Frightened
Frightened

Frightened

The
The

The

That
That

That

When
When

When

Safety
Safety

Safety

And
And

And

Regretment
Regretment

Regretment

Because Im
Because Im

Because Im

Liking
Liking

Liking

out
out

out

🔥 | Latest

Match, Vector, and Std: me C++ Remembering emins colo _cnu cxx: :operator=-(const -gnu_cxx:: normal iteratora, const-gnu_cxx:: normal_iterator&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_iterator.h:799:5: note: template bool ーgnu_cxx: : operator== (const-gnu. cxx: :一normaliterator8, const-gnu_cxx: : normal_iterator&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl algo.h:190:4: error: no match for operator-' in c-first.-gnu_cxx: :_normaliterator : :operator* [with-Iterator = std::vector*, Container std ::vector >, 一gnu_cxx ::-normaliterator: :reference std ::vector&]() = = == va /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl algo.h:190:4: /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl pai std::pair&, const std: pai es are :201:5 note: templ ate bool std::operator(const /usr/inclu 幵74.6/bits/st4 erator .h:285: 5 : templa bool note: const std: :reverse iterator&) std::operator /usr/include/c++/4.6/ std::operator- (const std: tl iterato h:335:5: note: template bool iterator&, const std::reverse_it usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/al1 :122:5: note: template bool std::operator-(const td: allocator&, const std::allocator usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/allocator.h:127 std:allocator&, const std::allocator&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_vector.h:1273:5: note: template bool std: :operator (const std: vector&, const std::vector&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/ext/new_allocator.h:123:5: note: template bool 一gnu_cxx : :operator=-(const-gnu_cxx ::new allocator&, cor-gnu_cxx : : new-allocator&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl iterator.h:805:5: note: template bool ーgnu_cxx : :operator-(const-gnu_cxx ::-normal-i erator8, const-gnu_cxx:: mplate bool std::o normal_iterator&) /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl iterator.h:799:5: note: t - nu cxx : :operator== (const _normal_iterator&) gnu cxx :: normal iterators, const gnu cxx :: It really do C like that sometimes
Match, Vector, and Std: me C++
 Remembering
 emins
 colo
 _cnu
 cxx: :operator=-(const
 -gnu_cxx::
 normal
 iteratora,
 const-gnu_cxx::
 normal_iterator&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_iterator.h:799:5: note: template bool
 ーgnu_cxx: : operator== (const-gnu. cxx: :一normaliterator8, const-gnu_cxx: :
 normal_iterator&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl algo.h:190:4: error: no match for operator-' in
 c-first.-gnu_cxx: :_normaliterator : :operator* [with-Iterator = std::vector*,
 Container
 std ::vector
 >,
 一gnu_cxx ::-normaliterator: :reference
 std ::vector&]()
 =
 =
 ==
 va
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl algo.h:190:4:
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl pai
 std::pair&, const std: pai
 es are
 :201:5 note: templ
 ate bool std::operator(const
 /usr/inclu
 幵74.6/bits/st4
 erator .h:285: 5 :
 templa
 bool
 note:
 const std: :reverse iterator&)
 std::operator
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/
 std::operator- (const std:
 tl iterato h:335:5: note: template bool
 iterator&, const std::reverse_it
 usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/al1
 :122:5: note: template bool std::operator-(const
 td: allocator&, const std::allocator
 usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/allocator.h:127
 std:allocator&, const std::allocator&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_vector.h:1273:5: note: template bool std: :operator (const
 std: vector&, const std::vector&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/ext/new_allocator.h:123:5: note: template bool
 一gnu_cxx : :operator=-(const-gnu_cxx ::new allocator&, cor-gnu_cxx : : new-allocator&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl iterator.h:805:5: note: template bool
 ーgnu_cxx : :operator-(const-gnu_cxx ::-normal-i erator8, const-gnu_cxx::
 mplate bool std::o
 normal_iterator&)
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl iterator.h:799:5: note: t
 -
 nu cxx : :operator== (const
 _normal_iterator&)
 gnu cxx ::
 normal iterators, const
 gnu cxx ::
It really do C like that sometimes

It really do C like that sometimes

God, Ignorant, and Love: HE WO MAN FE MALE HU MAN PER SON visual-poetry »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+) [vial mitosisisyourtosis men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their biological inferiority and general superfluousness this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture rhysiare Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason, because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do. 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto- Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the words he and "she in English have similar form. 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no basis in that. 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as such 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo- European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language. Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane. Swofehuper He Man Male Manson
God, Ignorant, and Love: HE
 WO MAN
 FE MALE
 HU MAN
 PER SON
 visual-poetry
 »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+)
 [vial
 mitosisisyourtosis
 men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their
 biological inferiority and general superfluousness
 this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture
 rhysiare
 Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me
 ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made
 fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason,
 because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about
 things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do.
 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which
 were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto-
 Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the
 same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of
 patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of
 English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the
 words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated
 So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the
 words he and "she in English have similar form.
 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this
 one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to
 mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male
 adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman
 respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as
 being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman
 evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes
 where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped
 its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have
 nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no
 basis in that.
 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two
 completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which
 meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella
 which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she
 where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having
 any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as
 such
 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo-
 European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly
 being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope
 here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man
 in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any
 conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of
 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck
 out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at
 this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the
 same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan
 for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks
 to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any
 meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language.
 Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within
 speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do
 fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane.
Swofehuper He Man Male Manson

Swofehuper He Man Male Manson