Wallet
Wallet

Wallet

orks
 orks

orks

said
 said

said

wows
wows

wows

ots
ots

ots

actual
actual

actual

yours
yours

yours

ons
ons

ons

courtesy
courtesy

courtesy

existed
existed

existed

🔥 | Latest

Facebook, Friends, and Hello: Practice material by Danica Gondová and Eva Paulerová T Elise@lightspeed.net t is Subject: Hello the Dear Elise, My name is Ronita Dutta. I'm writing to introduce myself as part of our school penfriend project with your school in Rennes. I'm fifteen years old 1 called Dorking. My parents came to Britain from India in the late 1980s. I was born in London 2 I have only ever been to India once, but l'd love to go back some day. -, near a town kou day. I've just started Year 9 here at Laurel Hill School. The school is nice, an old manor house in the countryside, I'm glad to be near Laurel Hill 3 back at school after the holiday because I can see my friends again. Laurel Hill's a boarding school, so I live in the student hall during term time, 4 away from home some of the time. When I stay at school for the weekend, I try to go horse-riding or swimming, 5 -. It's great being Apart from swimming and horses, I like music, like the Scissor Sisters, Kylie, and Lady Gaga. Is Lady Gaga big in France? My favourite subjects are English and history I hate maths and physics -6 sure what I want to do when I leave school, but I don't think 7 an English teacher. What about you, Elise? I'm looking forward to finding out all about you. Send me your Facebook details if you're a member, and a email of course! I'm not really t. I'm thinking of becoming a journalist or Bye for now, Roni WRITING My English student's book. Made by Oxford.
Facebook, Friends, and Hello: Practice material by Danica Gondová and Eva Paulerová
 T Elise@lightspeed.net
 t is
 Subject: Hello
 the
 Dear Elise,
 My name is Ronita Dutta. I'm writing to introduce myself
 as part of our school penfriend project with your school in
 Rennes. I'm fifteen years old 1
 called Dorking. My parents came to Britain from India
 in the late 1980s. I was born in London 2
 I have only ever been to India once, but l'd love to go back
 some day.
 -, near a town
 kou
 day.
 I've just started Year 9 here at Laurel Hill School.
 The school is nice, an old manor house in the countryside,
 I'm glad to be
 near Laurel Hill 3
 back at school after the holiday because I can see my
 friends again.
 Laurel Hill's a boarding school, so I live in the student
 hall during term time, 4
 away from home some of the time. When I stay at school
 for the weekend, I try to go horse-riding or swimming,
 5
 -. It's great being
 Apart from swimming and horses, I like music, like the
 Scissor Sisters, Kylie, and Lady Gaga. Is Lady Gaga big
 in France? My favourite subjects are English and history
 I hate maths and physics -6
 sure what I want to do when I leave school, but I don't think
 7
 an English teacher.
 What about you, Elise? I'm looking forward to finding out
 all about you. Send me your Facebook details if you're a
 member, and a email of course!
 I'm not really
 t.
 I'm thinking of becoming a journalist or
 Bye for now,
 Roni
 WRITING
My English student's book. Made by Oxford.

My English student's book. Made by Oxford.

Run, Help, and How To: CS2308_P5 [CAUsers X Eile Edit View Navigate Code Refactor Build Run Tools VCS WindowHelp ACLionProjects\CS2308_P5] - ...\LondonEye.cpp - CLion CS2308_P5 London Eye.cpp CS2308 P5 | Debug ACMakeLists.txt X a LondonEye.cpp Treservations.txt Project HStack.hX HQueue.h X CS2308_P5 C\Users \CLion Projects\CS 17 Queue group; int current_people = 0, size; // size being from the file, only a temp var. cmake-build-debug 18 CMakeLists.txt std: :string name; // name of group from the file, only a temp var. std: :cout<< "test0" ; do getline & fin , fin >> size; 19 London Eye.cpp 20 C++ HQueue.h 21 reservations. txt &: name); 22 Stackh ill External Libraries 23 current_people += size; std::cout << "help" 24 Scratches and Consoles 25 if(current_people <= MAX_SIZE) { 26 27 group.enqueue(name , size) ; } 28 else{ 29 std::cout<< "Last allowed : " << name; 30 31 }while(!fin.eof() && current_people <= MAX_SIZE); 32 std::cout << "test1"; 33 fin.close(); 34 35 return 0; 36 37 f main CS2308_P5 X Run: phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelph Process finished with exit code -1073741510 (OXCO000 13A interrupted by Ctrl+C) 4: Run E 6: TODO 1 Event Log Terminal Messages CMake 25:29 LF UTF-8 4 spaces C++: CS2308_P5 | Debug Build finished in 997 ms (8 minutes ago) 10:19 PM CL Type here to search 4 11/18/2019 2: Favorites Z: Structure Database Literally no one: ... Programmers: "HoW To DeBUg StEP 1"
Run, Help, and How To: CS2308_P5 [CAUsers
 X
 Eile Edit View Navigate Code Refactor Build Run Tools VCS WindowHelp
 ACLionProjects\CS2308_P5] - ...\LondonEye.cpp - CLion
 CS2308_P5 London Eye.cpp
 CS2308 P5 | Debug
 ACMakeLists.txt X
 a LondonEye.cpp
 Treservations.txt
 Project
 HStack.hX
 HQueue.h X
 CS2308_P5 C\Users
 \CLion Projects\CS 17
 Queue group;
 int current_people = 0, size; // size being from the file, only a temp var.
 cmake-build-debug
 18
 CMakeLists.txt
 std: :string name; // name of group from the file, only a temp var.
 std: :cout<< "test0" ;
 do
 getline & fin ,
 fin >> size;
 19
 London Eye.cpp
 20
 C++
 HQueue.h
 21
 reservations. txt
 &: name);
 22
 Stackh
 ill External Libraries
 23
 current_people += size;
 std::cout << "help"
 24
 Scratches and Consoles
 25
 if(current_people <= MAX_SIZE) {
 26
 27
 group.enqueue(name , size) ;
 }
 28
 else{
 29
 std::cout<< "Last allowed : "
 << name;
 30
 31
 }while(!fin.eof() && current_people <= MAX_SIZE);
 32
 std::cout << "test1";
 33
 fin.close();
 34
 35
 return 0;
 36
 37
 f main
 CS2308_P5 X
 Run:
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphel
 phelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelph
 Process finished with exit code -1073741510 (OXCO000 13A interrupted by Ctrl+C)
 4: Run
 E 6: TODO
 1 Event Log
 Terminal
 Messages
 CMake
 25:29 LF UTF-8 4 spaces C++: CS2308_P5 | Debug
 Build finished in 997 ms (8 minutes ago)
 10:19 PM
 CL
 Type here to search
 4
 11/18/2019
 2: Favorites
 Z: Structure
 Database
Literally no one: ... Programmers: "HoW To DeBUg StEP 1"

Literally no one: ... Programmers: "HoW To DeBUg StEP 1"

