Please Dont
Please Dont

Please Dont

Colours
Colours

Colours

Single Ladie
Single Ladie

Single Ladie

Single Lady
Single Lady

Single Lady

ladies
ladies

ladies

that awkward moment when
 that awkward moment when

that awkward moment when

girl please
 girl please

girl please

single girl
 single girl

single girl

give up
 give up

give up

a cat
 a cat

a cat

🔥 | Latest

Innocence: WTVR CBS 6 Richmond @CBS6 Trick-or-treaters over age 12 could face fine, jail time in one Virginia city bit.ly/2yq8FTN 8:35 PM 9 Oct 2018 203 Retweets 248 Likes molly @socialistdogmom H- white people consistently overestimate the age of black children. what could go wrong WTVR CBS 6 Richmond@CBS6 Trick-or-treaters over age 12 could face fine, jail time in one Virginia city bit.ly/2yq8FTN 7:06 AM 10 Oct 2018 10,151 Retweets 32,801 Likes 缴剱@の必骖則. molly ) @socialistdogmom apa.org/news/press/rel in this study, white female undergrads overestimated the age of black teenage boys by an average of 4.5 years. these women are barely out of their teens themselves imagine how much stronger that tendency to overestimate is if you're a racist old man The students were also shown photographs alongside descriptions of various crimes and asked to assess the age and innocence of white, black or Latino boys ages 10 to 17. The students overestimated the age of blacks by an average of 4.5 years and found them more culpable than EGO DEATH or Latinos, particularly when the boys were matched with serious crimes, the study found. Researchers used questionnaires to assess the participants' prejudice and dehumanization of blacks. They found that participants who implicitly associated blacks with apes thought the black children were older and less innocent. 7:17 AM 10 Oct 2018 Kenni @ItsKenniYall Replying to @socialistdogmom When I was twelve, a woman in the grocery store asked me if my baby sister was my child 11:20 AM 10 Oct 2018 maybe they snapped @UniversalyBlack Replying to @socialistdogmom @ItsKenniYall When I was in 6th grade shopping with my MOTHER a white women came up to me and asked if I worked there barbaradeservesbetter: redpaladin-lance: blackqueerblog:what the hell I’m six years older than my step sister but people have been assuming for YEARS that she’s older than me because she’s taller than me. This is going to backfire so badly. it’s not going to backfire. they want it to turn out badly, they know what they’re doing here. it’s calculated.
Innocence: WTVR CBS 6 Richmond
 @CBS6
 Trick-or-treaters over age 12 could face fine,
 jail time in one Virginia city bit.ly/2yq8FTN
 8:35 PM 9 Oct 2018
 203 Retweets 248 Likes

 molly
 @socialistdogmom
 H-
 white people consistently overestimate
 the age of black children. what could go
 wrong
 WTVR CBS 6 Richmond@CBS6
 Trick-or-treaters over age 12 could face fine, jail time in
 one Virginia city bit.ly/2yq8FTN
 7:06 AM 10 Oct 2018
 10,151 Retweets 32,801 Likes
 缴剱@の必骖則.

 molly )
 @socialistdogmom
 apa.org/news/press/rel
 in this study, white female undergrads
 overestimated the age of black teenage
 boys by an average of 4.5 years. these
 women are barely out of their teens
 themselves imagine how much
 stronger that tendency to overestimate
 is if you're a racist old man
 The students were also shown photographs
 alongside descriptions of various crimes and
 asked to assess the age and innocence of white,
 black or Latino boys ages 10 to 17. The students
 overestimated the age of blacks by an average
 of 4.5 years and found them more culpable than
 EGO DEATH
 or Latinos, particularly when the boys
 were matched with serious crimes, the study
 found. Researchers used questionnaires to
 assess the participants' prejudice and
 dehumanization of blacks. They found that
 participants who implicitly associated blacks with
 apes thought the black children were older and
 less innocent.
 7:17 AM 10 Oct 2018

 Kenni
 @ItsKenniYall
 Replying to @socialistdogmom
 When I was twelve, a woman in the grocery
 store asked me if my baby sister was my child
 11:20 AM 10 Oct 2018

 maybe they snapped
 @UniversalyBlack
 Replying to @socialistdogmom @ItsKenniYall
 When I was in 6th grade shopping with my
 MOTHER a white women came up to me and
 asked if I worked there
barbaradeservesbetter:

redpaladin-lance:

blackqueerblog:what the hell

I’m six years older than my step sister but people have been assuming for YEARS that she’s older than me because she’s taller than me. This is going to backfire so badly.

it’s not going to backfire. they want it to turn out badly, they know what they’re doing here. it’s calculated.

barbaradeservesbetter: redpaladin-lance: blackqueerblog:what the hell I’m six years older than my step sister but people have been ass...

