raegeii

raegeii: Lab partners at the beach, drawn in may 2018 as a part of this set. ☞ patreon.com/raegeii

Beautiful, Definitely, and Gif: @raegeii- Aug 12 Rae Geiger #unofficial #fanart back in 2017 when we were working on princess prom wanted to design prom outfits for two of my favs who didnt get them, even though one of them was definitely not invited to prom 113 t1.5K 5.7K Retweeted t Rae Geiger aaron@lordbilingual Aug 11 oh my god they were lab partners...ntrapdak #SheRa Josie Campbell @CozyJamble Aug 12 Replying to @raegeii I think this was the first drawing you ever taped to my door! I ADORE IT!! 2 26 @raegeii Aug 12 Rae Geiger I was on my bullshit from the START 28 1 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble Aug 12 Day 1,I didn't know you, but I DID know Entrapta was a woman who deserves to be in spats, with a dressy bf! THUS A FRIENDSHIP WAS BORN 28 t1 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble 4h IT IS ALWAYS ENOUGH DAYS TO TALK ABOUT ENTRAPDAK! [excited laughter GIF 1 26 1 FlameCon K92 @kateleth - 4h Kate Leth It's so GOOD 1 6 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble 4h As the main architect of this ship on the script side of the show, this is imperfect, beautiful music to my ears 1 17 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble Replying to @kateleth Throwing props to @Sizzlemanski who boarded a HUGE amount of Entrapta, and also specifically that gorgeous "imperfection" sequence with her being backlit and Hordak losing his damn mind! 1:56 PM Aug 14, 2019 Twitter for iPhone 15 Likes Sam szymanski @Sizzlemanski 2h Replying to@CozyJamble and @kateleth It was such a joy boarding the stuff we got from you and the writers! shout out to @Dwooman_art for doing the final boards after my roughs for that scene and turning it into an absolutely beautiful moment! 2 8 iamtypinglike98madmen: There’s just something so wonderful about seeing the show’s crew celebrate Entrapdak 
Beautiful, Definitely, and Gif: @raegeii- Aug 12
 Rae Geiger
 #unofficial #fanart back in 2017 when we were working on princess prom
 wanted to design prom outfits for two of my favs who didnt get them, even
 though one of them was definitely not invited to prom
 113
 t1.5K
 5.7K
 Retweeted
 t Rae Geiger
 aaron@lordbilingual Aug 11
 oh my god they were lab partners...ntrapdak #SheRa

 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble Aug 12
 Replying to @raegeii
 I think this was the first drawing you ever taped to my door! I ADORE IT!!
 2
 26
 @raegeii Aug 12
 Rae Geiger
 I was on my bullshit from the START
 28
 1
 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble Aug 12
 Day 1,I didn't know you, but I DID know Entrapta was a woman who deserves
 to be in spats, with a dressy bf! THUS A FRIENDSHIP WAS BORN
 28
 t1

 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble 4h
 IT IS ALWAYS ENOUGH DAYS TO TALK ABOUT ENTRAPDAK!
 [excited laughter
 GIF
 1
 26
 1
 FlameCon K92
 @kateleth - 4h
 Kate Leth
 It's so GOOD
 1
 6
 Josie Campbell @CozyJamble 4h
 As the main architect of this ship on the script side of the show, this is
 imperfect, beautiful music to my ears
 1
 17

 Josie Campbell
 @CozyJamble
 Replying to @kateleth
 Throwing props to @Sizzlemanski who boarded a
 HUGE amount of Entrapta, and also specifically that
 gorgeous "imperfection" sequence with her being
 backlit and Hordak losing his damn mind!
 1:56 PM Aug 14, 2019 Twitter for iPhone
 15 Likes
 Sam szymanski @Sizzlemanski 2h
 Replying to@CozyJamble and @kateleth
 It was such a joy boarding the stuff we got from you and the writers!
 shout out to @Dwooman_art for doing the final boards after my roughs for
 that scene and turning it into an absolutely beautiful moment!
 2
 8
iamtypinglike98madmen:

There’s just something so wonderful about seeing the show’s crew celebrate Entrapdak 

iamtypinglike98madmen: There’s just something so wonderful about seeing the show’s crew celebrate Entrapdak 

Hype, Tumblr, and Blog: squeeneyart: and they were LAB PARTNERS i want them to be morally dubious lab partners ready to hype each other at any given moment forever
Hype, Tumblr, and Blog: squeeneyart:

and they were LAB PARTNERS
i want them to be morally dubious lab partners ready to hype each other at any given moment forever

squeeneyart: and they were LAB PARTNERS i want them to be morally dubious lab partners ready to hype each other at any given moment forever...