Clothes, Funny, and Soon...: The Chad British Fascist The Virgin UKIPer Well-groomed: has a finely cut moustache and slicked back, neat Has a massive following: holds the biggest in-door rally in human history Has a tiny following in comparison, consisting mainly of pensioners Poorly groomed; can't even grow a moustache without looking like a paedophile; shaves it off as soon as the public ridicules him hair Chooses very aesthetic and imposing symbol for his Chooses worst possible colour scheme for his symbol movement Does not fear opposition: gets into street fights with brass knuckles and knives (only when provoked, of course) Runs away from adversity; always stays in his vehicle when crowds gather against him Spent his early years sitting at a desk like a slob Spent his early years fighting bravely in the trenches and in the air in the Constantly calls out the Jew and frequently marches in the Jewish part of London for the laughs Is funded by Jews Great War Shows off fine physique in skin-tight yet stylish clothing Constantly tries to prove he isn't a Nazi by expelling BNP members and parading non-white members in front of the cameras Isn't afraid of being called a "Nazi"; names organisation "British Union of Fascists and National Socialists" to prove it Dresses like a slimy businessman to hide his chubby physique Is a LITERAL knight Is a LITERAL FROG Is deemed so dangerous by the government he is arrested Inspires great loyalty: his followers get executed for their loyalty No fucks given: continues campaigning after the war regardless His followers have no loyalty; flock to the Conservatives and Colour co-ordinates all of his clothes to reflect Labour after his failed election his political ideology Has fantastic oratory skills; his hypnotising speeches are still revered today Gives speeches poorly, as though he was a best man at a wedding A bit political but still funny
Clothes, Funny, and Soon...: The Chad British Fascist
 The Virgin UKIPer
 Well-groomed: has a finely cut
 moustache and slicked back, neat
 Has a massive following: holds the biggest in-door
 rally in human history
 Has a tiny following in comparison,
 consisting mainly of pensioners
 Poorly groomed; can't even
 grow a moustache
 without looking like a
 paedophile; shaves it off as
 soon as the public ridicules him
 hair
 Chooses very aesthetic and imposing symbol for his
 Chooses worst possible colour scheme
 for his symbol
 movement
 Does not fear opposition: gets into street fights with
 brass knuckles and knives (only when provoked, of
 course)
 Runs away from adversity;
 always stays in his vehicle
 when crowds gather against him
 Spent his early years sitting at a desk
 like a slob
 Spent his early years
 fighting bravely in the
 trenches and in the air in the
 Constantly calls out the Jew and frequently
 marches in the Jewish part of London for the
 laughs
 Is funded by Jews
 Great War
 Shows off fine physique in
 skin-tight yet stylish
 clothing
 Constantly tries to prove he isn't a
 Nazi by expelling BNP members and
 parading non-white members in
 front of the cameras
 Isn't afraid of being called a "Nazi"; names
 organisation "British Union of Fascists and
 National Socialists" to prove it
 Dresses like a slimy businessman to
 hide his chubby physique
 Is a LITERAL knight
 Is a LITERAL FROG
 Is deemed so dangerous by the government he is arrested
 Inspires great loyalty: his followers
 get executed for their loyalty
 No fucks given: continues campaigning after the war regardless
 His followers have no loyalty;
 flock to the Conservatives and
 Colour co-ordinates all of his clothes to reflect
 Labour after his failed election
 his political ideology
 Has fantastic oratory skills; his hypnotising speeches are still
 revered today
 Gives speeches poorly, as though he was a best man at a wedding
A bit political but still funny