Innocence: writing-prompt-s Your church-going, God-worshipping sister adopted a small child and you re excited to see them. But when you do, the child is a menace. They're throwing things everywhere, setting furniture on fire with seemingly nothing, chanting in Latin to summon demons, but the weirdest thing is that your sister doesn't seem to mind mababees "You literally adopted the antichrist, Anne. What the fuck." "Yeah, I knew when I saw him at the orphanage. I figured if the kid had some decent fucking parenting that we could avoid the whole 'Revelations' shite. Nasty business, that." George, who's name has been kindly changed from Damien, approaches his new mother with a huge spider in his hands. It promptly bursts into flames. "Good job, love. Now go find the rest." George's face makes no expression, but his eyes shine when he recieves a pat on the head for his efforts. talieclandestine As the months go by, George seems to settle down. He adjusts to school, friends, and the positive reinforcement Anne gives him. She encourages the good he does, even though the powers he uses aren't "good". When she gets calls from the school, it's about a rambunctious boy that won't sit still. Not a destroyer of the world and innocence. It's at Christmas dinner, that you let slip your amazement to your mother. How good Anne is for him and how he's improved a lot. Still summoning hellhounds for games of fetch, though "Oh, he'll forget how to do that when he falls in love the first time," Your mother laughs, smiling wide. "How do you know that," you ask bewildered "Because, you did The Story of the Antichrist
Innocence: writing-prompt-s
 Your church-going, God-worshipping sister adopted a small
 child and you re excited to see them. But when you do, the
 child is a menace. They're throwing things everywhere,
 setting furniture on fire with seemingly nothing, chanting in
 Latin to summon demons, but the weirdest thing is that
 your sister doesn't seem to mind
 mababees
 "You literally adopted the antichrist, Anne. What the fuck."
 "Yeah, I knew when I saw him at the orphanage. I figured if
 the kid had some decent fucking parenting that we could
 avoid the whole 'Revelations' shite. Nasty business, that."
 George, who's name has been kindly changed from
 Damien, approaches his new mother with a huge spider in
 his hands. It promptly bursts into flames.
 "Good job, love. Now go find the rest." George's face makes
 no expression, but his eyes shine when he recieves a pat
 on the head for his efforts.
 talieclandestine
 As the months go by, George seems to settle down. He
 adjusts to school, friends, and the positive reinforcement
 Anne gives him. She encourages the good he does, even
 though the powers he uses aren't "good". When she gets
 calls from the school, it's about a rambunctious boy that
 won't sit still. Not a destroyer of the world and innocence.
 It's at Christmas dinner, that you let slip your amazement
 to your mother. How good Anne is for him and how he's
 improved a lot. Still summoning hellhounds for games of
 fetch, though
 "Oh, he'll forget how to do that when he falls in love the
 first time," Your mother laughs, smiling wide.
 "How do you know that," you ask bewildered
 "Because, you did
The Story of the Antichrist