Love, Tumblr, and Wow: We gonna talk about how being raised in a dysfunctional household causes you to choose horrible romantic partnerS? BC I have time 5/25/17, 1:49 PM 3,821 Retweets 6,816 Like:s YT: Nu Mindframe O @nu.... 5/25/17 Replying to @nu_mindframe And l'm not just speaking on physical child abuse here. Emotional child abuse is just as harmful 460 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17 v Raised in a household where you were constantly emotionally neglected? Most likely you turned into a people pleaser and attention seeker 9 ,934 y2,291 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu... 5/25/17 You'd think that you'd choose a mate who can meet your emotional needs right? One who'll love you the way you need to be loved right? Wrong 523 1,155 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17 Instead you're attracted to emotionally unavailable ppl. Ppl who you have to cater to. Bc that's the only type of love you've ever known 7 01,022 2,211 YT: Nu Mindframe O @nu.... 5/25/17 Ppl who are too nice to you and want to love you are actually a turn off to you They feel foreign to you and you immediately reject them 6 0935 2,265 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu... 5/25/17 If you're not fighting for that love and then the relationship feels off. Even if you settle down with a nice person guess what happens 509 1,379 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17 You start to pick unnecessary fights Push their buttons. Getting a negative response from them is the only way they can show you they care 5 0615 1,613 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.. 5/25/17 When things are going too smoothly you have to sabotage the relationship. You feel threatened by peace bc you've never experienced it 763 1,874 E jaded-misfits: whateveriblogis: wow. she unloaded the whole clip Why y'all so loud for
Love, Tumblr, and Wow: We gonna talk about how being raised
 in a dysfunctional household causes
 you to choose horrible romantic
 partnerS? BC I have time
 5/25/17, 1:49 PM
 3,821 Retweets 6,816 Like:s
 YT: Nu Mindframe O @nu.... 5/25/17
 Replying to @nu_mindframe
 And l'm not just speaking on physical
 child abuse here. Emotional child abuse
 is just as harmful
 460
 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17 v
 Raised in a household where you were
 constantly emotionally neglected? Most
 likely you turned into a people pleaser
 and attention seeker
 9
 ,934
 y2,291

 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu... 5/25/17
 You'd think that you'd choose a mate
 who can meet your emotional needs
 right? One who'll love you the way you
 need to be loved right? Wrong
 523
 1,155
 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17
 Instead you're attracted to emotionally
 unavailable ppl. Ppl who you have to
 cater to. Bc that's the only type of love
 you've ever known
 7
 01,022
 2,211
 YT: Nu Mindframe O @nu.... 5/25/17
 Ppl who are too nice to you and want to
 love you are actually a turn off to you
 They feel foreign to you and you
 immediately reject them
 6
 0935
 2,265
 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu... 5/25/17
 If you're not fighting for that love and
 then the relationship feels off. Even if
 you settle down with a nice person guess
 what happens
 509
 1,379

 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.... 5/25/17
 You start to pick unnecessary fights
 Push their buttons. Getting a negative
 response from them is the only way they
 can show you they care
 5
 0615 1,613
 YT: Nu Mindframe @nu.. 5/25/17
 When things are going too smoothly you
 have to sabotage the relationship. You
 feel threatened by peace bc you've never
 experienced it
 763 1,874 E
jaded-misfits:
whateveriblogis:
wow. she unloaded the whole clip

Why y'all so loud for

jaded-misfits: whateveriblogis: wow. she unloaded the whole clip Why y'all so loud for