A bit political but still funny

Children, Coca-Cola, and College: BECOMES HAD A GREAT Will socialists take my Productivity has almost doubled while working class wages have stagnated 238.7% HOMEOWNER AT 22 CEO pay is up 997% since 1978 UNION JOB 250% 1948-1973: 1973-2014: Kenny Loggins records? Percent change in CEO compensation, stock prices, and typical worker compensation, 1978-2014 Productivity: 96.7% Hourly compensation: Productivity: 72.2% Hourly compensation: 9.2% Socialists are not interested in collectivizing because we don't love your music. It's not СЕО раy 91.3% 200 Loggins. We simply don't want a world without personal property the things meant for individual consumption. Instead, socialists strive for a society without private property the things that give the people who own them Productivity 1,250% 997.2% 1,000 150 power over those who don't. The power created by private property is expressed most clearly in the labor market, where business owners get 750 109.0% TELLS SON'S GENERATION ITS LUCKY BECAUSE IT CAN AFFORD $200 SMARTPHONES 100 "UNIONS ARE RUINING THE COUNTRY. 503.4% to decide who deserves a job and who doesn't, and are able to impose working conditions that, 500 S&P 500 Hourly compensation if given a fair alternative, ordinary people would otherwise reject. And even though workers do most of the actual work at a job, owners have unilateral say over how profits are divided up and don't compensate employees for all the value they produce. "In 1978, I made $10 an hour installing air conditioning. I had a brand new truck that cost $6,800. I rented a 2-bedroom house for $300 a month. Gas was $0.60 a gallon. Food and insurance were cheap. Now, the same job pays $17 an hour, that truck is $40,000, the house is $1400 a month, and food costs 7 times more. How can the people of our country advance in life like this?" 250 50 "WHEN I WAS IN COLLEGE HAS IT BETTER Typical worker pay 10.9% MY SUMMER JOB PAID THE TUITION" 0 THAN HIS PARENTS 2000 2010 1980 1990 1980 2000 1960 Chart Data Radically changing things would mean taking away the source of capitalists' power: the private ownership of property. Source: Economic Policy Institute analysis of data from Compustat's ExecuComp database, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Current Employment Statistics program, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis NIPA tables, as seen in Top CEOS Make 300 Note: Data are for average hourly compensation of production/nonsupervisory workers in the private sector and net productivity of the total economy. "Net productivity" is the growth of output of goods and services minus depreciation per hour worked. Times More than Typical Workers. Economic Policy Institute In a socialist society even one in which markets are retained in spheres like consumer goods-you and your fellow workers wouldn't spend your day making others rich. You would keep much more of the value you produced. This could translate into more material comfort or, alternatively, the possibility of deciding to work less with no loss in compensation so you could go to school or take up a hobby... That's the socialist vision: abolishing private ownership of the things we all need and use factories, banks, offices, natural resources, utilities, - Mark Zeitler, Average American TUITION WAS $400 AND HIS KIDS "It is difficult for me to imagine what personal liberty'is enjoyed by an unemployed hungry person. True freedom can only be where there is no exploitation and oppression of one person by another, where there is not unemployment, and where a person is not living in fear of losing his job, his home and his bread. Only in such a society, personal and any other freedom can exist for real and not on paper. BOUGHT A HOUSE IN HIS 20S "WHY DON'T YOU CALL David Yankovich WITH A 9-TO-5 JOB THAT DIDNT REQUIRE A BACHELOR'S DEGREE @DavidYankovich AND ASK IF THEY'RE HIRING?" communication and transportation infrastructure and replacing it with social ownership, thereby undercutting the power of elites to hoard wealth and power When your boss's income has risen 937% since 1978 and yours has increased by only 5.7%, it's time to stop Socialists want a world without private property, not personal property. You can keep pour terrible music. blaming minorities for your woes. From Bhaskar Sunkara in The ABCS of Socialism. Jacabin Magazine (2016) HASN'T BEEN ON AJOBKIDS THESE DAYS HUNT SINCE 1982 -I.V. Dzhugashvili HAVE IT EASY M.Vigor Georgian/Soviet philosopher and political activist MUG ssa 5GUT EXcel e Si asso LNpton Thito bidt ै TOsttas HASNT APPLIED FOR A FINANCES BOAT AMP TIapicana Sa kaus LAEL MAGIM KeM GT Nai Grain Dole Dopsi JOB SINCE JIMMY CARTER Quality of Life Higher in Socialist Nations, Study Says June 07, 1986 MARCIDA DODSON | Times Staff Writer VL NATURE Au @3.9% full DASANI AW witawin Bloomberg @business CORN yook marLa StarbufsT AAKES Thdent Clorets After being razed to the ground by a World War and a foreign-backed Civil War, and under constant economic and diplomatic assault, the Soviet Unio... Bloomberg ALOIDS ఉ CPS YS VECT gtN HEAS Bran frifo Tweet Recommend 4 Share V B G+ Email GLACEAU PLasmSTI ERSMWay N Dove TeaLERONS Cheerios NINE pple Yum oR PEPFER Chex an EAKS People who live in socialist countries enjoy a higher level of health, education and overall physical quality of life than do residents of capitalist countries with similar economic development, according to a study co-authored by UC Irvine and and Cal State Long Beach professors. QuuER Raised life expectancy by 65 %. Increased real income by 370 %. Housing, medicine, transport and insurance accounted for 15% of family income, compared to 50% in US. 2 Eliminated homelessness. Housing was provided based on need and rent averaged 2-3% of family income, compared to 25-30 % in the US. 3 Eliminated unemployment. A job was considered a right, firing was rare and had to be cleared by the employee's union, and employers were required to find redundant workers new employment and pay for retraining and cost of living. 4 Provided healthcare as a right. The USSR had the highest ratio of doctors to population in the world and one of the highest quality healthcare systems, including preventative care and house visits. s Achieved full literacy from a starting point of 38% for men and 12 % for women. Raised school enrollment by 460 %. 7 Catby WRIGLEY BOVH1 Economists are starting to suspect PH:0 a ও Uncle Bens Coca-Cola UR Hellrgg's C Triscul PREMIUM that unions were a better deal than MARS PEPSICO KRAFT NAM Hoc enco ucoss textbooks made them out to be S JELLO rer NESTEA NESCAFE "YOU NEED TO HIT THE BRICKS' TO FIND WORK. THAT'S WHAT IDID" Thsters CHOe P&G :Nestle EPELLECRIN Johmenohmon MAKES YOU BORROW Unilevey Vittel IATSE TUITION MONEY AT 8.9% Rete EECC @IATSE S LOREAL "AT MY FIRST JOBIONLY GROWS UP IN ONE OF THE WORLD'S BEST ECONOMIES Sipleraia IAMS २ Nestl PEpaonFNT GARNGR VICHY Gral Crast Neuragen 10RTS DAWN de MADE $15K A YEAR." MdvENIC Dfabr Lrke Visne vizoral Cascade Douny IVORY JOy Scope Fiodent OMBSEE MMAYCCLLIE Kes GAUL dir ONETOUCH BAND-AID It's almost as if-bear with me for a un Provided secondary education as a right as well as a cost of living stipend to BOUDN Pepte vieks Chetmate TYLEWOL RERE Motri epcid PRINA ஒதல் students maintaining a 'B' average.. 8 Heavily subsidized early childcare. Fees for pre-schools didn't exceed 2-3 % of family income and 50 % of urban and 33% of rural children attended day-care, compared to 10 % in the US overall.9 and Eliminated the gender pay gap. CONTRGR second people with power and SULAFLD Id u Gilete Ce Se TAMPAX abaysPampers Existential Comics @existentialcoms Aug 29 Stockholders have an incentive to drive wages down. Landlords have an incentive to drive rent up. These two groups own basically everything, and control most of our society and politics. cantic NoaDua RunLa a rsum DURACELL PUR BOSS DIESEL PANTENE LACOSTE ALPU 11xe alnd BRAUN money conspired to create an economic situation that enabled them Sources: 1. A. Szymanski, On the Uses of Disinformotion to Legitimize Revival of the Cold War: Health and the USSR Science and Society, Winter, 1981.2. Corrigan, Philip, Ramsay, Harvie and Sayer, Derek, Bolshevism and the USSR, New Left Review, No. 125, January-February, 1981. 3, 8, and 9. George, Vic and Manning, Nick, Socialism, Social Welfare and the Soviet Union, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980. 4. Gregory, Paul R. and Stuart, Robert C., Soviet Economic Structure and Performance, New York: Harper and Row, 1974. 5. Sivard, Rugh Legar, World Mlitary and Social Expenditures, Leeburg, Virginia: WMSE Publications, 1980. 6. Mickiewicz, Ruth, Handbook of Soviet Social Science Dato, New York: Free Press, 1973. 7. Central Statistical Board of the USSR, The USSR in Figures for 1978, Moscow Statisika Publishers, 1978. 10. St. George, George, Our Soviet Sister, New York: Robert B. Luce, 1973 to keep more of their power and CREATES THE WORST But yes, immigrants are to blame. money, at the expense of the workers who made their success possible. IN 1979 THAT WAS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY THE EQUIVALENT OF $47K. WORLD HAS EVER SEEN t 2.1K 5.7K 43 Cumulative percent change since 1948 What was the eureka moment or realization that turned YOU into a socialist?
Children, Coca-Cola, and College: BECOMES
 HAD A GREAT
 Will socialists take my
 Productivity has almost doubled while working class wages have stagnated
 238.7%
 HOMEOWNER AT 22
