Non
Non

Non

A Href
A Href

A Href

I Lived
I Lived

I Lived

With
With

With

Kind Of
Kind Of

Kind Of

Kind
Kind

Kind

From
From

From

The
The

The

No New
No New

No New

Where
Where

Where

🔥 | Latest

Bad, Bored, and Love: Meet Chadexplainshis troubled past in his TinderT" profile. Chad, Heisveryhonest abouthis history of Child Rape. Chad, 29 Sup i Chad u dont ike me 2 badhings u onocim a convicted child apistimoleshoc its y pastmade some stakes but workin ech day to fax em Jookin or fun, longer su Will he getmatches? Will he find love? be around ina month cause 1o go back to jad for sapid thing between me y ex, she s oveecting about o few sips gave her a year ago hmhat bad srsy You matched with- uh hey my protle and get read it that for neal or jake or what7 ts real t was only t kod, he was 8 and in my mind it felt consentual but its over now and im tryin to move on Wow not ry sure what bo say i guess its cool how youne bein honbest about it though are u doing right Ugh just bored bored and on tinder loolkin for fun and stuft yourser? you from You matched with f you didnt read my prole aready check t out explains why i wear an anide monitor which youll probly see when my Ewww wtr that serious,? Im speechless. How old was the That's super fucked up man. Honestly would just rather stop talking about it Is that ok? I didn't say I was done talking to you about other sturf Type a message You matched with t "。 Hey there then brush it can go ahead and So your plan here is to boss me around and expct me to do everything you say because why? forget You give up easy don't you Calm down slly IDID READ YOUR PROFILE, can we move on now? What22 forges a Type a message Your photos just made my day Ok to you too jeez dont lke compliments do we?ee ol ur good make read my profle Yes I read it and yes im ok with it long as you are a different person Wie all make mistakes sweet not everyone thinks lke thet, some people think ts serrible to molest kods and that i should be kled and the itte boy was 6 soit waset a baby or anything what areyou up to tho? Wea soundsike you've beenthrough á lotand learned your lessen. Right now hncookingdi nec, and you? Hahal you're kind of blunt anen't youe Tm about minutes away actually Type a message Meet Chad, the Child Rapist.
Bad, Bored, and Love: Meet
 Chadexplainshis
 troubled past in his
 TinderT" profile.
 Chad,
 Heisveryhonest
 abouthis history of
 Child Rape.
 Chad, 29
 Sup i
 Chad u dont ike me 2 badhings u
 onocim a convicted child apistimoleshoc its
 y pastmade some stakes but workin ech
 day to fax em Jookin or fun, longer su
 Will he getmatches?
 Will he find love?
 be around ina
 month cause
 1o go back to jad for sapid thing between me
 y ex, she s oveecting about o few sips
 gave her a year ago hmhat bad srsy
 You matched with-
 uh hey
 my protle and get
 read it that for neal or jake or what7
 ts real t was only t kod, he was 8 and in my mind it felt consentual but its over now and im tryin to move on
 Wow not ry sure what bo say i guess its cool how youne bein honbest about it though
 are u doing right
 Ugh just bored bored and on tinder loolkin for fun and stuft yourser?
 you from
 You matched with
 f you didnt read my prole aready check t out explains why i wear an anide monitor which youll probly see when my
 Ewww wtr that serious,?
 Im speechless. How old was the
 That's super fucked up man. Honestly would just rather stop talking about it
 Is that ok? I didn't say I was done talking to you about other sturf
 Type a message
 You matched with t
 "。
 Hey there
 then brush it
 can go ahead and
 So your plan here is to boss me around and expct me to do everything you say because why?
 forget
 You give up easy don't you
 Calm down slly IDID READ YOUR PROFILE, can we move on now?
 What22
 forges a
 Type a message
 Your photos just made my day
 Ok to you too jeez dont lke compliments do we?ee
 ol ur good make
 read my profle
 Yes I read it and yes im ok with it long as you are a different person Wie all make mistakes
 sweet not everyone thinks lke thet, some people think ts serrible to molest kods and that i should be kled and the itte boy
 was 6 soit waset a baby or anything what areyou up to tho?
 Wea
 soundsike you've beenthrough á
 lotand learned your lessen. Right now hncookingdi nec, and you?
 Hahal you're kind of blunt anen't youe
 Tm about minutes away actually
 Type a message
Meet Chad, the Child Rapist.