Child Support, Community, and Fucking: Chronic Sex @ChronicSexChat Chronic Sex *Psst* Marriage equality doesn't exist anywhere unless disabled people can marry without losing their benefits Pass it orn 5/21/18, 7:03 AM actualmythicalcreature: somecunttookmyurl: tyse-has-unpopular-opinions: juxtapoesition: oistrong: I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem. W…wait Thats a thing???? Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be. If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married. But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut. For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0% In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married. I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out! https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/06/29/op-ed-why-no-matter-what-i-still-cant-marry-my-girlfriend I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell. Disabled people in the UK do not have marriage equality. If you so much as LIVE with a partner you lose a massive chunk of income Disabled Canadian chiming in - it’s the same here. I can even be kicked off disability for living with a romantic partner for longer than 6 months because then I’m considered common-law, and said partners income is deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits. Things like alimony, spousal support, and child support are also deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits - so you also get in shit for having previous relationships. If I have a roommate, they can request I PROVE that I’m not in a relationship with them by getting character references to swear it. Essentially, anyone whose unlucky enough to love me, is considered my financial caretaker. It fucking sucks.
Child Support, Community, and Fucking: Chronic Sex
 @ChronicSexChat
 Chronic Sex
 *Psst*
 Marriage equality doesn't exist
 anywhere unless disabled people can
 marry without losing their benefits
 Pass it orn
 5/21/18, 7:03 AM
actualmythicalcreature:
somecunttookmyurl:


tyse-has-unpopular-opinions:

juxtapoesition:


oistrong:
I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem.

W…wait Thats a thing????


Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be. 
If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married. 
But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut. 
For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0%
In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married. 
I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out!
https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/06/29/op-ed-why-no-matter-what-i-still-cant-marry-my-girlfriend
I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell. 


Disabled people in the UK do not have marriage equality.

If you so much as LIVE with a partner you lose a massive chunk of income 


Disabled Canadian chiming in - it’s the same here. I can even be kicked off disability for living with a romantic partner for longer than 6 months because then I’m considered common-law, and said partners income is deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits. Things like alimony, spousal support, and child support are also deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits - so you also get in shit for having previous relationships. If I have a roommate, they can request I PROVE that I’m not in a relationship with them by getting character references to swear it. Essentially, anyone whose unlucky enough to love me, is considered my financial caretaker. It fucking sucks.

actualmythicalcreature: somecunttookmyurl: tyse-has-unpopular-opinions: juxtapoesition: oistrong: I’m all for fighting for marriage equ...

Bad, Books, and Clothes: he Swiss are voting on a plan to end poverty forever. Step one: give every adult $33,600 a year, no strings attached. There is no step two. Photo: Flickr/twicepix fangirltothefullest: tank-grrl: hello-missmayhem: cptprocrastination: doomhamster: belcanta: nikkidubs: attentiondeficitaptitude: belcanta: Guaranteed basic income to every citizen, whether or not they are employed to ensure their survival and that they live in a dignified, humane way, preventing poverty, illness, homelessness, reducing crime, encouraging higher education and learning vocations as well as helping society become more prosperous as a whole.  Wow. Forget raising the minimum wage. This is much much better idea. The minimum wage could actually drop if we had basic income. But Americans would never go for it. Miserably slogging through 12 hour days and having businesses open 24/7 is too engrained in our culture. “BUT WHERE WILL THE GOVERNMENT GET THE MONEY?” screamed Joe Schmoe, slamming a meaty fist onto the table and getting mouth-froth all over the front of his greying tank top. “You libt*rds all think money grows on TREES!! HAHA!”“But where will people get the incentive to work?!” Mindy Bindy cried, flapping her hands in front of her face. She’d had a fear of the unemployed lollygagging about ever since she was a child and her mother told her to be afraid of the unemployed lollygagging about. “You think people should get paid for nothing? I work hard for my money!” “But who will serve me?” grumbled Marty McMoneybags. “Who will make me feel important? Who will do my laundry and cook my food and stand in front of me wearing a plastic smile while I take out all my stress—because I do have a lot of stress, you know, being this rich is stressful—on them?” He paused and straightened out the piles of hundred dollar bills on the desk in front of him, then raised his two watery, outraged eyes up to the Heavens. “Lord, if there are no poor people, how will I know that I’m rich??” I laughed. This is perfect! Well said! The thing is, while I’m sure you could scrape up a few people who’d be willing to just float by on a guaranteed minimum income? For most people the choice to work would be a no-brainer. “Hmmm. I can get by on 33k a year, or I can take that part time job and make 48k… enough to move to a better apartment, maybe take the family on vacation. Sold.” Hell, most people would want to work simply because it gives one a sense of dignity and something to do with one’s time. (Speaking as someone who’s been unemployed, on extended sick leave, etc. in her time, the boredom and sense of isolation that comes with not having a job is almost as bad as the humiliation of having to depend on other people for one’s survival.) And with this system, part-time jobs and “non-skilled” jobs would be much more readily available because nobody would need to work two or three jobs just to stay afloat! Which would ALSO mean that employers and customers couldn’t shamelessly exploit employees the way they can today, because if losing a job weren’t necessarily a financial disaster, more people would be willing to walk out on jobs where they weren’t being treated with dignity. And if this also applies to students (and it should) then student loans would become much less of a problem, and fewer people would flunk out of school because of having to juggle studies and work. Far fewer people would be forced to stay with abusive partners, parents or roommates because they couldn’t afford to move out. And the thing is, all those people who suddenly had money? They’d be spending it. They’d be getting all the stuff they can’t afford now - new clothes, books, toys, locally-produced food, car repairs - and with each purchase money would flow BACK to the government, because VAT, also income tax. The unemployed and/or disabled wouldn’t need special support any more - which would also mean the government could fire however many admins who are currently engaged in humiliating - *cough* making sure those people aren’t getting money they don’t deserve. Same for medical benefits and pensions. And I’m no legal scholar, but I somehow imagine less financial desperation would lead to less petty crime, and hence less need for police and security everywhere? TL;DR Doomie thinks this is a good idea, laughs at those who protest. reblogging for more top commentary They tried something like this out in Canada as a sort of social experiment, called Mincome. What they found was that, on the whole, people continued to work about as much as they did before. Only new mothers and teenagers worked substantially less hours.  But wait, there’s more. Because parents were spending just a little more time at home and involved with their families, test scores increased. Because teens didn’t have to work to support their families, drop-out rates decreased. Crime rates, hospital visits, psychiatric hospitalizations and domestic abuse rates all dropped, as well. More adults pursued higher education. Those who continued to work reported more job flexibility and more opportunity to choose employment they preferred. Basically, now you can go prove to your asshole family members that society won’t collapse without poor people for you to feel better than. The picture is awesome, but read the commentary, that’s what I’m reblogging for. The only reason people are against this is because when people are financially stable there is less crime (therefore less prison industrial complex free labour) there are less medical problems (IE less hospital visits meaning less money for the medical and pharmaceutical companies) and the point I am making is that a full guaranteed income to all means that those wealthy people at the top get less money and so they try and fool you into thinking it’s bad so you help encourage them lining their pockets.
Bad, Books, and Clothes: he Swiss are voting on a plan to end poverty forever.
 Step one: give every adult $33,600
 a year, no strings attached.
 There is no step two.
 Photo: Flickr/twicepix
fangirltothefullest:

tank-grrl:

hello-missmayhem:

cptprocrastination:

doomhamster:

belcanta:

nikkidubs:

attentiondeficitaptitude:

belcanta:

Guaranteed basic income to every citizen, whether or not they are employed to ensure their survival and that they live in a dignified, humane way, preventing poverty, illness, homelessness, reducing crime, encouraging higher education and learning vocations as well as helping society become more prosperous as a whole. 

Wow. Forget raising the minimum wage. This is much much better idea.
The minimum wage could actually drop if we had basic income.
But Americans would never go for it. Miserably slogging through 12 hour days and having businesses open 24/7 is too engrained in our culture.

“BUT WHERE WILL THE GOVERNMENT GET THE MONEY?” screamed Joe Schmoe, slamming a meaty fist onto the table and getting mouth-froth all over the front of his greying tank top. “You libt*rds all think money grows on TREES!! HAHA!”“But where will people get the incentive to work?!” Mindy Bindy cried, flapping her hands in front of her face. She’d had a fear of the unemployed lollygagging about ever since she was a child and her mother told her to be afraid of the unemployed lollygagging about. “You think people should get paid for nothing? I work hard for my money!”
“But who will serve me?” grumbled Marty McMoneybags. “Who will make me feel important? Who will do my laundry and cook my food and stand in front of me wearing a plastic smile while I take out all my stress—because I do have a lot of stress, you know, being this rich is stressful—on them?” He paused and straightened out the piles of hundred dollar bills on the desk in front of him, then raised his two watery, outraged eyes up to the Heavens. “Lord, if there are no poor people, how will I know that I’m rich??”

I laughed. This is perfect! Well said!