 CEO pay is up 997% since 1978
 UNION JOB
 250%
 1948-1973:
 1973-2014:
 Kenny Loggins records?
 Percent change in CEO compensation, stock prices, and typical worker
 compensation, 1978-2014
 Productivity: 96.7%
 Hourly compensation:
 Productivity: 72.2%
 Hourly compensation: 9.2%
 Socialists are not interested in collectivizing
 because we don't love
 your music. It's not
 СЕО раy
 91.3%
 200
 Loggins. We simply don't want a world without
 personal property the things meant for
 individual consumption. Instead, socialists strive
 for a society without private property the
 things that give the people who own them
 Productivity
 1,250%
 997.2%
 1,000
 150
 power over those who don't. The power created
 by private property is expressed most clearly
 in the labor market, where business owners get
 750
 109.0%
 TELLS SON'S GENERATION ITS
 LUCKY BECAUSE IT CAN
 AFFORD $200 SMARTPHONES
 100
 "UNIONS ARE RUINING
 THE COUNTRY.
 503.4%
 to decide who deserves a job and who doesn't,
 and are able to impose working conditions that,
 500
 S&P 500
 Hourly compensation
 if given a fair alternative, ordinary people
 would otherwise reject. And even though
 workers do most of the actual work at a job,
 owners have unilateral say over how profits
 are divided up and don't compensate
 employees for all the value they produce.
 "In 1978, I made $10 an hour
 installing air conditioning. I had a
 brand new truck that cost $6,800. I
 rented a 2-bedroom house for $300 a
 month. Gas was $0.60 a gallon. Food
 and insurance were cheap. Now, the
 same job pays $17 an hour, that truck
 is $40,000, the house is $1400 a
 month, and food costs 7 times more.
 How can the people of our
 country advance in life like this?"
 250
 50
 "WHEN I WAS IN COLLEGE
 HAS IT BETTER
 Typical worker pay 10.9%
 MY SUMMER JOB PAID
 THE TUITION"
 0
 THAN HIS PARENTS
 2000
 2010
 1980
 1990
 1980
 2000
 1960
 Chart Data
 Radically changing things would
 mean taking away the source of
 capitalists' power: the private
 ownership of property.
 Source: Economic Policy Institute analysis of data from Compustat's ExecuComp database, Federal
 Reserve Economic Data (FRED) from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Current Employment
 Statistics program, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis NIPA tables, as seen in Top CEOS Make 300
 Note: Data are for average hourly compensation of production/nonsupervisory workers in the private
 sector and net productivity of the total economy. "Net productivity" is the growth of output of goods and
 services minus depreciation per hour worked.
 Times More than Typical Workers.
 Economic Policy Institute
 In a socialist society
 even one in which
 markets are retained in spheres like consumer
 goods-you and your fellow workers wouldn't
 spend your day making others rich. You would
 keep much more of the value you produced.
 This could translate into more material comfort
 or, alternatively, the possibility of deciding to
 work less with no loss in compensation so you
 could go to school or take up a hobby... That's
 the socialist vision: abolishing private ownership
 of the things we all need and use factories,
 banks, offices, natural resources, utilities,
 - Mark Zeitler, Average American
 TUITION WAS
 $400
 AND HIS KIDS
 "It is difficult for me to imagine what
 personal liberty'is enjoyed by an
 unemployed hungry person.
 True freedom can only be where there
 is no exploitation and oppression of
 one person by another, where there
 is not unemployment, and where a
 person is not living in fear of losing
 his job, his home and his bread. Only
 in such a society, personal and any
 other freedom can exist for real
 and not on paper.
 BOUGHT A HOUSE IN HIS 20S
 "WHY DON'T YOU CALL
 David Yankovich
 WITH A 9-TO-5 JOB THAT DIDNT
 REQUIRE A BACHELOR'S DEGREE
 @DavidYankovich
 AND ASK IF THEY'RE
 HIRING?"
 communication and transportation infrastructure
 and replacing it with social ownership,
 thereby undercutting the power of elites to
 hoard wealth and power
 When your boss's income has risen
 937% since 1978 and yours has
 increased by only 5.7%, it's time to stop
 Socialists want a world
 without private property,
 not personal property.
 You can keep pour terrible
 music.
 blaming minorities for your woes.
 From Bhaskar Sunkara in The ABCS of
 Socialism. Jacabin Magazine (2016)
 HASN'T BEEN ON AJOBKIDS THESE DAYS
 HUNT SINCE 1982
 -I.V. Dzhugashvili
 HAVE IT EASY
 M.Vigor
 Georgian/Soviet philosopher
 and political activist
 MUG
 ssa 5GUT
 EXcel
 e Si
 asso
 LNpton
 Thito
 bidt
 ै
 TOsttas
 HASNT APPLIED FOR A
 FINANCES BOAT
 AMP
 TIapicana
 Sa
 kaus
 LAEL
 MAGIM
 KeM GT
 Nai Grain
 Dole
 Dopsi
 JOB SINCE JIMMY CARTER
 Quality of Life Higher in Socialist Nations, Study Says
 June 07, 1986 MARCIDA DODSON | Times Staff Writer
 VL NATURE
 Au
 @3.9%
 full
 DASANI
 AW
 witawin
 Bloomberg
 @business
 CORN
 yook
 marLa
 StarbufsT
 AAKES
 Thdent Clorets
 After being razed to the ground by a World War and a foreign-backed Civil War,
 and under constant economic and diplomatic assault, the Soviet Unio...
 Bloomberg
 ALOIDS
 ఉ
 CPS
 YS VECT
 gtN HEAS
 Bran
 frifo
 Tweet
 Recommend 4
 Share
 V B
 G+
 Email
 GLACEAU
 PLasmSTI
 ERSMWay
 N Dove
 TeaLERONS
 Cheerios
 NINE
 pple
 Yum
 oR PEPFER
 Chex an
 EAKS
 People who live in socialist countries enjoy a higher level of health, education and overall physical quality of life than do
 residents of capitalist countries with similar economic development, according to a study co-authored by UC Irvine and and
 Cal State Long Beach professors.
 QuuER
 Raised life expectancy by 65 %.
 Increased real income by 370 %. Housing, medicine, transport and insurance
 accounted for 15% of family income, compared to 50% in US. 2
 Eliminated homelessness. Housing was provided based on need and rent averaged
 2-3% of family income, compared to 25-30 % in the US. 3
 Eliminated unemployment. A job was considered a right, firing was rare and had to
 be cleared by the employee's union, and employers were required to find
 redundant workers new employment and pay for retraining and cost of living. 4
 Provided healthcare as a right. The USSR had the highest ratio of doctors to
 population in the world and one of the highest quality healthcare systems, including
 preventative care and house visits. s
 Achieved full literacy from a starting point of 38% for men and 12 % for women.
 Raised school enrollment by 460 %. 7
 Catby
 WRIGLEY BOVH1
 Economists are starting to suspect
 PH:0
 a ও
 Uncle
 Bens
 Coca-Cola
 UR
 Hellrgg's
 C
 Triscul
 PREMIUM
 that unions were a better deal than
 MARS
 PEPSICO
 KRAFT
 NAM
 Hoc
 enco ucoss
 textbooks made them out to be
 S
 JELLO
 rer NESTEA
 NESCAFE
 "YOU NEED TO HIT THE
 BRICKS' TO FIND WORK.
 THAT'S WHAT IDID"
 Thsters
 CHOe
 P&G
 :Nestle
 EPELLECRIN
 Johmenohmon
 MAKES YOU BORROW
 Unilevey
 Vittel
 IATSE
 TUITION MONEY AT 8.9%
 Rete EECC
 @IATSE
 S
 LOREAL
 "AT MY FIRST JOBIONLY GROWS UP IN ONE OF THE
 WORLD'S BEST
 ECONOMIES
 Sipleraia
 IAMS
 २
 Nestl
 PEpaonFNT
 GARNGR VICHY
 Gral
 Crast
 Neuragen
 10RTS
 DAWN de
 MADE $15K A YEAR."
 MdvENIC
 Dfabr
 Lrke
 Visne vizoral
 Cascade
 Douny
 IVORY JOy
 Scope
 Fiodent
 OMBSEE
 MMAYCCLLIE Kes
 GAUL
 dir
 ONETOUCH BAND-AID
 It's almost as if-bear with me for a
 un Provided secondary education as a right as well as a cost of living stipend to
 BOUDN
 Pepte
 vieks
 Chetmate
 TYLEWOL RERE
 Motri epcid
 PRINA
 ஒதல்
 students maintaining a 'B' average.. 8
 Heavily subsidized early childcare. Fees for pre-schools didn't exceed 2-3 % of
 family income and 50 % of urban and 33% of rural children attended day-care,
 compared to 10 % in the US overall.9
 and Eliminated the gender pay gap.
 CONTRGR
 second people with power and
 SULAFLD Id u
 Gilete Ce
 Se TAMPAX
 abaysPampers
 Existential Comics @existentialcoms Aug 29
 Stockholders have an incentive to drive wages down. Landlords have an incentive
 to drive rent up. These two groups own basically everything, and control most of
 our society and politics.
 cantic NoaDua
 RunLa
 a
 rsum
 DURACELL
 PUR
 BOSS
 DIESEL
 PANTENE
 LACOSTE
 ALPU
 11xe alnd
 BRAUN
 money conspired to create an
 economic situation that enabled them
 Sources: 1. A. Szymanski, On the Uses of Disinformotion to Legitimize Revival of the Cold War: Health and the USSR
 Science and Society, Winter, 1981.2. Corrigan, Philip, Ramsay, Harvie and Sayer, Derek, Bolshevism and the USSR, New
 Left Review, No. 125, January-February, 1981. 3, 8, and 9. George, Vic and Manning, Nick, Socialism, Social Welfare
 and the Soviet Union, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980. 4. Gregory, Paul R. and Stuart, Robert C., Soviet
 Economic Structure and Performance, New York: Harper and Row, 1974. 5. Sivard, Rugh Legar, World Mlitary and
 Social Expenditures, Leeburg, Virginia: WMSE Publications, 1980. 6. Mickiewicz, Ruth, Handbook of Soviet Social
 Science Dato, New York: Free Press, 1973. 7. Central Statistical Board of the USSR, The USSR in Figures for 1978,
 Moscow Statisika Publishers, 1978. 10. St. George, George, Our Soviet Sister, New York: Robert B. Luce, 1973
 to keep more of their power and
 CREATES THE WORST
 But yes, immigrants are to blame.
 money, at the expense of the workers
 who made their success possible.
 IN 1979 THAT WAS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY THE
 EQUIVALENT OF $47K.
 WORLD HAS EVER SEEN
 t 2.1K
 5.7K
 43
 Cumulative percent change since 1948
What was the eureka moment or realization that turned YOU into a socialist?