The Story of the Antichrist

Innocence: THE LAST DAYS OF POMPEII distrust: whatever the wishes of the mind, | love to train, to ripen their minds-to unfold the animal frame was well fitted to executethe sweet blossom of their hidden passion:s, them; the wiry muscles of the throat, the in order to prepare the fruit to my taste. I hraad chest, the nervous hands and lea loathe your ready-made and ripened courte aunt arms, which were bared above the sans; it is in the soft and unconscious prog napable alike of ress of innocence to desire that I find the sive endurance. true charm of love: it is thus that I defy ian to this fas- satiety; and by contemplating the freshness you ha e improved the of others, I sustain the freshness of my own tue much attending to my sensations. From the young hearts of my suggestion; and your verses are excellent. ictis I draw the ingredients of the caldron Always prophesy good fortupe, unless there in which I re-yout y. But enough of s an absolute impossibility oits fulilment." this: to the subject before us. You know, tin, that in Neapolis some time since I en ntered Ione and Apæcides, brother and er, the children of Athenians who had andare the to be at rest- at Neapolis. The death of their for rest prays the mariner in the Ægean sea,rents, who knew and esteemed me, consti or at least so says Horace;-can the mariner tuted me their g. I was not unmind be more an rest in the sea than when e is at fal of the trust. The youth, docile and mild, el lily to the impression I sought to on him. Next to woman, I love the lections of my ancestral land; I love to propagate on distant shores her colonies perchance yet people), her dark and mystic creeds. It may be that " Assuredly," replied the priest, leading it pleases me to delude mankind, while I thus he way to one of the small chambers which serve the deities. To Apæcides I taught the urrounded th open gate. Here they seated solemn faith of Isis. I unfolded to him rea the cinating flan voice of the stat iphave we ot s beautiful, he botton of it?" to other mattes you can admit meio one of your less sacred apartments?" which h hsomething of those sublime allegories which are couched beneath her worship. I excited winein a soul peculiarly alive to religious fer which while the companions partook, a r- 1 that enthusiasm which imagination begets on tain, drawn across the entrance opening to faith. I have placed him amongst you: he the court, concealed them rom e, b is one of you" admonished them by the thinness of the par-"He is so," said Calenus: "but in thus sition to speak low, or to speak no secrets: stimulating his faith, you have robbed him of wisdom. He is horror-struck that he is , in a voice no longer duped; our sage delusions, our ues and secret staircases, dis was its sound, at it has ever been may and revolt him; he pines; he wastes my maxim to attach yself to the young. away; he mutters to himself; he refuses to From their flexile and unformed minds I can share our ceremonies. He has been known coye out my fittest tools. I weaveI warp to frequent the company of men suspected mould them at my will.e Q the men I of adherence to that new and atheistical creed the which denies all our gods, and terms our oracles the inspirations of that malevolent ·n | spirit of which eastern tradition speaks. Our oracles-alas ! we know well whose inspira- ernative. Arbaces, air, so soft and in speaking stat favorite dstorted his ungainly features " Yes, I do not disguise it; woman is the tions they are." main object, the great appetite, of my soul.This is what I feared," said Arbace As you feed the victim for the slaughter, musingly, "from various reproaches he made love to rear the votaries of my pleasure. I me when I last saw him. Of late he hath
Innocence: THE LAST DAYS OF POMPEII
 distrust: whatever the wishes of the mind, | love to train, to ripen their minds-to unfold
 the animal frame was well fitted to executethe sweet blossom of their hidden passion:s,
 them; the wiry muscles of the throat, the in order to prepare the fruit to my taste. I
 hraad chest, the nervous hands and lea loathe your ready-made and ripened courte
 aunt arms, which were bared above the sans; it is in the soft and unconscious prog
 napable alike of ress of innocence to desire that I find the
 sive endurance. true charm of love: it is thus that I defy
 ian to this fas- satiety; and by contemplating the freshness
 you ha e improved the of others, I sustain the freshness of my own
 tue much attending to my sensations. From the young hearts of my
 suggestion; and your verses are excellent. ictis I draw the ingredients of the caldron
 Always prophesy good fortupe, unless there in which I re-yout y. But enough of
 s an absolute impossibility oits fulilment." this: to the subject before us. You know,
 tin, that in Neapolis some time since I en
 ntered Ione and Apæcides, brother and
 er, the children of Athenians who had
 andare the to be at rest- at Neapolis. The death of their
 for rest prays the mariner in the Ægean sea,rents, who knew and esteemed me, consti
 or at least so says Horace;-can the mariner tuted me their g. I was not unmind
 be more an rest in the sea than when e is at fal of the trust. The youth, docile and mild,
 el lily to the impression I sought to
 on him. Next to woman, I love the
 lections of my ancestral land; I love
 to propagate on distant shores
 her colonies perchance yet people),
 her dark and mystic creeds. It may be that
 " Assuredly," replied the priest, leading it pleases me to delude mankind, while I thus
 he way to one of the small chambers which serve the deities. To Apæcides I taught the
 urrounded th open gate. Here they seated solemn faith of Isis. I unfolded to him
 rea
 the
 cinating flan
 voice of the stat
 iphave we ot
 s beautiful,
 he botton of it?"
 to other mattes you can admit meio
 one of your less sacred apartments?"
 which h
 hsomething of those sublime allegories which
 are couched beneath her worship. I excited
 winein a soul peculiarly alive to religious fer
 which while the companions partook, a
 r- 1 that enthusiasm which imagination begets on
 tain, drawn across the entrance opening to faith. I have placed him amongst you: he
 the court, concealed them rom e, b
 is one of you"
 admonished them by the thinness of the par-"He is so," said Calenus: "but in thus
 sition to speak low, or to speak no secrets: stimulating his faith, you have robbed him
 of wisdom. He is horror-struck that he is
 , in a voice no longer duped; our sage delusions, our
 ues and secret staircases, dis
 was its sound, at it has ever been may and revolt him; he pines; he wastes
 my maxim to attach yself to the young. away; he mutters to himself; he refuses to
 From their flexile and unformed minds I can share our ceremonies. He has been known
 coye out my fittest tools. I weaveI warp to frequent the company of men suspected
 mould them at my will.e Q the men I of adherence to that new and atheistical creed
 the which denies all our gods, and terms our
 oracles the inspirations of that malevolent
 ·n | spirit of which eastern tradition speaks. Our
 oracles-alas ! we know well whose inspira-
 ernative.
 Arbaces,
 air, so soft and in speaking stat
 favorite
 dstorted his ungainly features
 " Yes, I do not disguise it; woman is the tions they are."
 main object, the great appetite, of my soul.This is what I feared," said Arbace
 As you feed the victim for the slaughter, musingly, "from various reproaches he made
 love to rear the votaries of my pleasure. I me when I last saw him. Of late he hath
Innocence: sope.bighit hobihobihoseok: MY INNOCENCE IS GONE. JUNG HOSEOK TOOK IT. cr: sope.bighit
Innocence: sope.bighit
hobihobihoseok:
MY INNOCENCE IS GONE. JUNG HOSEOK TOOK IT.
cr: sope.bighit

