Equalism
Equalism

Equalism

Its Not Fair
Its Not Fair

Its Not Fair

Trump Words
Trump Words

Trump Words

Jasmin
Jasmin

Jasmin

Revenge Is Best
Revenge Is Best

Revenge Is Best

invitations
 invitations

invitations

neighbor
 neighbor

neighbor

july 4th
 july 4th

july 4th

there
there

there

lok
lok

lok

🔥 | Latest

Music, Tumblr, and Work: darktripz: The Epic Of Gilgamesh In Sumerian The EPIC OF GILGAMESH is the earliest great work of literature that we know of, and was first written down by the Sumerians around 2100 B.C. Ancient Sumer was the land that lay between the two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, in Mesopotamia. The language that the Sumerians spoke was unrelated to the Semitic languages of their neighbors the Akkadians and Babylonians, and it was written in a syllabary (a kind of alphabet) called “cuneiform”. By 2000 B.C., the language of Sumer had almost completely died out and was used only by scholars (like Latin is today). No one knows how it was pronounced because it has not been heard in 4000 years. What you hear in this video are a few of the opening lines of part of the epic poem, accompanied only by a long-neck, three-string, Sumerian lute known as a “ngish-gu-di”. The instrument is tuned to G - G - D, and although it is similar to other long neck lutes still in use today (the tar, the setar, the saz, etc.) the modern instruments are low tension and strung with fine steel wire. The ancient long neck lutes (such as the Egyptian “nefer”) were strung with gut and behaved slightly differently. The short-neck lute known as the “oud” is strung with gut/nylon, and its sound has much in common with the ancient long-neck lute although the oud is not a fretted instrument and its strings are much shorter (about 25 inches or 63 cm) as compared to 32 inches (82 cm) on a long-neck instrument. For anyone interested in these lutes, I highly recommend THE ARCHAEOMUSICOLOGY OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST by Professor Richard Dumbrill. The location for this performance is the courtyard of Nebuchadnezzar’s palace in Babylon. The piece is four minutes long and is intended only as a taste of what the music of ancient Sumer might have sounded like. “The Sumerians” by Grendel Dark
Music, Tumblr, and Work: darktripz:

The Epic Of Gilgamesh In Sumerian

The EPIC OF GILGAMESH is the earliest great work of literature that we know of, and was first written down by the Sumerians around 2100 B.C. 

Ancient Sumer was the land that lay between the two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, in Mesopotamia. The language that the Sumerians spoke was unrelated to the Semitic languages of their neighbors the Akkadians and Babylonians, and it was written in a syllabary (a kind of alphabet) called “cuneiform”. By 2000 B.C., the language of Sumer had almost completely died out and was used only by scholars (like Latin is today). No one knows how it was pronounced because it has not been heard in 4000 years.

What you hear in this video are a few of the opening lines of part of the epic poem, accompanied only by a long-neck, three-string, Sumerian lute known as a “ngish-gu-di”. The instrument is tuned to G - G - D, and although it is similar to other long neck lutes still in use today (the tar, the setar, the saz, etc.) the modern instruments are low tension and strung with fine steel wire. The ancient long neck lutes (such as the Egyptian “nefer”) were strung with gut and behaved slightly differently. The short-neck lute known as the “oud” is strung with gut/nylon, and its sound has much in common with the ancient long-neck lute although the oud is not a fretted instrument and its strings are much shorter (about 25 inches or 63 cm) as compared to 32 inches (82 cm) on a long-neck instrument. 

For anyone interested in these lutes, I highly recommend THE ARCHAEOMUSICOLOGY OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST by Professor Richard Dumbrill. 

The location for this performance is the courtyard of Nebuchadnezzar’s palace in Babylon. The piece is four minutes long and is intended only as a taste of what the music of ancient Sumer might have sounded like.

“The Sumerians” by Grendel Dark

darktripz: The Epic Of Gilgamesh In Sumerian The EPIC OF GILGAMESH is the earliest great work of literature that we know of, and was first...