What was the eureka moment or realization that turned YOU into a socialist?

Love, London, and Sassy: London Fog. She is sassy as hell and I love her.
Love, London, and Sassy: London Fog. She is sassy as hell and I love her.

London Fog. She is sassy as hell and I love her.

Being Alone, Bad, and Complex: 74 points 13 hours ago Edit see my self reply below for explanation of why this comment examines what it does while ignoring other important areas of this broad and complex problem. I think this should also make us more sympathetic to the enormity of the choices we casually foisted on our ancestors, and made them responsible for. (And I am not here diminishing the magnitude of past genocides; on the contrary, I mean to emphasize them.) With this data, the only moral choice directly available to stop this is war: invasion of China by other powers, and imposition of martial law to the extent that victims of these policies are freed and their unjust suffering given reparation (insofar as this sort of thing is even possible much about suffering cannot be undone, and certainly you cannot pay for the dead in a way that makes up for their loss to the living) Because that is what we mean by "responsible", right? That our ancestors stood by as the Holocaust or some other genocide unfolded, and allowed it to continue. Certainly there are other ways of bringing pressure against nation- states, but there is little hope of gaining the sort of international unity that could make this effective against a state with an economy as diversified as China's. Only war is credible here, because other countries would suffer incredible deprivation by opposing China, and worry about the unequal competition with other nations that choose to continue reading with China. (Sanctions work to a degree against Russia, but people should understand that this is because of its much less diversified economy hitting on just one or two coordinated fronts is very effective, and Russia does not have reliable capital (money/asset) protection, making asset seizing/freezing in finance hubs like London and the U.S. effective. Additionally, their "best" goods, such as natural gas, can be gotten from elsewhere, albeit not as cheaply, giving huge importers of those resources like Germany enormous leverage not buying starts a price spiral that hurts Russia far more than Germany China, on the other hand, is a linchpin of the global economy, and in many areas is essentially the sole provider of many rare raw materials, like rare earth magnets used in electronics, as well as many manifactured goods. Its economy is also roughly self-sufficient it can technically feed itself and outfit armies start to finish in a pinch, even if that's far from ideal economically. As a result, and in addition to its unique and historically unprecedented role in the global economy (no nation has ever worn this many hats in this particular way) most economic options for political pressure actually hurt everyone else much more than China, which completely changes the calculus. That in turn makes those economic options for diplomacy largely ineffective even if you can get countries on-board, which you basically can't. Ever wonder why we hear about strict sanctions on small or isolated countries like Cuba/North Korea, or global powers like Russia, but not really China? That's why. Not very effective, hurts everyone else more, and too many countries fear not having access to the Chinese economy/competing against other countries that are happy to continue importing inexpensive Chinese goods. This is one reason why China insists on domestic companies only at the helm of its economy, and/or forces technology transfers and domestic partnerships on any Western company entering its market, and probably the most important one. Many centuries of subjugation by Western powers through economic warfare has hardened its resolve to not be vulnerable to this problem ever again. So this circumstance is not coincidental in the least, and it limits what political levers other nations can apply to China without war. Paradoxically, this increases instability in a way, from a global perspective because it means conflict resolution short of war is very difficult to force China to the table on, as we have frequently seen when China ignores international treaties with impunity.) But an actual war, a real war, a war that would not stop until these oppressed peoples were free would lead to unimaginable suffering on a global scale. The refugees alone would overwhelm the stability of East Asia/Central Europe Millions at least would die directly in war, even if China did not ultimately result to nuclear weapons, or other weapons of mass destruction. They are a great power on the way to becoming a global superpower the world has not seen a conflict like that since WW2, even if only the U.S. and China fought (and certainly other nations would be drawn in, including at minimum former superpower Russia, and North Korea, where Chinese divisions decimated American forces during the Korean War at troop strength rations of 12 divisions or more to each American division) The world has never seen the central nations of a globally interconnected world economy at war. The amount of knock on suffering caused by that economic turmoil is probably incalculable. The Great Recession in 2012 would look tiny in comparison. (The limited trade war initiated by President Trump is already having global impacts on the economy, and that is simply tariff trading, not complete disconnection and war.) And if I focus on the U.S. here, it's primarily for two reasons: One, because it is the superpower that made human rights a matter of politics, after the Holocaust. Before its global hegemony, and the catastrophe that brought it to the head of that hegemony, what a nation did to its people was considered its own business. This is to both its glory and its shame: a rare international and historical triumph of morality to be responsible for, and a magnification of the shame of its own human rights abuses, and its intermittent strategic befriending of those who have committed them already. (For example, how many people know that it is the U.S. that forced Britain to divest its empire, and allow the independent self-determination of its subjugated peoples? This was a direct requirement imposed by the United States if Britain wanted to be included at the treaty after the end of WW2. The U.S. also directly and successfully opposed Anglo-Soviet plans for carving up other countries as spoils of war, notwithstanding the annexations the Soviet Union began before the treaty was even concluded and continued in the immediate aftermath. Consider also things like the Alien Torts act, a statute that underwent a legal revival in the modern era, in which U.S. courts allowed foreigners to bring suits against other foreigners for crimes against humanity committed in foreign countries a more substantial threat to dictators than it might seem, due to the U.S.'s role as a global finance and capital hub, which meant assets of dictators or other person's could be frozen or seized by court order, and travel to the U.S. impossible in practice.) People focus on the hypocrisy of the U.S. here, but honestly, it is not the hypocrisy that is remarkable at all. We would expect nations to do nasty things in their own interest, and they usually do. It is a little remarked on miracle that the U.S. is directly responsible for human rights being seen as legitimate political objective at all; it was and is a completely unprecedented occurrence in human history. The second reason is that it is only the U.S. that would have a credible chance of invading China and succeeding and odds are quite good that even this "credible chance" would end in failure, as force projection for a smalll amount of time anywhere in the world (the specialty of the U.S., and its expertise by far) is much different than total war predicated on supply chains thousands of miles long. (Where this is occurring in China is possibly one of the the worst places for it to occur, too, in terms of this military difficulty.) Even a multinational force of smaller nations with modern militaries would pose no credible threat of total war on China; such is the state of her military power already at this early date in her rise. Even a truly global coalition (i.e. not a nominally global but practically unilateral coalition like the one that invaded Iraq in 2003), has a moderate chance of failure- China's geography in particular disfavors any inland invasion coming from the sea. Without the U.S., any such effort is likely doomed to failure. So the problem is especially acute: the sole actor that can add the value needed to make the conflict worthwhile has a lonely spotlight to sit under. Only it can credibly act, and hence it alone must also carry the shame of inaction, if chosen. With great power comes great responsibility, as Uncle Ben noted.. How terrible are the options we are left with. To let the innocent suffer and be effectively silent (what good does awareness without change do?), or to wage war and cause equal or worse suffering, but arguably as moral victors. As someone who fought in a war much more limited and low intensity than this, I cannot express just how much misery war results in. It is never an option to be chosen lightly. There are literally no winners in war other than armament industries and nation-statess moneyed interests and abstractions, and maybe in very rare cases, future generations. Every actual person involved loses, even as the victors. I don't even know whether to be disappointed in us all. I am sure no war will come, but is this a good thing or a bad thing? Are we too standing by during the Holocaust? Such an ugly and dispiriting circumstance. I feel like it gives me more sympathy for the onlookers who, still scarred by wW1, and even threatened themselves, were still too skittish for war. And of course even more sympathy for the victims of that genocide, and that war, and their modern day counterparts. My heart cries out for these people. They live between what is, for other nations, the frying pan and the fire. permalink embed unsave parent report give award reply - 23 points 12 hours ago Minor note as reply to myself (other comment already at character limit): I am not ignoring the evidence of China's internal struggle over this, a struggle that may (we can only hope) eventually result in the freedom of these people being persecuted for practicing their religion peacefully. Rather, I am focusing on one aspect of the issue: the position of Western, non-China nations in this equation, as well as their available options for resolution This is certainly a much broader issue than that, and China's internal politics, as well as the victims themselves, are more important and central than what I chose to examine here. The reason for my narrow focus was simply this: thinking about what we, as people of Western nations, can actually and directly do (as opposed to any options that rely on China deciding on her own agency to stop), if we agree that responsibility falls on our shoulders when known genocide is met with inaction, as is mentioned in the submission statement For a number of reasons, some of which I gave here, I am fairly sure that war is the only directly efficacious means of ensuring that aim China may or may not change her internal policy, but if she does, it won't be because of Western economic or political pressure. Hence, if it is true we are morally responsible for inaction during genocide, it seems that in this case it would mean a moral obligation to go to war: an option with its own extremes of suffering, and nearly guaranteed to be a calamity of global scope. Which is not very different at all from WW2, as it was then: the war that eventually did occur was in fact a global calamity, and hence the choice that we fault our ancestors for not going to war over human rights is very similar to what we exp to see the war that would have resulted, for other reasons. And hence the now, except we opportunity to see just how much suffering a choice to make war over genocide would have created, if our ancestors had actually acted. This extremely unappetizing choice, between "moral" war and immoral inaction, is what prompted my comment permalink embed save parent report give award reply Troubled redditor pens a long essay on whether the "Western nations" have the "moral obligation" of invading China in order to "stop genocide"