Meet Chad, the Child Rapist.

Ass, Bitch, and Boner: This is a motherfucking website. Seriously, what the fuck else do you want? You probably build websites and think your sh is special. You think your 13 megabyte parallax-ative home page is going to get you some fucking Awwward banner you can glue to the top corner of your site. You think your 40-pound jQuery file and 83 polyfills give IE7 a boner because it finally has box-shadow. Wrong, mothfucker Let me describe your perfect-ass website . Shit's lightweight and loads fast Fits on all your shitty screens . Looks the same in ll your shitty browsers .The motherfucker's accessible to every asshole that visits your site . Shit's legible and gets your fucking point across (if you had one instead of just 5mb pics of hipsters drinking coffee) Well guess what, motherfucker: You. Are. Over-designing. Look at this shit. It's a motherfucking website. Why the fuck do you need to animate a fucking trendy-ass banner flag when I hover over that useless piece of shit? You spent hours on it and added S0 kilobytes to your fucking site, and some motherfucker jabbing at it on their iPad with fat sausage fingers will never see that shit. Not to mention blind people will never see that shit, but they don't see any of your You never knew it, but ths is your perfect website. Here's why It's fucking lightweight This entire page weighs less than the gradient-meshed facebook logo on your fucking Wordpress site. Did you seriously load 100kb of jQuery UI just so you could animate the fucking background color of a div? You loaded all 7 fontfaces of a shitty webfont just so you could say "Hi." at 100px height at the beginning of your site? You piece of shit Phone: (333) 425- 5253 Fax: (333) 888 3424 Email: john(at)university(dot)edu It's responsive You dumbass. You thought you needed media queries to be responsive, but no. Responsive means that it responds to whatever motherfucking screensize it's viewed on This site doesn't care if youre on an iMac or a motherftucking Tamagotchi. . Office: Generic Hall. 415 It fucking works ul Look at tis sh You can read i so you and your bitch-ass brows M. N. Shamalayan Publications M. N. Shamalayan. "Combining Neural Networks With Natural Language tag icoutent on the fucking ser Fall 1995 Processing to Optiize te Iter Problem (ICSE-1998) tiplication Problem ICSE-2000) Machine to Solve the Ice-Cream Optiization Probl ICSE-2002) CS101: How to literally use for-loops M. N. Shamalayan Using Unguided Prim Trees to Solve the Matrix Mul M. N. Shamalayan Using Large Dataset Combined with Support Vector . CSSS9: You will seriously get rekt by this course dont take it Last edited: Sep. 29, 2016 Comp sci professor website starter pack
Ass, Bitch, and Boner: This is a motherfucking website.
 Seriously, what the fuck else do you want?
 You probably build websites and think your sh is special. You think your 13 megabyte parallax-ative home page is going to get you some
 fucking Awwward banner you can glue to the top corner of your site. You think your 40-pound jQuery file and 83 polyfills give IE7 a boner
 because it finally has box-shadow. Wrong, mothfucker Let me describe your perfect-ass website
 . Shit's lightweight and loads fast
 Fits on all your shitty screens
 . Looks the same in ll your shitty browsers
 .The motherfucker's accessible to every asshole that visits your site
 . Shit's legible and gets your fucking point across (if you had one instead of just 5mb pics of hipsters drinking coffee)
 Well guess what, motherfucker:
 You. Are. Over-designing. Look at this shit. It's a motherfucking website. Why the fuck do you need to animate a fucking trendy-ass banner flag
 when I hover over that useless piece of shit? You spent hours on it and added S0 kilobytes to your fucking site, and some motherfucker jabbing at
 it on their iPad with fat sausage fingers will never see that shit. Not to mention blind people will never see that shit, but they don't see any of your
 You never knew it, but ths is your perfect website. Here's why
 It's fucking lightweight
 This entire page weighs less than the gradient-meshed facebook logo on your fucking Wordpress site. Did you seriously load 100kb of jQuery UI
 just so you could animate the fucking background color of a div? You loaded all 7 fontfaces of a shitty webfont just so you could say "Hi." at
 100px height at the beginning of your site? You piece of shit
 Phone: (333) 425- 5253
 Fax: (333) 888 3424
 Email: john(at)university(dot)edu
 It's responsive
 You dumbass. You thought you needed media queries to be responsive, but no. Responsive means that it responds to whatever motherfucking
 screensize it's viewed on This site doesn't care if youre on an iMac or a motherftucking Tamagotchi.
 . Office: Generic Hall. 415
 It fucking works
 ul
 Look at tis sh You can read i
 so you and your bitch-ass brows
 M. N. Shamalayan
 Publications
 M. N. Shamalayan. "Combining Neural Networks With Natural Language
 tag
 icoutent on the fucking ser Fall 1995
 Processing to Optiize te Iter Problem (ICSE-1998)
 tiplication Problem ICSE-2000)
 Machine to Solve the Ice-Cream Optiization Probl ICSE-2002)
 CS101: How to literally use for-loops
 M. N. Shamalayan Using Unguided Prim Trees to Solve the Matrix Mul
 M. N. Shamalayan Using Large Dataset Combined with Support Vector
 . CSSS9: You will seriously get rekt by this course dont take it
 Last edited: Sep. 29, 2016
Comp sci professor website starter pack