The thing is, while I’m sure you could scrape up a few people who’d be willing to just float by on a guaranteed minimum income? For most people the choice to work would be a no-brainer. “Hmmm. I can get by on 33k a year, or I can take that part time job and make 48k… enough to move to a better apartment, maybe take the family on vacation. Sold.” Hell, most people would want to work simply because it gives one a sense of dignity and something to do with one’s time. (Speaking as someone who’s been unemployed, on extended sick leave, etc. in her time, the boredom and sense of isolation that comes with not having a job is almost as bad as the humiliation of having to depend on other people for one’s survival.)
And with this system, part-time jobs and “non-skilled” jobs would be much more readily available because nobody would need to work two or three jobs just to stay afloat!
Which would ALSO mean that employers and customers couldn’t shamelessly exploit employees the way they can today, because if losing a job weren’t necessarily a financial disaster, more people would be willing to walk out on jobs where they weren’t being treated with dignity.
And if this also applies to students (and it should) then student loans would become much less of a problem, and fewer people would flunk out of school because of having to juggle studies and work.
Far fewer people would be forced to stay with abusive partners, parents or roommates because they couldn’t afford to move out.
And the thing is, all those people who suddenly had money? They’d be spending it. They’d be getting all the stuff they can’t afford now - new clothes, books, toys, locally-produced food, car repairs - and with each purchase money would flow BACK to the government, because VAT, also income tax.
The unemployed and/or disabled wouldn’t need special support any more - which would also mean the government could fire however many admins who are currently engaged in humiliating - *cough* making sure those people aren’t getting money they don’t deserve. Same for medical benefits and pensions. And I’m no legal scholar, but I somehow imagine less financial desperation would lead to less petty crime, and hence less need for police and security everywhere?
TL;DR Doomie thinks this is a good idea, laughs at those who protest.

reblogging for more top commentary

They tried something like this out in Canada as a sort of social experiment, called Mincome. What they found was that, on the whole, people continued to work about as much as they did before. Only new mothers and teenagers worked substantially less hours. 
But wait, there’s more. Because parents were spending just a little more time at home and involved with their families, test scores increased. Because teens didn’t have to work to support their families, drop-out rates decreased. Crime rates, hospital visits, psychiatric hospitalizations and domestic abuse rates all dropped, as well. More adults pursued higher education. Those who continued to work reported more job flexibility and more opportunity to choose employment they preferred.
Basically, now you can go prove to your asshole family members that society won’t collapse without poor people for you to feel better than.

The picture is awesome, but read the commentary, that’s what I’m reblogging for.

The only reason people are against this is because when people are financially stable there is less crime (therefore less prison industrial complex free labour) there are less medical problems (IE less hospital visits meaning less money for the medical and pharmaceutical companies) and the point I am making is that a full guaranteed income to all means that those wealthy people at the top get less money and so they try and fool you into thinking it’s bad so you help encourage them lining their pockets.

fangirltothefullest: tank-grrl: hello-missmayhem: cptprocrastination: doomhamster: belcanta: nikkidubs: attentiondeficitaptitude: be...

Bad, Cheating, and Life: Why Cheating Isn't Actually That Bad Ima count to 3 and that shit better be deleted yellowjuice: tijopi11: Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever but the article wasn’t encouraging cheating, where you go behind your partners back, but instead looking at the issue of cheating as a not black-and-white thing where there’s one horribly evil person who just wanted to have fun/get laid with one traumatized-for-life victim. Instead, like most- nah, let me say with ANYTHING in real life beyond fiction, the article sees the grays in cheating and why the person cheated in the first place. Not to say that cheating isn’t a horrible thing to do, but I feel like people need to understand that there are reasons people do the things they do. People who cheat are human beings. They could feel horrible about it, they could be trapped in a marriage or relationship that they don’t feel they can escape, they can feel insecure and unloved. Again, not to say it’s something you should ever do, but dehumanizing someone over a mistake is just as bad in my opinion. There’s nowhere where they can talk about their experiences, and it’s likely we know a lot of people who have cheated in our lives even if they haven’t (or were too scared) to tell us about it.  “dehumanizing someone over a mistake”
Bad, Cheating, and Life: Why Cheating Isn't Actually That Bad

 Ima count to 3
 and that shit better
 be deleted
yellowjuice:

tijopi11:
Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever but the article wasn’t encouraging cheating, where you go behind your partners back, but instead looking at the issue of cheating as a not black-and-white thing where there’s one horribly evil person who just wanted to have fun/get laid with one traumatized-for-life victim. Instead, like most- nah, let me say with ANYTHING in real life beyond fiction, the article sees the grays in cheating and why the person cheated in the first place. Not to say that cheating isn’t a horrible thing to do, but I feel like people need to understand that there are reasons people do the things they do. People who cheat are human beings. They could feel horrible about it, they could be trapped in a marriage or relationship that they don’t feel they can escape, they can feel insecure and unloved. Again, not to say it’s something you should ever do, but dehumanizing someone over a mistake is just as bad in my opinion. There’s nowhere where they can talk about their experiences, and it’s likely we know a lot of people who have cheated in our lives even if they haven’t (or were too scared) to tell us about it. 
“dehumanizing someone over a mistake”

yellowjuice: tijopi11: Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever...