Being Alone, Bad, and Complex: 74 points 13 hours ago
 Edit see my self reply below for explanation of why this comment examines what it does while ignoring other
 important areas of this broad and complex problem.
 I think this should also make us more sympathetic to the enormity of the choices we casually foisted on our
 ancestors, and made them responsible for. (And I am not here diminishing the magnitude of past genocides; on the
 contrary, I mean to emphasize them.)
 With this data, the only moral choice directly available to stop this is war: invasion of China by other powers, and
 imposition of martial law to the extent that victims of these policies are freed and their unjust suffering given
 reparation (insofar as this sort of thing is even possible much about suffering cannot be undone, and certainly you
 cannot pay for the dead in a way that makes up for their loss to the living)
 Because that is what we mean by "responsible", right? That our ancestors stood by as the Holocaust or some other
 genocide unfolded, and allowed it to continue. Certainly there are other ways of bringing pressure against nation-
 states, but there is little hope of gaining the sort of international unity that could make this effective against a state
 with an economy as diversified as China's. Only war is credible here, because other countries would suffer incredible
 deprivation by opposing China, and worry about the unequal competition with other nations that choose to continue
 reading with China.
 (Sanctions work to a degree against Russia, but people should understand that this is because of its much less
 diversified economy hitting on just one or two coordinated fronts is very effective, and Russia does not have reliable
 capital (money/asset) protection, making asset seizing/freezing in finance hubs like London and the U.S. effective.
 Additionally, their "best" goods, such as natural gas, can be gotten from elsewhere, albeit not as cheaply, giving huge
 importers of those resources like Germany enormous leverage not buying starts a price spiral that hurts Russia far
 more than Germany
 China, on the other hand, is a linchpin of the global economy, and in many areas is essentially the sole provider of
 many rare raw materials, like rare earth magnets used in electronics, as well as many manifactured goods. Its economy
 is also roughly self-sufficient it can technically feed itself and outfit armies start to finish in a pinch, even if that's far
 from ideal economically. As a result, and in addition to its unique and historically unprecedented role in the global
 economy (no nation has ever worn this many hats in this particular way) most economic options for political
 pressure actually hurt everyone else much more than China, which completely changes the calculus.
 That in turn makes those economic options for diplomacy largely ineffective even if you can get countries on-board,
 which you basically can't. Ever wonder why we hear about strict sanctions on small or isolated countries like
 Cuba/North Korea, or global powers like Russia, but not really China? That's why. Not very effective, hurts everyone
 else more, and too many countries fear not having access to the Chinese economy/competing against other countries
 that are happy to continue importing inexpensive Chinese goods.
 This is one reason why China insists on domestic companies only at the helm of its economy, and/or forces technology
 transfers and domestic partnerships on any Western company entering its market, and probably the most important
 one. Many centuries of subjugation by Western powers through economic warfare has hardened its resolve to not be
 vulnerable to this problem ever again. So this circumstance is not coincidental in the least, and it limits what political
 levers other nations can apply to China without war. Paradoxically, this increases instability in a way, from a global
 perspective because it means conflict resolution short of war is very difficult to force China to the table on, as we
 have frequently seen when China ignores international treaties with impunity.)
 But an actual war, a real war, a war that would not stop until these oppressed peoples were free would lead to
 unimaginable suffering on a global scale. The refugees alone would overwhelm the stability of East Asia/Central
 Europe
 Millions at least would die directly in war, even if China did not ultimately result to nuclear weapons, or other weapons
 of mass destruction. They are a great power on the way to becoming a global superpower the world has not seen a
 conflict like that since WW2, even if only the U.S. and China fought (and certainly other nations would be drawn in,
 including at minimum former superpower Russia, and North Korea, where Chinese divisions decimated American forces
 during the Korean War at troop strength rations of 12 divisions or more to each American division)
 The world has never seen the central nations of a globally interconnected world economy at war. The amount of knock
 on suffering caused by that economic turmoil is probably incalculable. The Great Recession in 2012 would look tiny in
 comparison. (The limited trade war initiated by President Trump is already having global impacts on the economy, and
 that is simply tariff trading, not complete disconnection and war.)
 And if I focus on the U.S. here, it's primarily for two reasons:
 One, because it is the superpower that made human rights a matter of politics, after the Holocaust. Before its global
 hegemony, and the catastrophe that brought it to the head of that hegemony, what a nation did to its people was
 considered its own business. This is to both its glory and its shame: a rare international and historical triumph of
 morality to be responsible for, and a magnification of the shame of its own human rights abuses, and its intermittent
 strategic befriending of those who have committed them already.
 (For example, how many people know that it is the U.S. that forced Britain to divest its empire, and allow the
 independent self-determination of its subjugated peoples? This was a direct requirement imposed by the United
 States if Britain wanted to be included at the treaty after the end of WW2. The U.S. also directly and successfully
 opposed Anglo-Soviet plans for carving up other countries as spoils of war, notwithstanding the annexations the
 Soviet Union began before the treaty was even concluded and continued in the immediate aftermath. Consider also
 things like the Alien Torts act, a statute that underwent a legal revival in the modern era, in which U.S. courts allowed
 foreigners to bring suits against other foreigners for crimes against humanity committed in foreign countries a more
 substantial threat to dictators than it might seem, due to the U.S.'s role as a global finance and capital hub, which
 meant assets of dictators or other person's could be frozen or seized by court order, and travel to the U.S. impossible
 in practice.)
 People focus on the hypocrisy of the U.S. here, but honestly, it is not the hypocrisy that is remarkable at all. We would
 expect nations to do nasty things in their own interest, and they usually do. It is a little remarked on miracle that the
 U.S. is directly responsible for human rights being seen as legitimate political objective at all; it was and is a completely
 unprecedented occurrence in human history.
 The second reason is that it is only the U.S. that would have a credible chance of invading China and succeeding and
 odds are quite good that even this "credible chance" would end in failure, as force projection for a smalll amount of
 time anywhere in the world (the specialty of the U.S., and its expertise by far) is much different than total war
 predicated on supply chains thousands of miles long. (Where this is occurring in China is possibly one of the the worst
 places for it to occur, too, in terms of this military difficulty.)
 Even a multinational force of smaller nations with modern militaries would pose no credible threat of total war on
 China; such is the state of her military power already at this early date in her rise. Even a truly global coalition (i.e. not
 a nominally global but practically unilateral coalition like the one that invaded Iraq in 2003), has a moderate chance of
 failure- China's geography in particular disfavors any inland invasion coming from the sea. Without the U.S., any such
 effort is likely doomed to failure.
 So the problem is especially acute: the sole actor that can add the value needed to make the conflict worthwhile has a
 lonely spotlight to sit under. Only it can credibly act, and hence it alone must also carry the shame of inaction, if
 chosen. With great power comes great responsibility, as Uncle Ben noted..
 How terrible are the options we are left with. To let the innocent suffer and be effectively silent (what good does
 awareness without change do?), or to wage war and cause equal or worse suffering, but arguably as moral victors.
 As someone who fought in a war much more limited and low intensity than this, I cannot express just how much
 misery war results in. It is never an option to be chosen lightly. There are literally no winners in war other than
 armament industries and nation-statess moneyed interests and abstractions, and maybe in very rare cases, future
 generations. Every actual person involved loses, even as the victors.
 I don't even know whether to be disappointed in us all. I am sure no war will come, but is this a good thing or a bad
 thing? Are we too standing by during the Holocaust?
 Such an ugly and dispiriting circumstance. I feel like it gives me more sympathy for the onlookers who, still scarred by
 wW1, and even threatened themselves, were still too skittish for war. And of course even more sympathy for the
 victims of that genocide, and that war, and their modern day counterparts. My heart cries out for these people. They
 live between what is, for other nations, the frying pan and the fire.
 permalink embed unsave parent report give award reply
 -
 23 points 12 hours ago
 Minor note as reply to myself (other comment already at character limit):
 I am not ignoring the evidence of China's internal struggle over this, a struggle that may (we can only hope) eventually
 result in the freedom of these people being persecuted for practicing their religion peacefully.
 Rather, I am focusing on one aspect of the issue: the position of Western, non-China nations in this equation, as well
 as their available options for resolution
 This is certainly a much broader issue than that, and China's internal politics, as well as the victims themselves, are
 more important and central than what I chose to examine here.
 The reason for my narrow focus was simply this: thinking about what we, as people of Western nations, can actually
 and directly do (as opposed to any options that rely on China deciding on her own agency to stop), if we agree that
 responsibility falls on our shoulders when known genocide is met with inaction, as is mentioned in the submission
 statement
 For a number of reasons, some of which I gave here, I am fairly sure that war is the only directly efficacious means of
 ensuring that aim China may or may not change her internal policy, but if she does, it won't be because of Western
 economic or political pressure.
 Hence, if it is true we are morally responsible for inaction during genocide, it seems that in this case it would mean a
 moral obligation to go to war: an option with its own extremes of suffering, and nearly guaranteed to be a calamity of
 global scope.
 Which is not very different at all from WW2, as it was then: the war that eventually did occur was in fact a global
 calamity, and hence the choice that we fault our ancestors for not going to war over human rights is very similar to
 what we exp
 to see the war that would have resulted, for other reasons. And hence the
 now, except we
 opportunity to see just how much suffering a choice to make war over genocide would have created, if our ancestors
 had actually acted.
 This extremely unappetizing choice, between "moral" war and immoral inaction, is what prompted my comment
 permalink embed save parent report give award reply
Troubled redditor pens a long essay on whether the "Western nations" have the "moral obligation" of invading China in order to "stop genocide"