Apparently, Dude, and Fucking: wha!? Sl BAPU BAPTIST CHUR(H SUS DISGUST MyCHILD Dortyouatti? SaSin!God condemns W all! BRIAN heed to have a talk 0 CHRISTIANS CELEBRATE TH ISLAMIC TEMPUE I didnt die ona Cross for this BS RADICAL righte homoSexvality ar the last 2.000 yearsold. prismatic-bell: the-spoopy-ghost-of-raejin99: prismatic-bell: broken-bits-of-dreams: prismatic-bell: aiko-mori-hates-pedos: artbymoga: Throwback to all these Jesus comics I drew in 2012… Good post OP Good post, OP, and if you ever decide to do another may I please suggest “NOT IN HEBREW IT DOESN’T” as a punchline? So much of the Old Testament is HORRIFICALLY translated from the Tanakh, it drives me batty. WAIT WAIT WHAT DOES IT SAY?????? I NEED TO LIKE,, DESTROY MI MUM FOR BEING REALLY HOMOPHOBIC Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say “forbidden.” Here’s the thing: 1) The word translated as “forbidden” is “toevah.” While that translation isn’t … wrong, it’s sort of like saying “McMansion” means “really big house.” There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we … sort of … don’t know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say “so, look around, see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT.“ Thus, if we interpret “toevah” to mean something that’s forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dog–it’s saying you shouldn’t have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice. 2) Following the same “this is ritually forbidden” logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as “don’t do sex magic,” which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time. 3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the “men” in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isn’t the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutive–that is, that the verse should be read as “a man should not lie with a boy.” Now, it’s worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like “yeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.” Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say “ancient Greece” was happening. Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we don’t know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first point–”see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT,” if this verse is interpreted to say “a man should not lie with a boy,” then it’s pretty clearly “my dudes, my fellows, my lads, don’t be fucking pedophiles.” 4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, it’s also possible that “should not lie with a man as with a woman” is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldn’t have sex with another man in a woman’s bed. In the time period, a woman’s bed was sort of like–that was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, you’re violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean “don’t sexually violate a woman’s safety and modesty.”5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which woman’s bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wife’s. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so on–thus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy). So you’ll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces “being gay is wrong, all of the time”.(You’ll also notice the word “abomination” is nowhere to be found. That’s like … a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.) Apparently tumblr mobile doesn’t want to show @prismatic-bell ’s long and in-depth essay, so here’s the screenshots, because it still shows up on mobile browsers: Much appreciated.
Apparently, Dude, and Fucking: wha!?
 Sl
 BAPU
 BAPTIST
 CHUR(H
 SUS
 DISGUST
 MyCHILD

 Dortyouatti?
 SaSin!God
 condemns W
 all!
 BRIAN
 heed to
 have a
 talk
 0

 CHRISTIANS
 CELEBRATE TH
 ISLAMIC TEMPUE
 I didnt
 die ona
 Cross for
 this BS
 RADICAL

 righte
 homoSexvality
 ar the last
 2.000 yearsold.
prismatic-bell:
the-spoopy-ghost-of-raejin99:


prismatic-bell:


broken-bits-of-dreams:

prismatic-bell:


aiko-mori-hates-pedos:

artbymoga:
Throwback to all these Jesus comics I drew in 2012…

Good post OP


Good post, OP, and if you ever decide to do another may I please suggest “NOT IN HEBREW IT DOESN’T” as a punchline? So much of the Old Testament is HORRIFICALLY translated from the Tanakh, it drives me batty.


WAIT WAIT WHAT DOES IT SAY?????? I NEED TO LIKE,, DESTROY MI MUM FOR BEING REALLY HOMOPHOBIC

Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say “forbidden.” Here’s the thing: 

1) The word translated as “forbidden” is “toevah.” While that translation isn’t … wrong, it’s sort of like saying “McMansion” means “really big house.” There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we … sort of … don’t know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say “so, look around, see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT.“ Thus, if we interpret “toevah” to mean something that’s forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dog–it’s saying you shouldn’t have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice.

2) Following the same “this is ritually forbidden” logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as “don’t do sex magic,” which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time.

3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the “men” in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isn’t the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutive–that is, that the verse should be read as “a man should not lie with a boy.” Now, it’s worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like “yeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.” 

Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say “ancient Greece” was happening. 

Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we don’t know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first point–”see your neighbors? DON’T DO THAT,” if this verse is interpreted to say “a man should not lie with a boy,” then it’s pretty clearly “my dudes, my fellows, my lads, don’t be fucking pedophiles.” 

4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, it’s also possible that “should not lie with a man as with a woman” is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldn’t have sex with another man in a woman’s bed. In the time period, a woman’s bed was sort of like–that was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, you’re violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean “don’t sexually violate a woman’s safety and modesty.”5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which woman’s bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wife’s. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so on–thus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy).


So you’ll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces “being gay is wrong, all of the time”.(You’ll also notice the word “abomination” is nowhere to be found. That’s like … a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.)


Apparently tumblr mobile doesn’t want to show @prismatic-bell ’s long and in-depth essay, so here’s the screenshots, because it still shows up on mobile browsers:








Much appreciated.

prismatic-bell: the-spoopy-ghost-of-raejin99: prismatic-bell: broken-bits-of-dreams: prismatic-bell: aiko-mori-hates-pedos: artbymog...