Bad, Cheating, and Life: Why Cheating Isn't Actually That Bad Ima count to 3 and that shit better be deleted yellowjuice: tijopi11: Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever but the article wasn’t encouraging cheating, where you go behind your partners back, but instead looking at the issue of cheating as a not black-and-white thing where there’s one horribly evil person who just wanted to have fun/get laid with one traumatized-for-life victim. Instead, like most- nah, let me say with ANYTHING in real life beyond fiction, the article sees the grays in cheating and why the person cheated in the first place. Not to say that cheating isn’t a horrible thing to do, but I feel like people need to understand that there are reasons people do the things they do. People who cheat are human beings. They could feel horrible about it, they could be trapped in a marriage or relationship that they don’t feel they can escape, they can feel insecure and unloved. Again, not to say it’s something you should ever do, but dehumanizing someone over a mistake is just as bad in my opinion. There’s nowhere where they can talk about their experiences, and it’s likely we know a lot of people who have cheated in our lives even if they haven’t (or were too scared) to tell us about it.  “dehumanizing someone over a mistake”
Bad, Cheating, and Life: Why Cheating Isn't Actually That Bad

 Ima count to 3
 and that shit better
 be deleted
yellowjuice:

tijopi11:
Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever but the article wasn’t encouraging cheating, where you go behind your partners back, but instead looking at the issue of cheating as a not black-and-white thing where there’s one horribly evil person who just wanted to have fun/get laid with one traumatized-for-life victim. Instead, like most- nah, let me say with ANYTHING in real life beyond fiction, the article sees the grays in cheating and why the person cheated in the first place. Not to say that cheating isn’t a horrible thing to do, but I feel like people need to understand that there are reasons people do the things they do. People who cheat are human beings. They could feel horrible about it, they could be trapped in a marriage or relationship that they don’t feel they can escape, they can feel insecure and unloved. Again, not to say it’s something you should ever do, but dehumanizing someone over a mistake is just as bad in my opinion. There’s nowhere where they can talk about their experiences, and it’s likely we know a lot of people who have cheated in our lives even if they haven’t (or were too scared) to tell us about it. 
“dehumanizing someone over a mistake”

yellowjuice: tijopi11: Why are people having so much issue with the article, I agreed with it? The title isn’t the most eloquent thing ever...