Troubled redditor pens a long essay on whether the "Western nations" have the "moral obligation" of invading China in order to "stop genocid...

Chelsea, Club, and Crime: TUESDAY MAY 22 2018 The Stonde to hometown club Paris Saint-Germain MOur esa Pogba's future in his hands EPL as been .KE There were tises where w7pyinc Iwas on the bench he saidThere waS a lot of talk people thought it wasn' wokine out, but a coach and a player don't have to be best friends, we dont hve to go to restau ork toethe The French star evasive over Man United stay, Chelsea owners Abramovich British visa runs out. oaidas MAN By AFP sparttaa d.c Elsewhere Riussian state media on Sunday cited an unconfirmed report that Chelsea football club owner Roman Abramovich's Brit- ish visa has run out, while rants togethey Paul Pcb bas refused to nule out a moe away from Manchester United hinting at strains in his relationship with Jose Mourinho after a cifficult season at Old Traf end he 589 millio2 France national has had a second season back at being left out of the CHEVROLET his spokesman declined to comment Russian state news agen y TASS and other media picked up a report on The substituted early Bell website, which said an acquaintance of Abramovich and two in his inner circle licly questioned had told it the billionaire's ution, while British visa ran out three efuses to die weeks ago and he is waiting es OCCasions Mour- for a new one nch televi Amid a spiralling diplo Plus if he matic crisis between Britain ted play and Russia over the poison- eclined ing of a former Russian dou- ble agent, there have been re of calls in Britain for sanctions that would hurt super-rich Russians who have homes in Con o London. British Security Minister Ben Wallace in February said Russian oligarchs sus pected of corruption would e forced to explain their cealth in a new clampdown organised crime. 71 15% racy % is 43 balls Thanks, I hate pogba's future
Chelsea, Club, and Crime: TUESDAY MAY 22 2018 The Stonde
 to hometown club Paris Saint-Germain
 MOur
 esa
 Pogba's future
 in his hands
 EPL as been
 .KE
 There were tises where
 w7pyinc Iwas on the
 bench he saidThere waS
 a lot of talk people thought
 it wasn' wokine out, but a
 coach and a player don't
 have to be best friends, we
 dont hve to go to restau
 ork toethe
 The French star
 evasive over Man
 United stay, Chelsea
 owners Abramovich
 British visa runs out.
 oaidas
 MAN
 By AFP
 sparttaa d.c
 Elsewhere Riussian state
 media on Sunday cited an
 unconfirmed report that
 Chelsea football club owner
 Roman Abramovich's Brit-
 ish visa has run out, while
 rants togethey
 Paul Pcb bas refused to
 nule out a moe away from
 Manchester United hinting
 at strains in his relationship
 with Jose Mourinho after a
 cifficult season at Old Traf
 end
 he 589 millio2 France
 national has had a
 second season back at
 being left out of the
 CHEVROLET
 his spokesman declined to
 comment
 Russian state news agen
 y TASS and other media
 picked up a report on The
 substituted early Bell website, which said an
 acquaintance of Abramovich
 and two in his inner circle
 licly questioned had told it the billionaire's
 ution, while British visa ran out three
 efuses to die weeks ago and he is waiting
 es
 OCCasions Mour-
 for a new one
 nch televi
 Amid a spiralling diplo
 Plus if he matic crisis between Britain
 ted play and Russia over the poison-
 eclined ing of a former Russian dou-
 ble agent, there have been
 re of calls in Britain for sanctions
 that would hurt super-rich
 Russians who have homes in
 Con
 o London.
 British Security Minister
 Ben Wallace in February
 said Russian oligarchs sus
 pected of corruption would
 e forced to explain their
 cealth in a new clampdown
 organised crime.
 71
 15%
 racy %
 is
 43
 balls
Thanks, I hate pogba's future