Bad, Fucking, and Funny: There's a thing called "Rubber duck debugging" in which a programmer explains the code to a rubber duck in hopes of finding the bug Ultrafacts.tumblr.com ultrafacts tmblr.com ATultrafacts Source absorr Some of you are reblogging because you think its funny that programmers would talk to ducks. I'm reblogging because I think its funny picturing a programmer explaining their code, realizing what they did when they explain the bad code, then grabbing the strangling the duck while yelling "WHY WAS THE FIX THAT SIMPLE!? AM I GOING BLIND!" monobeartheater AS A PROGRAMMER I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU FUCKING DO WE HAD TO BAN THE DUCKS FROM MY CLASSES BECAUSE EVERYONE WOULD FLIP THE DUCK OR THROW IT AT A WALL OR SOMETHING WHEN THEY FIGURED OUT THE PROBLEM IN THEIR CODE kierenwalkerpds so that's the function of a rubber duck lifeofdavo ΑΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΑ cosrnos work at a startup and part of the onboarding package you get when you first start working here now includes a rubber duck. We also have a bigger version of the duck for the extra hard problems. Sometimes one duck doesn't cut it and you need to borrow your neighbors to get more ducks on the problem. One time we couldn't figure out why something wasn't working right so we assembled the counsel of ducks and by the grace of the Duck Gods were we able to finally come to a solution. These ducks have saved many lives and should be respected for the heroes they are. May the Duck Gods watch over you.
Bad, Fucking, and Funny: There's a thing called "Rubber duck
 debugging" in which a programmer
 explains the code to a rubber duck in
 hopes of finding the bug
 Ultrafacts.tumblr.com
 ultrafacts tmblr.com
 ATultrafacts
 Source
 absorr
 Some of you are reblogging because you
 think its funny that programmers would talk
 to ducks. I'm reblogging because I think its
 funny picturing a programmer explaining
 their code, realizing what they did when
 they explain the bad code, then grabbing
 the strangling the duck while yelling "WHY
 WAS THE FIX THAT SIMPLE!? AM I GOING
 BLIND!"
 monobeartheater
 AS A PROGRAMMER I CAN TELL YOU
 THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU
 FUCKING DO WE HAD TO BAN THE DUCKS
 FROM MY CLASSES BECAUSE EVERYONE
 WOULD FLIP THE DUCK OR THROW IT AT
 A WALL OR SOMETHING WHEN THEY
 FIGURED OUT THE PROBLEM IN THEIR
 CODE
 kierenwalkerpds
 so that's the function of a rubber duck
 lifeofdavo
 ΑΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΛΑ
 cosrnos
 work at a startup and part of the
 onboarding package you get when you first
 start working here now includes a rubber
 duck. We also have a bigger version of the
 duck for the extra hard problems.
 Sometimes one duck doesn't cut it and you
 need to borrow your neighbors to get more
 ducks on the problem. One time we
 couldn't figure out why something wasn't
 working right so we assembled the counsel
 of ducks and by the grace of the Duck Gods
 were we able to finally come to a solution.
 These ducks have saved many lives and
 should be respected for the heroes they
 are.
May the Duck Gods watch over you.

May the Duck Gods watch over you.

Target, Tumblr, and Blog: O P R anotherplural1: It’s 5:42, the neighbors’ll kill me
Target, Tumblr, and Blog: O P R
anotherplural1:

It’s 5:42, the neighbors’ll kill me

anotherplural1: It’s 5:42, the neighbors’ll kill me

Charlie, Petty, and Saw: HERE YOu GO,KID. .ALL CASH, AS PROMISED eleva GOOD. TRY SOㅆ OTHER SHOWS AN, 'LL CONTACT you DuURING THE WEEK. STOP THAT Guy! 囧 KREECH STOP HIM! DON'T LET HIM GET TO THE ELEVATOR! WHATEVER THANKS YOu ONE! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG AND YET 工DİDN'T MAGINE THAT 工NEVER SAW YOu OR ANYONE HAVE STOPPED HIM AT LEAST, SLOWED HIM DOWN NEEDED YOu THESE LAST FEW YEARS SO DON'T BLAME ㅆE FOR RETURNING THE FAVOR 5 6622 嶝 レISTEN, SON YOU'RE GOING TO NEED TO SIT DOWN FOR A ㅆㅇㅆENT. THIS IS GOING TO BE A SHOCK TO YOU YOUR AUNT'S OKAY SHE'S WITH THE NEIGHBORS RIGHT NOW WHAT'S GOING ON引 MAY? WHAT'S HAPPENING2 TELL ㅆ티 IT'S YOUR 凵NCLE BEN, THERE'S BEEN AN INCIDENT THERE'S NO EASY WAY TO SAY THIS SON YOUR UNCLE TRIED THERE WAS A LOT OF TO STOP THE CASH LYING AROUNDGuY AND HE AFRAID YOUR UNCLE DIDN'T MAKE IT GOT SHOT BROKE IN. IS HE IS HE OKAY TEN CHARLIE-SEVEN... OVER THIS IS TEN-CHARLIE SEVEN. OVER WE HAVE A POSSIBLE SIGHTING ON YOUR SUSPECT: WHITE ㅆALE, LATE THIRTIES BLOND HAIR AND RED JACKET. SUSPICIOUS ㅆALE SEEN ENTERING ACㅆ WAREHOUSE ON PARLOR STREET, OVER. traincat: “What the hell is wrong with you? You could have stopped him… at least, slowed him down.”“And yet I didn’t. Imagine that.” Mythos: Spider-Man I know everyone is tired of seeing the origin on film in reboots, but the origin is important. One moment of I honestly don’t even think you can call it selfishness! One moment of apathy! One moment of not doing good because if you have the power to do good it is your responsibility to do it! And this is what happens! One moment! No high tech suits, no craving approval from authority figures. One moment in a back hall or a parking garage or a convenience store. One stupid petty vindictive moment that felt GOOD. That felt BETTER than helping. That’s what it boils down to. Spider-Man is about the opposite of rewards.
nsfw
Charlie, Petty, and Saw: HERE YOu
 GO,KID. .ALL
 CASH, AS
 PROMISED
 eleva
 GOOD. TRY
 SOㅆ OTHER SHOWS
 AN, 'LL CONTACT
 you DuURING
 THE WEEK.

 STOP
 THAT
 Guy!
 囧
 KREECH
 STOP HIM!
 DON'T LET HIM
 GET TO THE
 ELEVATOR!
 WHATEVER
 THANKS
 YOu ONE!
 WHAT THE
 HELL IS WRONG
 AND YET
 工DİDN'T
 MAGINE
 THAT
 工NEVER SAW YOu OR ANYONE
 HAVE STOPPED HIM
 AT LEAST, SLOWED
 HIM DOWN
 NEEDED YOu THESE LAST
 FEW YEARS
 SO DON'T
 BLAME ㅆE FOR
 RETURNING THE
 FAVOR
 5
 6622
 嶝

 レISTEN, SON
 YOU'RE GOING TO
 NEED TO SIT DOWN
 FOR A ㅆㅇㅆENT.
 THIS IS GOING
 TO BE A SHOCK
 TO YOU
 YOUR
 AUNT'S OKAY
 SHE'S WITH
 THE NEIGHBORS
 RIGHT NOW
 WHAT'S
 GOING ON引
 MAY?
 WHAT'S
 HAPPENING2
 TELL ㅆ티
 IT'S YOUR
 凵NCLE BEN, THERE'S
 BEEN AN INCIDENT
 THERE'S
 NO EASY WAY
 TO SAY THIS
 SON
 YOUR
 UNCLE TRIED
 THERE WAS A LOT OF TO STOP THE
 CASH LYING AROUNDGuY AND HE
 AFRAID YOUR
 UNCLE DIDN'T
 MAKE IT
 GOT SHOT
 BROKE IN.
 IS HE
 IS HE
 OKAY
 TEN
 CHARLIE-SEVEN...
 OVER
 THIS IS
 TEN-CHARLIE
 SEVEN. OVER
 WE HAVE
 A POSSIBLE SIGHTING
 ON YOUR SUSPECT: WHITE
 ㅆALE, LATE THIRTIES
 BLOND HAIR AND RED
 JACKET. SUSPICIOUS ㅆALE
 SEEN ENTERING ACㅆ
 WAREHOUSE ON PARLOR
 STREET, OVER.
traincat:
“What the hell is wrong with you? You could have stopped him… at least, slowed him down.”“And yet I didn’t. Imagine that.”
Mythos: Spider-Man
I know everyone is tired of seeing the origin on film in reboots, but the origin is important. One moment of I honestly don’t even think you can call it selfishness! One moment of apathy! One moment of not doing good because if you have the power to do good it is your responsibility to do it! And this is what happens! One moment! No high tech suits, no craving approval from authority figures. One moment in a back hall or a parking garage or a convenience store. One stupid petty vindictive moment that felt GOOD. That felt BETTER than helping. That’s what it boils down to. Spider-Man is about the opposite of rewards.

traincat: “What the hell is wrong with you? You could have stopped him… at least, slowed him down.”“And yet I didn’t. Imagine that.” Mythos:...