hobihobihoseok: MY INNOCENCE IS GONE. JUNG HOSEOK TOOK IT. cr: sope.bighit

Innocence: The Firearm Project FOLLOW I He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He was wrong. Follow us for more... See More 7.6K 1.8K Comments 141K Views Like Comment Share The Firearm Project 1 hr S FOLLOW: He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He was wrong. Follow us for more... See More O 中 7.6K 1.8K Comments 141K Views Like Comment Share 8ギ{ 49E all 77% a 2:51 PM Comments Let me ask you a question? Why did she feel the need draw her weapon? Was her life threatened? Did she intend to kill him? With the crowd of people could an innocent persorn have been hurt? Right now she's looking at aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, discharging a fire arm in a public place minimum. I hope this lady hast a lot of cash in her bag, she going to need it in the civil trial. Did what she do make sense? That is not the question. How much of what she did was legal? That's the question. And how much $ does she have in order to prove her innocence. I'm no lawyer but I do know a case Like this could tak a 5-10 days in court. And a half decent attorney gets $7,500 /day in court. If found guilty she could do 3-5 years minimum per felony offense. Being a hero doesn't come without cost. 29m 10 New Comments Write a rel.. GIF <p><a href="http://this-is-cthulhu-privilege.tumblr.com/post/173838501512/liberals-believe-that-women-who-defend-themselves" class="tumblr_blog">this-is-cthulhu-privilege</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Liberals believe that women who defend themselves are criminals.</p></blockquote> <p>“Why did she feel the need to draw her weapon?“ bitch did you not see he had a fucking gun pointed at her? How can anybody be this fucking asinine?</p>
Innocence: The Firearm Project
 FOLLOW I
 He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He
 was wrong. Follow us for more... See More
 7.6K
 1.8K Comments 141K Views
 Like Comment Share

 The Firearm Project
 1 hr S
 FOLLOW:
 He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He
 was wrong. Follow us for more... See More
 O 中
 7.6K
 1.8K Comments 141K Views
 Like Comment Share

 8ギ{ 49E all 77% a 2:51 PM
 Comments
 Let me ask you a question? Why did
 she feel the need draw her weapon?
 Was her life threatened? Did she
 intend to kill him? With the crowd of
 people could an innocent persorn
 have been hurt? Right now she's
 looking at aggravated assault with a
 deadly weapon, discharging a fire
 arm in a public place minimum. I
 hope this lady hast a lot of cash in
 her bag, she going to need it in the
 civil trial. Did what she do make
 sense? That is not the question.
 How much of what she did was
 legal? That's the question. And how
 much $ does she have in order to
 prove her innocence. I'm no lawyer
 but I do know a case Like this could
 tak a 5-10 days in court. And a half
 decent attorney gets $7,500 /day in
 court.
 If found guilty she could do 3-5 years
 minimum per felony offense. Being a
 hero doesn't come without cost.
 29m
 10 New Comments
 Write a rel..
 GIF
<p><a href="http://this-is-cthulhu-privilege.tumblr.com/post/173838501512/liberals-believe-that-women-who-defend-themselves" class="tumblr_blog">this-is-cthulhu-privilege</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>Liberals believe that women who defend themselves are criminals.</p></blockquote>

<p>“Why did she feel the need to draw her weapon?“ bitch did you not see he had a fucking gun pointed at her? How can anybody be this fucking asinine?</p>

<p><a href="http://this-is-cthulhu-privilege.tumblr.com/post/173838501512/liberals-believe-that-women-who-defend-themselves" class="tumbl...

Innocence: 7 Ways Police Will Break the Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to Get What they Want Cops routinely break the law. Here's how. By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015 peteschult: libertarirynn: gvldngrl: wolfoverdose: rikodeine: seemeflow: Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood. 1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself. 2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt. 3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.) 4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything. 5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions. 6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released. 7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches. U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges). Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so. Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore. http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life. Important Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation. Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever. Get rid of pigs!
Innocence: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
peteschult:

libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.


Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever.
Get rid of pigs!

peteschult: libertarirynn: gvldngrl: wolfoverdose: rikodeine: seemeflow: Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may leg...