Thanks, I hate pogba's future

Barcelona, Bitch, and Empire: Hitler I want the biggest Europe's empire! DAS GROSSDEUTSCHE REICH 1944 SCHWEDEN Verwaltungsgliederung der NSDAP. OSTLAND DANEMARK OSTSEE NORDSEE WEISSRUTHENIEN NIEDER- LANDE Distrikt Warschau Distrikt Lublin WOLHYNIEN Arbeitsbereich BELGIEN Distrikt Radom Generalgouver nement Distrikt Galizien SLOWAKEI RUMA NIEN FRANKREICH UNGARN LIECHTE SCHWEIZ PERES ITALIEN KROATIEN ADRIATISCHES Stand: 1. Marz 1944 kaichebah Napoleon Bitch please KINGDO KINGD O M EUROPE IN 1812 NORWAY Personal union vh De unl 1814 SWEDEN Kalmar French Empire in 1804 Eduburgh French territorial acquisitions after 1804 l and Dunaburg States dependent on Napoleon KING D M UNITED KING DOM F GREAT BRTAN AND York REAND France and its alles befare Napoleon's Russian Campaign in 1812 8 AL Banhol MAR Confederation of the Rhine in 1812 Tlar Vilna Dablin Continental system since 1806/1807 Friedany Minsk Heligoland Rep or Danzig X. OF PR US SIA Thare Kie Cark NORTH SEADE Hambg Bremen 1810 Sp Bilystok Pinsk ATLANTIC RUSSIAN DUCHY gw Berln London Minster Posen Hanover WARSAW Personal union vith Sasgny 1807-1813 E MP RE Dover Volhyeia OCEAN Lepsig Kassel Erfurt Kiev Boutze) Glogu ulogne ఊ Dresden Guemsey CONFEDTRALION OF THE RHINE Nuremberg Brody Lomberg Frkfurt Ekaterinoslav dersey Lbourg Amiens Tamopal Behmia Olm Mainz Ukrain Podolia Rennes Brünn Austeple EMPIRE egent Suigart Nantes A Orléans B ulk ing e Pasburg OF E M PIRE Munich Austria odessa AUSTRIA O F FRAN CE Neuchdnel Zuich IT r Transylvania Klagenfr Geneva H 1610 Sevasopol 1810 kINGDOM6 Lyons Agron Slaven Braa Temesvar Auio beste 1809 BLACK SEA Sinope Lo Conuta w৯।। h।এ Vassal principalty Buchare MonITAL Valence 1805 Bologna Belgrade Serbja Sdisria Bayoe Vitoria Toulouse a Marino Burgos Lutco o07 708 Vama Pamplond Oporto Rep of Andorra Mdhelle on Bulgaria O Sofia KINGDOM Zarogoso, 1812 Barcelona Adhanople Constantinople 1809 MaddF SPAIN Toledo Araniue C o Ajaccio Ved Angora Macedonia Solenica Pontecarvo Badale Bursa leoric slands P Minorca M Naples APLES Volencia IR E KINGDOM OF sARDINIA Bailin Carts Seville Thessals Smyma Granada т E Adala Plerm KINGDOMO GILY Messina Gerahar Morea Tangier Ceuta Algers thode Pen de Velez Meldla MOROCCO AGERIA Crete Romans BITCH PLEASE LEMPIRE ROMAIN en 118 apr. J.-C. Londinium GERMANIE INF 0,Col Moantiacum Lutecia GERMANIE SUP RHETIE Augusta Treveronum LUGDUNAISE Augusta Viedelicorum NORIQUE Apunum Lugdanum AQUITAINE Tolosa CEAN ATLANTIQUE Burdigala DACIE Viminacium NARBONAISE Narbo PONT EUXIN Sirmium DALMATIE O Tomis Ravenne o Trapezus BITHYNIE ET PO Ancyre GALICIE MESIE SUP MESIE INF ITALIE Byzance THRACE Dytachium MACEDOINE Thessalonique Aleria Oome Tarraco CAPPADOCE Tarentum Heapolis ASIE Buthrotum 92otphese CILICIE Caralis SYRIE Athènes CorintheO o Hova Carthago Tharsus O LYCIE PAMPHYLIE Timglo Antioche Caesarea Utique OPalimyre SICILE Paphos CHYPRE NUMIDIE Carthago CRETE MAURETANIE o Bosra Gortyne MER MEDITERRANNEE JUDEE AFRIQUE PROCONSULAIRE Jérusalem O 1: ALPES MARITIMES Pétra Alexandrie.. 2:ALPES COTTIENNES Cyrène ARABIE O Leptis Magna 3: ALPES PENNINES CYRENAIQUE Memphis in hcipalay onian NISIA NON BELGIQUE MER ROUGE ÉGYPTE DAIGNE TARRACONAISE LUSITANIE Roman power
Barcelona, Bitch, and Empire: Hitler I want the biggest Europe's empire!
 DAS GROSSDEUTSCHE REICH 1944
 SCHWEDEN
 Verwaltungsgliederung der NSDAP.
 OSTLAND
 DANEMARK
 OSTSEE
 NORDSEE
 WEISSRUTHENIEN
 NIEDER-
 LANDE
 Distrikt Warschau
 Distrikt Lublin
 WOLHYNIEN
 Arbeitsbereich
 BELGIEN
 Distrikt Radom
 Generalgouver nement
 Distrikt Galizien
 SLOWAKEI
 RUMA
 NIEN
 FRANKREICH
 UNGARN
 LIECHTE
 SCHWEIZ
 PERES
 ITALIEN
 KROATIEN
 ADRIATISCHES
 Stand: 1. Marz 1944
 kaichebah
 Napoleon Bitch please
 KINGDO
 KINGD O M
 EUROPE IN 1812
 NORWAY
 Personal union vh De
 unl 1814
 SWEDEN
 Kalmar
 French Empire in 1804
 Eduburgh
 French territorial acquisitions after 1804
 l and
 Dunaburg
 States dependent on Napoleon
 KING D M
 UNITED KING DOM
 F
 GREAT BRTAN
 AND York
 REAND
 France and its alles befare
 Napoleon's Russian Campaign in 1812
 8 AL
 Banhol
 MAR
 Confederation of the Rhine in 1812
 Tlar
 Vilna
 Dablin
 Continental system since 1806/1807
 Friedany
 Minsk
 Heligoland
 Rep or
 Danzig
 X. OF PR US SIA
 Thare
 Kie
 Cark
 NORTH SEADE
 Hambg
 Bremen
 1810
 Sp
 Bilystok
 Pinsk
 ATLANTIC
 RUSSIAN
 DUCHY gw
 Berln
 London
 Minster
 Posen
 Hanover
 WARSAW
 Personal union vith Sasgny
 1807-1813
 E MP RE
 Dover
 Volhyeia
 OCEAN
 Lepsig
 Kassel
 Erfurt
 Kiev
 Boutze) Glogu
 ulogne
 ఊ
 Dresden
 Guemsey
 CONFEDTRALION
 OF THE
 RHINE
 Nuremberg
 Brody
 Lomberg
 Frkfurt
 Ekaterinoslav
 dersey
 Lbourg
 Amiens
 Tamopal
 Behmia Olm
 Mainz
 Ukrain
 Podolia
 Rennes
 Brünn
 Austeple
 EMPIRE
 egent
 Suigart
 Nantes
 A Orléans
 B ulk
 ing
 e Pasburg OF
 E M PIRE
 Munich
 Austria
 odessa
 AUSTRIA
 O F
 FRAN CE
 Neuchdnel
 Zuich
 IT
 r
 Transylvania
 Klagenfr
 Geneva
 H
 1610
 Sevasopol
 1810
 kINGDOM6
 Lyons
 Agron
 Slaven
 Braa
 Temesvar
 Auio
 beste
 1809
 BLACK SEA
 Sinope
 Lo Conuta
 w৯।। h।এ
 Vassal principalty
 Buchare
 MonITAL
 Valence
 1805 Bologna
 Belgrade
 Serbja
 Sdisria
 Bayoe
 Vitoria
 Toulouse
 a Marino
 Burgos
 Lutco
 o07 708
 Vama
 Pamplond
 Oporto
 Rep of
 Andorra
 Mdhelle
 on
 Bulgaria
 O
 Sofia
 KINGDOM
 Zarogoso,
 1812
 Barcelona
 Adhanople
 Constantinople
 1809
 MaddF
 SPAIN
 Toledo Araniue
 C o
 Ajaccio
 Ved
 Angora
 Macedonia
 Solenica
 Pontecarvo
 Badale
 Bursa
 leoric slands
 P Minorca
 M
 Naples APLES
 Volencia
 IR E
 KINGDOM OF
 sARDINIA
 Bailin
 Carts
 Seville
 Thessals
 Smyma
 Granada
 т
 E
 Adala
 Plerm
 KINGDOMO
 GILY
 Messina
 Gerahar
 Morea
 Tangier
 Ceuta
 Algers
 thode
 Pen
 de Velez Meldla
 MOROCCO
 AGERIA
 Crete
 Romans BITCH PLEASE
 LEMPIRE ROMAIN
 en 118 apr. J.-C.
 Londinium
 GERMANIE
 INF 0,Col
 Moantiacum
 Lutecia
 GERMANIE SUP
 RHETIE
 Augusta
 Treveronum
 LUGDUNAISE
 Augusta
 Viedelicorum
 NORIQUE
 Apunum
 Lugdanum
 AQUITAINE
 Tolosa
 CEAN ATLANTIQUE
 Burdigala
 DACIE
 Viminacium
 NARBONAISE
 Narbo
 PONT EUXIN
 Sirmium
 DALMATIE
 O Tomis
 Ravenne o
 Trapezus
 BITHYNIE ET PO
 Ancyre
 GALICIE
 MESIE SUP
 MESIE INF
 ITALIE
 Byzance
 THRACE
 Dytachium
 MACEDOINE
 Thessalonique
 Aleria
 Oome
 Tarraco
 CAPPADOCE
 Tarentum
 Heapolis
 ASIE
 Buthrotum
 92otphese
 CILICIE
 Caralis
 SYRIE
 Athènes
 CorintheO o
 Hova Carthago
 Tharsus O
 LYCIE
 PAMPHYLIE
 Timglo
 Antioche
 Caesarea
 Utique
 OPalimyre
 SICILE
 Paphos
 CHYPRE
 NUMIDIE
 Carthago
 CRETE
 MAURETANIE
 o Bosra
 Gortyne
 MER MEDITERRANNEE
 JUDEE
 AFRIQUE PROCONSULAIRE
 Jérusalem O
 1: ALPES MARITIMES
 Pétra
 Alexandrie..
 2:ALPES COTTIENNES
 Cyrène
 ARABIE O
 Leptis Magna
 3: ALPES PENNINES
 CYRENAIQUE
 Memphis
 in
 hcipalay
 onian
 NISIA
 NON
 BELGIQUE
 MER ROUGE
 ÉGYPTE
 DAIGNE
 TARRACONAISE
 LUSITANIE
Roman power

Roman power