Comp sci professor website starter pack

Drunk, Fml, and Friday: Emplovee Saves Child From Kidnapper, Instead Of Promotion Gets This Letter Saying He's Fired This is Dillon Reagan. He recently stopped a child from getting kidnapped while he was at work OREGON EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT PO Box 14135 Satem, Oregon 97309 5068 (503) 292-2057, (541) 388-6207 or (877) 345 3484 (tol tree) Fax to (866) 345 1878 Administrative Decision OILLON T REAGAN Date Issued June 29,2017 Appeal Deadline Date: uly 19,2017 Cust ID: OUTCOME/RESULTADO. You are ALLOWED benefits on this claim, if otherwise eligible. Se le OTORGAN los beneficios en este reclamo, si de otra manera es elegible. FINDINGS You were employed by THE HOME DEPOT until June 19, 2017 when you were fired because you assisted the police in preventing a kidnapping. This was not a willful or wantonly negligent violation of the standards of behavior an employer has the right to expect of an employee LEGAL CONCLUSION/CONCLUSION JURÍDICA: You were fired but not for misconduct connected with work Usted no fue despedido por mala conducta relacionada con el trabajo. Dillon Reagan Jun 9 at 11:21pm HoPot Update: The Friday before Mother's Day, I was involved in a kidnapping attempt at my place of work. A woman had been assaulted and her child had been abducted by a drunk, violent man who was making a quick exit with the child in his arms. My co-worker and I called the police and followed their directions to follow at a distance to make sure they could find them when the squad care arrived on scene. Because of the actions of my co-worker and myself, that child was rescued from his abductor and the man was arrested on the spot. Today, Home Depot terminated my employment. I was fired for stopping a kidnapper from successfully abducting a child. FML thetrippytrip: If he manages to get that story viral, he’ll get a job 5 times better than his last one #youknowwhatImean
Drunk, Fml, and Friday: Emplovee Saves Child From Kidnapper,
 Instead Of Promotion Gets This Letter
 Saying He's Fired

 This is Dillon Reagan. He recently
 stopped a child from getting
 kidnapped while he was at work

 OREGON EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
 PO Box 14135 Satem, Oregon 97309 5068
 (503) 292-2057, (541) 388-6207 or (877) 345 3484 (tol tree)
 Fax to (866) 345 1878
 Administrative Decision
 OILLON T REAGAN
 Date Issued
 June 29,2017
 Appeal Deadline Date:
 uly 19,2017
 Cust ID:
 OUTCOME/RESULTADO.
 You are ALLOWED benefits on this claim, if otherwise eligible.
 Se le OTORGAN los beneficios en este reclamo, si de otra manera es elegible.
 FINDINGS
 You were employed by THE HOME DEPOT until June 19, 2017 when you were fired because you assisted
 the police in preventing a kidnapping. This was not a willful or wantonly negligent violation of the
 standards of behavior an employer has the right to expect of an employee
 LEGAL CONCLUSION/CONCLUSION JURÍDICA:
 You were fired but not for misconduct connected with work
 Usted no fue despedido por mala conducta relacionada con el trabajo.