Bae, Beijing, and Doug: Stavanger Eldar Setre (Equinor) Grethe Moen (Petoro) THE DECOLONIAL ATLAS Copenhagen Søren Skou (Maersk) Calgary Doug Suttles (Encana) Rob Peabody (Husky Energy) Steve Williams (Suncor) Donald Lindsay (Teck) Tim Mckay (Canadian Natural) Moscow Alexey Miler (Gazprom Igor Sechin (Rosneft) Vagit Alekperov (Lukoil) Vadimir Bogdanov (Surgutneftegas) Viadimir Rashevsky (SUEK) Almetyevsk Tarko-Sale Surgut Leonid Mikhelson (Novatek) Vancouver Den Haag Ben van Beurden (Royal Dutch Shell) Nail Maganov (Tatneft) Ekibastuz Nikolay Korsakov (Bogatyr Komir) Katowice Krzysztof Sedakowski (Polska Grupa G Findlay Colin Marshall (Cloud Peak Energy) Gary Heminger (Marathon) Cleveland Gillette Pyongyang London Bob Dudey (BPy Jean-Sábastien Jacques (Rio Tinto) bae(KazMunayGas) Beijing Mun Myong-hak (Ministry of Coal) Dai Houliang (Sinopec) Li Fanrong (CNOOC) Ling Wen (China Energy) Zhang Jianhua (CNPC) Sauat Mynbayev (KazMunayGas) New York Alfred Rankin (NACCOohn Hess (Hess) Karviná Boleslav Kowalczyk (OKD) K TEK) Ashgabat Omaha Denver Michael Hutchinson (Westmoreland Coal) St LouRobert Murray (Mumray Energy) Glenn Kellow (Peabody) Essen Rolf Martin Schmitz (RWE) Pittsburgh John Eaves (Arch Coa Nicholas Delulis (Consol Energy) Kingsport David Stetson (Alpha Natural Resources) Ashirguli Begliyev (TurkmenGaz) Dovletdurdy Hadzhyev (Turkmennebit) Tehran Masoud Karbasian (National Iranian Oil) Baghdad Tokyo Shunichi Nakaigawa (Inpex) Bay Area Mike Wirth (Chevron) Paris Tulsa Patrick Pouyanné (Total) Joseph Craft (Alliance Resource Partners) Oklahoma City David Hager (Devon Energy) Doug Lawler (Chesapeake Energy) El Dorado Vienna Zürich Rainer Seele (OMV) Ivan Glasenberg (Glencore) Jabbar Al-luiebi (Iraq National Oil) Dallas Roger Jenkins (Murphy O) Curtis Morgan (Vistra Energy) Darren Woods (ExonMobil) Delhi Kuwait City Shashi Shankar (ONGC) Birmingham Michael Tracy (Drummond) Damascus Hashem Hashem (KPC) Kolkata Roma Wase Al-Himed (SPC) Abu Dhabi Madrid Josu lmaz (Repsol) Claudio Descalzi (Enl Anil Kumar Jha (Coal India) Houston ) Dammam Ahmed Al Jaber (ADNOC) Amin Nasser (Saudi Aramco) Kothagudem Corbin Robertson (Natural Resource Partners) David Stover (Noble Energy) John Christmann (Apache) Muscat Algiers Rachid Hachichi (Sonatrach) Bangkok Somruedee Chaimongkol (Banpu) Bahrain Raoul Restucci (PDO) Sni Sridhar (SCCL) México Octavio Romero (Pemex) AWalker (Anadarko Petroleum) Cairo Pete Bartiett (BAPCO) Tripoli Tarek El Molla (EGPC) Doha Ryan Lance (ConocoPhilips) Wiliam Way (Southwestern Energy) William Thomas (EOG Resources) Mustafa Sanalla (Libya NOC) Saad Sherida A-Kaabi (QP) Kuala Lumpur Wan Zulkiflee (Pefronas) Abuja Maikanti Baru (Nigerian National Petroleum) Caracas Bogotá Manuel Quevedo (Petróleos de Venezuela) Felipe Bayon (Ecopetrol) Quito Marcelo Proano (Petroecuador) Balikpapan Garibaldi Thohir (Adaro Energy) Palembang Luanda Carlos Saturnino (Sonangol) Arviyan Arifin (Bukit Asam) Jakarta Bob Kamandanu (Berau Coal Energy) Arsjad Rasjid (Indika Energy) Kurnia Ariawan (Kideco) Nicke Widyawati (Pertamina Saptari Hoedaja (Bumi Resources) Johannesburg-Pretoria Mark Cutifani (Anglo American) Mxolisi Mgojo (Exxaro) Stephen Comell (Sasol) Rio de Janeiro Roberto Castello Branco (Petrobras) Buenos Aires Daniel González (YPF) Melbourne Andrew Mackenzie (BHP) 100 companies are responsible for most of the world's greenhouse gas emissions These are the NAMES AND LOCATIONS of their executives Country sizes depict cumulative CO2 emissions from 1850-2011
Bae, Beijing, and Doug: Stavanger
 Eldar Setre (Equinor)
 Grethe Moen (Petoro)