Innocence: <p><a href="http://cosmo-gonika.tumblr.com/post/173061806400/reyloship82-there-is-no-horizon-for-us" class="tumblr_blog" target="_blank">cosmo-gonika</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://reyloship82.tumblr.com/post/173061609805/there-is-no-horizon-for-us-cosmo-gonika-the" class="tumblr_blog" target="_blank">reyloship82</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>“There is no horizon for us”</p> <p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/m37dF2YtdhJSLXZ16KC4Kaw" target="_blank">@cosmo-gonika</a></p> <p>The perfect song , but I’m sorry it is in Russian</p> <p>Мумий Тролль: “Карты”<br/></p> <p>Всех морей не пройти.<br/>Прям в начале пути растерялись, подзадержались.<br/>Карты выучили, знали все языки…<br/>Да, вот, остались - подумали лучше пройдут если тучи.<br/><br/>Как будто не знали, что<br/>В этом тумане надо жить не по Солнцу.<br/>Ночью нам в Океане горизонт тут не светит,<br/>Там идут не по звёздам - там сердцем идут.<br/><br/>Всех полей не вспахать.<br/>Ста смертям не бывать.<br/>Зря что-ли метнулись,<br/>Зато улыбнулись!<br/><br/>Как будто не знали, что<br/>В этом тумане надо жить не по Солнцу.<br/>Ночью нам в Океане горизонт тут не светит,<br/>Там идут не по звёздам - там сердцем идут.<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>This is amazing!!  ❤️ We were talking with <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mJwOLghBICeraYRRXfzy1qA" target="_blank">@reyloship82</a> about the kiss scene in <a href="https://archiveofourown.org/works/13079241/chapters/29920821" target="_blank">Songs of Innocence, Songs of Wisdom, </a>and she came up with this fantastic work, and tells me there will be another one of a kiss! <br/></p> <p>I LOVE this piece. The longing and intensity they both display is brilliantly conveyed. <br/></p> <p>Honestly, you are SO talented! Give her some love, she is amazing! <br/></p> <p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/m7Sxf3e0Pj4nI21fxdmUJ_Q" target="_blank">@pandoraspocksao3</a> Look at this beauty! <br/></p> </blockquote>
Innocence: <p><a href="http://cosmo-gonika.tumblr.com/post/173061806400/reyloship82-there-is-no-horizon-for-us" class="tumblr_blog" target="_blank">cosmo-gonika</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://reyloship82.tumblr.com/post/173061609805/there-is-no-horizon-for-us-cosmo-gonika-the" class="tumblr_blog" target="_blank">reyloship82</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“There is no horizon for us”</p>
<p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/m37dF2YtdhJSLXZ16KC4Kaw" target="_blank">@cosmo-gonika</a></p>
<p>The perfect song , but I’m sorry it is in Russian</p>
<p>Мумий Тролль: “Карты”<br/></p>
<p>Всех морей не пройти.<br/>Прям в начале пути растерялись, подзадержались.<br/>Карты выучили, знали все языки…<br/>Да, вот, остались - подумали лучше пройдут если тучи.<br/><br/>Как будто не знали, что<br/>В этом тумане надо жить не по Солнцу.<br/>Ночью нам в Океане горизонт тут не светит,<br/>Там идут не по звёздам - там сердцем идут.<br/><br/>Всех полей не вспахать.<br/>Ста смертям не бывать.<br/>Зря что-ли метнулись,<br/>Зато улыбнулись!<br/><br/>Как будто не знали, что<br/>В этом тумане надо жить не по Солнцу.<br/>Ночью нам в Океане горизонт тут не светит,<br/>Там идут не по звёздам - там сердцем идут.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is amazing!!  ❤️ We were talking with <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mJwOLghBICeraYRRXfzy1qA" target="_blank">@reyloship82</a> about the kiss scene in <a href="https://archiveofourown.org/works/13079241/chapters/29920821" target="_blank">Songs of Innocence, Songs of Wisdom, </a>and she came up with this fantastic work, and tells me there will be another one of a kiss! <br/></p>
<p>I LOVE this piece. The longing and intensity they both display is brilliantly conveyed. <br/></p>
<p>Honestly, you are SO talented! Give her some love, she is amazing! <br/></p>
<p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/m7Sxf3e0Pj4nI21fxdmUJ_Q" target="_blank">@pandoraspocksao3</a> Look at this beauty! <br/></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://cosmo-gonika.tumblr.com/post/173061806400/reyloship82-there-is-no-horizon-for-us" class="tumblr_blog" target="_blank">...

Innocence: Rebecca Wald 15 Mar at 13:24 The myth that school shooters are outcasts fighting back against bullies dates back to Columbine. At the time it was widely reported that Harris and Klebold were social rejects, and much was made of the meanness of popular kids. But the FBI concluded that Harris was a full-on psychopath, and that kids didn't like the boys because they did creepy things like walking around giving the Nazi salute. Even so, a few days before the attack Klebold took a date to the prom, crammed into a limo with a dozen friends. Still the myth persists. Walk Up, Not Out" is a campaign of cowardice, promoted by adults who want there to be a solution to school shootings that asks literally nothing of us. No tough choices, no exercise of political will, no speaking out to power - just ecturing kids on how to do better. We're good at that. It's also worth noting that only certain kids are privileged by this narrative. You've never seen moralizing Facebook posts arguing that if only the popular girls would sit down next to that Latino kid in the cafeteria, he wouldn't join MS-13. No. This argument only applies to crimes overwhelmingly committed by white boys. Their crimes are tragic betrayals of an underlying innocence that is never attributed to black boys selling drugs on the corner. lazerdoesfeminism: kids shouldn’t feel the need to befriend people just to avoid being murdered, that’s not how we solve this
Innocence: Rebecca Wald
 15 Mar at 13:24
 The myth that school shooters are outcasts
 fighting back against bullies dates back to
 Columbine. At the time it was widely reported
 that Harris and Klebold were social rejects, and
 much was made of the meanness of popular
 kids. But the FBI concluded that Harris was a
 full-on psychopath, and that kids didn't like the
 boys because they did creepy things like
 walking around giving the Nazi salute. Even so,
 a few days before the attack Klebold took a
 date to the prom, crammed into a limo with a
 dozen friends. Still the myth persists.
 Walk Up, Not Out" is a campaign of cowardice,
 promoted by adults who want there to be a
 solution to school shootings that asks literally
 nothing of us. No tough choices, no exercise of
 political will, no speaking out to power - just
 ecturing kids on how to do better. We're good
 at that.
 It's also worth noting that only certain kids are
 privileged by this narrative. You've never seen
 moralizing Facebook posts arguing that if only
 the popular girls would sit down next to that
 Latino kid in the cafeteria, he wouldn't join
 MS-13. No. This argument only applies to
 crimes overwhelmingly committed by white
 boys. Their crimes are tragic betrayals of an
 underlying innocence that is never attributed to
 black boys selling drugs on the corner.
lazerdoesfeminism:
kids shouldn’t feel the need to befriend people just to avoid being murdered, that’s not how we solve this

lazerdoesfeminism: kids shouldn’t feel the need to befriend people just to avoid being murdered, that’s not how we solve this

Innocence: 7 Ways Police Will Break the Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to Get What they Want Cops routinely break the law. Here's how. By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015 <p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://wolfoverdose.tumblr.com/post/166265395771/rikodeine-seemeflow-because-of-the-fifth" class="tumblr_blog">wolfoverdose</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rikodeine.tumblr.com/post/131562629300">rikodeine</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://seemeflow.tumblr.com/post/131556627065">seemeflow</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><b>Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.</b></p> <p><b>1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”</b><br/>Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.</p> <p><b>2) “Do you have something to hide?”</b><br/>Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.</p> <p><b>3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”</b><br/>The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”<br/>(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)</p> <p><b>4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”</b><br/>Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.</p> <p><b>5.) We have someone who will testify against you</b><br/>Police “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.</p> <p><b>6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”</b><br/>Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.</p> <p><b>7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”</b><br/>Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.</p> <p>U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).</p> <p>Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.</p> <p>Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.</p> <p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want">http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want</a><br/></p> </blockquote> <p>One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else</p> </blockquote> <p>Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.</p> </blockquote> <p>Important </p> </blockquote> <p>Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.</p>
Innocence: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
<p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://wolfoverdose.tumblr.com/post/166265395771/rikodeine-seemeflow-because-of-the-fifth" class="tumblr_blog">wolfoverdose</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rikodeine.tumblr.com/post/131562629300">rikodeine</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://seemeflow.tumblr.com/post/131556627065">seemeflow</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.</b></p>
<p><b>1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”</b><br/>Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.</p>
<p><b>2) “Do you have something to hide?”</b><br/>Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.</p>
<p><b>3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”</b><br/>The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”<br/>(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)</p>
<p><b>4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”</b><br/>Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.</p>
<p><b>5.) We have someone who will testify against you</b><br/>Police “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.</p>
<p><b>6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”</b><br/>Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.</p>
<p><b>7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”</b><br/>Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.</p>
<p>U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).</p>
<p>Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.</p>
<p>Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want">http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want</a><br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Important </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.</p>

<p><a href="http://gvldngrl.tumblr.com/post/166513263494/wolfoverdose-rikodeine-seemeflow-because" class="tumblr_blog">gvldngrl</a>:</p><...

Innocence: 28 Dec 28 Dec Replying to SarahKSilverman Cunt Replying to @SarahKSilverman I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit. Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back Fucking sux too. see what happens when u choose love. I see it in you 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to risk getting burned. It's what happens when u fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise. 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017 67 185 1,523 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I can't choose love. A man that resembles Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I can't find peace if I could find that guy who ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its hard to get help 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care specialists willing 2 help my friend He has several slipped discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in? 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017 28 17 133 Sarah Silverman Replying to Imarti25 and 3 others What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic cost? Initial and then per session if someone has no insurance? I tried to call but they're closed for he holidays 29 Dec Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And you don't deserve punishment. You deserve support. Go to one of these support groups. You might meet ur best bros there 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in contact with 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017 96 15 463 We're on it! <p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc">http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc</a></p>
Innocence: 28 Dec
 28 Dec
 Replying to SarahKSilverman
 Cunt
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so
 many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and
 everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I
 have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit.
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what
 ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u
 know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back
 Fucking sux too. see what happens when u
 choose love. I see it in you
 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED
 Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to
 risk getting burned. It's what happens when u
 fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise.
 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017
 67
 185
 1,523
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I can't choose love. A man that resembles
 Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I
 can't find peace if I could find that guy who
 ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd
 kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its
 hard to get help
 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017
 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care
 specialists willing 2 help my friend
 He has several slipped
 discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe
 pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in?
 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017
 28
 17
 133
 Sarah Silverman
 Replying to Imarti25 and 3 others
 What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic
 cost? Initial and then per session if someone
 has no insurance? I tried to call but they're
 closed for he holidays
 29 Dec
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine
 your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if
 you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And
 you don't deserve punishment. You deserve
 support. Go to one of these support groups.
 You might meet ur best bros there
 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017
 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in
 contact with
 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017
 96 15 463
 We're on it!
<p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc">http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc</a></p>

<p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc">http://ift.tt/2CQ7dyc</a></p>