 THE
 DECOLONIAL
 ATLAS
 Copenhagen
 Søren Skou (Maersk)
 Calgary
 Doug Suttles (Encana)
 Rob Peabody (Husky Energy)
 Steve Williams (Suncor)
 Donald Lindsay (Teck) Tim Mckay (Canadian Natural)
 Moscow
 Alexey Miler (Gazprom
 Igor Sechin (Rosneft)
 Vagit Alekperov (Lukoil) Vadimir Bogdanov (Surgutneftegas)
 Viadimir Rashevsky (SUEK) Almetyevsk
 Tarko-Sale
 Surgut Leonid Mikhelson (Novatek)
 Vancouver
 Den Haag
 Ben van Beurden (Royal Dutch Shell)
 Nail Maganov (Tatneft)
 Ekibastuz
 Nikolay Korsakov (Bogatyr Komir)
 Katowice
 Krzysztof Sedakowski (Polska Grupa G
 Findlay
 Colin Marshall (Cloud Peak Energy) Gary Heminger (Marathon)
 Cleveland
 Gillette
 Pyongyang
 London
 Bob Dudey (BPy
 Jean-Sábastien Jacques (Rio Tinto)
 bae(KazMunayGas)
 Beijing Mun Myong-hak (Ministry of Coal)
 Dai Houliang (Sinopec)
 Li Fanrong (CNOOC)
 Ling Wen (China Energy)
 Zhang Jianhua (CNPC)
 Sauat Mynbayev (KazMunayGas)
 New York
 Alfred Rankin (NACCOohn Hess (Hess)
 Karviná
 Boleslav Kowalczyk (OKD) K TEK) Ashgabat
 Omaha
 Denver
 Michael Hutchinson (Westmoreland Coal) St LouRobert Murray (Mumray Energy)
 Glenn Kellow (Peabody)
 Essen
 Rolf Martin Schmitz (RWE)
 Pittsburgh
 John Eaves (Arch Coa Nicholas Delulis (Consol Energy)
 Kingsport
 David Stetson (Alpha Natural Resources)
 Ashirguli Begliyev (TurkmenGaz)
 Dovletdurdy Hadzhyev (Turkmennebit)
 Tehran
 Masoud Karbasian (National Iranian Oil)
 Baghdad
 Tokyo
 Shunichi Nakaigawa (Inpex)
 Bay Area
 Mike Wirth (Chevron)
 Paris
 Tulsa
 Patrick Pouyanné (Total)
 Joseph Craft (Alliance Resource Partners)
 Oklahoma City
 David Hager (Devon Energy)
 Doug Lawler (Chesapeake Energy) El Dorado
 Vienna
 Zürich Rainer Seele (OMV)
 Ivan Glasenberg (Glencore) Jabbar Al-luiebi (Iraq National Oil)
 Dallas Roger Jenkins (Murphy O)
 Curtis Morgan (Vistra Energy)
 Darren Woods (ExonMobil)
 Delhi
 Kuwait City Shashi Shankar (ONGC)
 Birmingham
 Michael Tracy (Drummond)
 Damascus Hashem Hashem (KPC)
 Kolkata
 Roma Wase Al-Himed (SPC)
 Abu Dhabi
 Madrid
 Josu lmaz (Repsol) Claudio Descalzi (Enl
 Anil Kumar Jha (Coal India)
 Houston
 )
 Dammam Ahmed Al Jaber (ADNOC)
 Amin Nasser (Saudi Aramco)
 Kothagudem
 Corbin Robertson (Natural Resource Partners)
 David Stover (Noble Energy)
 John Christmann (Apache)
 Muscat
 Algiers
 Rachid Hachichi (Sonatrach)
 Bangkok
 Somruedee Chaimongkol (Banpu)
 Bahrain Raoul Restucci (PDO) Sni Sridhar (SCCL)
 México
 Octavio Romero (Pemex) AWalker (Anadarko Petroleum)
 Cairo Pete Bartiett (BAPCO)
 Tripoli Tarek El Molla (EGPC) Doha
 Ryan Lance (ConocoPhilips)
 Wiliam Way (Southwestern Energy)
 William Thomas (EOG Resources)
 Mustafa Sanalla (Libya NOC)
 Saad Sherida A-Kaabi (QP)
 Kuala Lumpur
 Wan Zulkiflee (Pefronas)
 Abuja
 Maikanti Baru (Nigerian National Petroleum)
 Caracas
 Bogotá Manuel Quevedo (Petróleos de Venezuela)
 Felipe Bayon (Ecopetrol)
 Quito
 Marcelo Proano (Petroecuador)
 Balikpapan
 Garibaldi Thohir (Adaro Energy)
 Palembang
 Luanda
 Carlos Saturnino (Sonangol)
 Arviyan Arifin (Bukit Asam)
 Jakarta
 Bob Kamandanu (Berau Coal Energy)
 Arsjad Rasjid (Indika Energy)
 Kurnia Ariawan (Kideco)
 Nicke Widyawati (Pertamina
 Saptari Hoedaja (Bumi Resources)
 Johannesburg-Pretoria
 Mark Cutifani (Anglo American)
 Mxolisi Mgojo (Exxaro)
 Stephen Comell (Sasol)
 Rio de Janeiro
 Roberto Castello Branco (Petrobras)
 Buenos Aires
 Daniel González (YPF)
 Melbourne
 Andrew Mackenzie (BHP)
 100 companies are responsible for most of the world's greenhouse gas emissions
 These are the NAMES AND LOCATIONS of their executives
 Country sizes depict cumulative CO2 emissions from 1850-2011