Innocence: 28 Dec 28 Dec Replying to SarahKSilverman Cunt Replying to @SarahKSilverman I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit. Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back Fucking sux too. see what happens when u choose love. I see it in you 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to risk getting burned. It's what happens when u fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise. 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017 67 185 1,523 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I can't choose love. A man that resembles Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I can't find peace if I could find that guy who ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its hard to get help 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care specialists willing 2 help my friend He has several slipped discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in? 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017 28 17 133 Sarah Silverman Replying to Imarti25 and 3 others What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic cost? Initial and then per session if someone has no insurance? I tried to call but they're closed for he holidays 29 Dec Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And you don't deserve punishment. You deserve support. Go to one of these support groups. You might meet ur best bros there 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in contact with 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017 96 15 463 We're on it! <p>Saint Sarah</p>
Innocence: 28 Dec
 28 Dec
 Replying to SarahKSilverman
 Cunt
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so
 many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and
 everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I
 have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit.
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what
 ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u
 know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back
 Fucking sux too. see what happens when u
 choose love. I see it in you
 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED
 Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to
 risk getting burned. It's what happens when u
 fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise.
 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017
 67
 185
 1,523
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I can't choose love. A man that resembles
 Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I
 can't find peace if I could find that guy who
 ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd
 kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its
 hard to get help
 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017
 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care
 specialists willing 2 help my friend
 He has several slipped
 discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe
 pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in?
 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017
 28
 17
 133
 Sarah Silverman
 Replying to Imarti25 and 3 others
 What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic
 cost? Initial and then per session if someone
 has no insurance? I tried to call but they're
 closed for he holidays
 29 Dec
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine
 your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if
 you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And
 you don't deserve punishment. You deserve
 support. Go to one of these support groups.
 You might meet ur best bros there
 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017
 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in
 contact with
 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017
 96 15 463
 We're on it!
<p>Saint Sarah</p>

<p>Saint Sarah</p>

Innocence: Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec Replying to @SarahKSilverman Cunt Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec Replying to @SarahKSilverman I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit. Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back Fucking sux too. see what happens when u choose love. I see it in you 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to risk getting burned. It's what happens when u fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise. 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017 67 l 185 O 1,523 Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman l can't choose love. A man that resembles Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I can't find peace if I could find that guy who ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its hard to get help 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care specialists willing 2 help my friend @jeremy_jamrozy He has several slipped discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in? 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017 28 17 133 Sarah Silverman Replying to @Imarti25 and 3 others What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic cost? Initial and then per session if someone has no insurance? I tried to call but they're closed for he holidays 29 Dec Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And you don't deserve punishment. You deserve support. Go to one of these support groups. You might meet ur best bros there. 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017 Airrosti @Airrosti Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in contact with Jeremy. We're on it! 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017 <p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ">http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ</a></p>
Innocence: Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 Cunt
 Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so
 many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and
 everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I
 have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit.
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what
 ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u
 know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back
 Fucking sux too. see what happens when u
 choose love. I see it in you
 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED
 Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to
 risk getting burned. It's what happens when u
 fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise.
 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017
 67 l 185 O 1,523
 Jeremy jamrozy
 @jeremy_jamrozy
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 l can't choose love. A man that resembles
 Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I
 can't find peace if I could find that guy who
 ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd
 kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its
 hard to get help
 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017
 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care
 specialists willing 2 help my friend
 @jeremy_jamrozy He has several slipped
 discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe
 pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in?
 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017
 28
 17
 133
 Sarah Silverman
 Replying to @Imarti25 and 3 others
 What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic
 cost? Initial and then per session if someone
 has no insurance? I tried to call but they're
 closed for he holidays
 29 Dec
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine
 your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if
 you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And
 you don't deserve punishment. You deserve
 support. Go to one of these support groups.
 You might meet ur best bros there.
 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017
 Airrosti
 @Airrosti
 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in
 contact with Jeremy. We're on it!
 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017
<p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ">http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ</a></p>

<p>Saint Sarah via /r/wholesomememes <a href="http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ">http://ift.tt/2EgNBQJ</a></p>

Innocence: Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec Replying to @SarahKSilverman Cunt Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec Replying to @SarahKSilverman I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit. Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back Fucking sux too. see what happens when u choose love. I see it in you 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017 Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to risk getting burned. It's what happens when u fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise. 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017 67 l 185 O 1,523 Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman l can't choose love. A man that resembles Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I can't find peace if I could find that guy who ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its hard to get help 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care specialists willing 2 help my friend @jeremy_jamrozy He has several slipped discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in? 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017 28 17 133 Sarah Silverman Replying to @Imarti25 and 3 others What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic cost? Initial and then per session if someone has no insurance? I tried to call but they're closed for he holidays 29 Dec Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And you don't deserve punishment. You deserve support. Go to one of these support groups. You might meet ur best bros there. 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017 Airrosti @Airrosti Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in contact with Jeremy. We're on it! 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017 <p>Saint Sarah</p>
Innocence: Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 Cunt
 Jeremy jamrozy @jeremy_jamrozy 28 Dec
 Replying to @SarahKSilverman
 I will go. But I trust no one I've been burned so
 many times. I'd give the shirt off my back and
 everytime I get burned. I'm super antisocial. I
 have no friends. I'm sorry I gave u shit.
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 I believe in you. I read ur timeline & I see what
 ur doing & your rage is thinly veiled pain. But u
 know that. I know this feeling. Ps My back
 Fucking sux too. see what happens when u
 choose love. I see it in you
 7:36 PM Dec 28, 2017
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Im so psyched you'll go. KEEP ME POSTED
 Don't give up on yourself. Be brave enough to
 risk getting burned. It's what happens when u
 fight for yourself. But it's worth it. I promise.
 8:01 PM Dec 28, 2017
 67 l 185 O 1,523
 Jeremy jamrozy
 @jeremy_jamrozy
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 l can't choose love. A man that resembles
 Kevin spacey took that away when I was 8. I
 can't find peace if I could find that guy who
 ripped my body who stripped my innocence l'd
 kill him. He fucked me up and I'm poor so its
 hard to get help
 7:41 PM-Dec 28, 2017
 Yo SAN ANTONIO! Any kickass back/neck care
 specialists willing 2 help my friend
 @jeremy_jamrozy He has several slipped
 discs, no insurance, & can't work bc of severe
 pain. Let's get him back on his feet!! Who's in?
 12:01 AM Dec 29, 2017
 28
 17
 133
 Sarah Silverman
 Replying to @Imarti25 and 3 others
 What's the pricing? Can you give me the basic
 cost? Initial and then per session if someone
 has no insurance? I tried to call but they're
 closed for he holidays
 29 Dec
 Sarah Silverman
 @SarahKSilverman
 Good. I want to kill him too so I can't imagine
 your rage. All I know is this rage- and even if
 you could kill him- it's punishing yourself. And
 you don't deserve punishment. You deserve
 support. Go to one of these support groups.
 You might meet ur best bros there.
 7:53 PM - Dec 28, 2017
 Airrosti
 @Airrosti
 Hey Sarah, just to let you know we've been in
 contact with Jeremy. We're on it!
 11:54 AM Dec 30, 2017
<p>Saint Sarah</p>

<p>Saint Sarah</p>

Innocence: microcosmicqueen: rosymamacita: i-want-cheese: awkwardblacknerd: I still think Moana deserved an Oscar for this part To me, the moral of Moana is that only women can help other women heal from male violence.  The movie starts with the idea that the male god who wronged Te Fiti must be the one to heal her. This seems to make a certain sort of intuitive sense in that I think we all believe that if you do something wrong you should try to make it right. But how does he try to right it? Through more violence. Of course that failed.  It was only when another woman, Moana, saw past the “demon of earth and fire” that the traumatized Te Fiti had become (what a good metaphor for trauma, right?) and met her with love instead of violence that she was able to heal. Note that they do the forehead press before Moana restores the heart, while Te Fiti is still Te Kā. Moana doesn’t wait for her beautiful island goddess to appear in all her green splendor before greeting and treating her as someone deserving of love. Moana is only able to restore the heart because Te Kā reveals her vulnerability and allows Moana to touch her there. Maui and his male violence could only ever have resulted in more ruin. Also important that it was the GIRL who returned the heart to Te Fiti. She wasn’t a woman. She was a GIRL. The innocence and strength of GIRLS before the world turns them hard and steals their hearts is a power in its own right. If this is a metaphor for abuse and healing, it’s the woman who gets back in touch with her own youthful power, her potential, her hope, who finds peace and recovery. If we imagine this as Te Ka’s story, it is remembering her youthful strength that returns her heart and lets her become herself again. I have cried every time I see this scene of the movie (I have a 5 year old sister, I’ve seen Moana dozens of times lol) and I was never really able to articulate why it just gets to me so much and this is exactly why.
Innocence: microcosmicqueen:
rosymamacita:

i-want-cheese:

awkwardblacknerd:


I still think Moana deserved an Oscar for this part
To me, the moral of Moana is that only women can help other women heal from male violence. 
The movie starts with the idea that the male god who wronged Te Fiti must be the one to heal her. This seems to make a certain sort of intuitive sense in that I think we all believe that if you do something wrong you should try to make it right. But how does he try to right it? Through more violence. Of course that failed. 
It was only when another woman, Moana, saw past the “demon of earth and fire” that the traumatized Te Fiti had become (what a good metaphor for trauma, right?) and met her with love instead of violence that she was able to heal. Note that they do the forehead press before Moana restores the heart, while Te Fiti is still Te Kā. Moana doesn’t wait for her beautiful island goddess to appear in all her green splendor before greeting and treating her as someone deserving of love.
Moana is only able to restore the heart because Te Kā reveals her vulnerability and allows Moana to touch her there. Maui and his male violence could only ever have resulted in more ruin.

Also important that it was the GIRL who returned the heart to Te Fiti. She wasn’t a woman. She was a GIRL. The innocence and strength of GIRLS before the world turns them hard and steals their hearts is a power in its own right.
If this is a metaphor for abuse and healing, it’s the woman who gets back in touch with her own youthful power, her potential, her hope, who finds peace and recovery. If we imagine this as Te Ka’s story, it is remembering her youthful strength that returns her heart and lets her become herself again.


I have cried every time I see this scene of the movie (I have a 5 year old sister, I’ve seen Moana dozens of times lol) and I was never really able to articulate why it just gets to me so much and this is exactly why.

microcosmicqueen: rosymamacita: i-want-cheese: awkwardblacknerd: I still think Moana deserved an Oscar for this part To me, the moral...