 Dillon Reagan
 Jun 9 at 11:21pm
 HoPot Update:
 The Friday before Mother's Day, I was involved in a
 kidnapping attempt at my place of work.
 A woman had been assaulted and her child had been
 abducted by a drunk, violent man who was making a
 quick exit with the child in his arms.
 My co-worker and I called the police and followed their
 directions to follow at a distance to make sure they
 could find them when the squad care arrived on scene.
 Because of the actions of my co-worker and myself,
 that child was rescued from his abductor and the man
 was arrested on the spot.
 Today, Home Depot terminated my employment.
 I was fired for stopping a kidnapper from successfully
 abducting a child.
 FML
thetrippytrip:

If he manages to get that story viral, he’ll get a job 5 times better than his last one #youknowwhatImean

thetrippytrip: If he manages to get that story viral, he’ll get a job 5 times better than his last one #youknowwhatImean

Hit 'Em, Got, and Fax: When somebody got me fucked up n im bout to hit em wit fax
Hit 'Em, Got, and Fax: When somebody got me fucked up n im bout to hit em wit fax

When somebody got me fucked up n im bout to hit em wit fax

America, Cars, and Computers: Lee Fang @lhfang When robotics/driverless cars replace 1/3 jobs in America, and the political establishment does nothing, 2016 anger will look minuscule. 11/5/16, 10:03 PM 287 RETWEETS 497 LIKES c-bassmeow: cracked-pearl-78: c-bassmeow: Shit Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no closer to being true. While you are historically correct, many economists, tech experts (people who work with tech who are far from luddites), and even CEO’s of tech companies believe that with the increasing automation  of jobs, many jobs will go to machines and there will be a great, massive reduction in jobs. Economists both from the left and right think this is to be true since it’s already happening just not to a large extent YET. Even the Bureau of labor statistics projects massive job loss due to human jobs becoming obsolete because technological changes that make it more efficient to replace humans with machines/computers since it will be cheaper, less error, and more efficient to replace humans since machines do not need to rest, do not have families, can be worked to their extreme, and can be programmed to do something correctly all the time. Moreover with the prospect of artificial intelligence which is being invested heavily, the change might manifest more rapidly.  One remedy for this from some economists from both the left and right is to enact a universal basic income. But while I appreciate your skepticism, which is very healthy because i too have a disdain for predictions with no basis in reality or that sound alarmist- to my knowledge there seems to be a slow, growing consensus from many fields that technological progress will replace many many human jobs the extent to which they will replace them is obviously debatable but the fact that they will be replaced to some degree that affects us seems to not be. I’m sorry I can’t cite sources I’m on my phone at the moment. Also,  throughout history technological progress has always replaced jobs.  There are less shoemakers now, farmers, cashiers, and countless other positions due to technological progress. Historically though,  we have been able to replace these jobs with new ones created through social change, technological change, and other factors but I and many think that we have hit a special time in history where technology will simply take over many more jobs than we can replace.  Technological progress is so advanced now that many products that we had to buy separately are now consolidated into one (an iphone is a fax machine, a phone, a computer, a camera, a tv, etc) and at times less people are needed in the aggregate to make these products.   Lastly, and this is just semantics,  I do believe that many techno-optimists believe technological progress automatically means “good” because we associate the word technology with human advancement and because “progress” is  a word that assumes benevolence, but this is not the case. Technological and scientific progress are not inherently good.  I am no luddite and I am a lover of science BUT science and technological advancement are sometimes removed and unaware of the unintended consequences created by their advancement since we rarely know all the social, economic, political, ramifications brought by said technology/scientific discoveries at the time of their creation and birth. So to assume everything will be a positive step forward is a naive assumption not supported by data but simply a subjective feeling of comfort and happiness because tech progress is being made. So i am no luddite, but I do think there is cause this time to be healthily afraid of what is to come.  A capitalist system has historically relied on humans but when those who own the means of production switch to a more inexpensive, rational, hard working, and anti-error prone substitute …. then what happens? It has never been done before so to assume you can use history as a guide (which is usually a very intelligent move) is somewhat misguided for what is to come has never happened before. 
America, Cars, and Computers: Lee Fang
 @lhfang
 When robotics/driverless cars replace 1/3
 jobs in America, and the political
 establishment does nothing, 2016 anger
 will look minuscule.
 11/5/16, 10:03 PM
 287 RETWEETS 497 LIKES
c-bassmeow:
cracked-pearl-78:

c-bassmeow:

Shit

Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no closer to being true.

While you are historically correct, many economists, tech experts (people who work with tech who are far from luddites), and even CEO’s of tech companies believe that with the increasing automation  of jobs, many jobs will go to machines and there will be a great, massive reduction in jobs. Economists both from the left and right think this is to be true since it’s already happening just not to a large extent YET. Even the Bureau of labor statistics projects massive job loss due to human jobs becoming obsolete because  technological changes that make it more efficient to replace humans with machines/computers since it will be cheaper, less error, and more efficient to replace humans since machines do not need to rest, do not have families, can be worked to their extreme, and can be programmed to do something correctly all the time. Moreover with the prospect of artificial intelligence which is being invested heavily, the change might manifest more rapidly. 
One remedy for this from some economists from both the left and right is to enact a universal basic income. But while I appreciate your skepticism, which is very healthy because i too have a disdain for predictions with no basis in reality or that sound alarmist- to my knowledge there seems to be a slow, growing consensus from many fields that technological progress will replace many many human jobs the extent to which they will replace them is obviously debatable but the fact that they will be replaced to some degree that affects us seems to not be. I’m sorry I can’t cite sources I’m on my phone at the moment.

Also,  throughout history technological progress has always replaced jobs.  There are less shoemakers now, farmers, cashiers, and countless other positions due to technological progress. Historically though,  we have been able to replace these jobs with new ones created through social change, technological change, and other factors but I and many think that we have hit a special time in history where technology will simply take over many more jobs than we can replace.  Technological progress is so advanced now that many products that we had to buy separately are now consolidated into one (an iphone is a fax machine, a phone, a computer, a camera, a tv, etc) and at times less people are needed in the aggregate to make these products.  
Lastly, and this is just semantics,  I do believe that many techno-optimists believe technological progress automatically means “good” because we associate the word technology with human advancement and because “progress” is  a word that assumes benevolence, but this is not the case. Technological and scientific progress are not inherently good.  I am no luddite and I am a lover of science BUT science and technological advancement are sometimes removed and unaware of the unintended consequences created by their advancement since we rarely know all the social, economic,  political, ramifications brought by said technology/scientific discoveries at the time of their creation and birth. So to assume everything will be a positive step forward is a naive assumption not supported by data but simply a subjective feeling of comfort and happiness because tech progress is being made. So i am no luddite, but I do think there is cause this time to be healthily afraid of what is to come.  A capitalist system has historically relied on humans but when those who own the means of production switch to a more inexpensive, rational, hard working, and anti-error prone substitute …. then what happens? It has never been done before so to assume you can use history as a guide (which is usually a very intelligent move) is somewhat misguided for what is to come has never happened before. 

c-bassmeow: cracked-pearl-78: c-bassmeow: Shit Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no close...

America, Cars, and Computers: Lee Fang @lhfang When robotics/driverless cars replace 1/3 jobs in America, and the political establishment does nothing, 2016 anger will look minuscule. 11/5/16, 10:03 PM 287 RETWEETS 497 LIKES cracked-pearl-78: c-bassmeow: Shit Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no closer to being true. While you are historically correct, many economists, tech experts (people who work with tech who are far from luddites), and even CEO’s of tech companies believe that with the increasing automation  of jobs, many jobs will go to machines and there will be a great, massive reduction in jobs. Economists both from the left and right think this is to be true since it’s already happening just not to a large extent YET. Even the Bureau of labor statistics projects massive job loss due to human jobs becoming obsolete because technological changes that make it more efficient to replace humans with machines/computers since it will be cheaper, less error, and more efficient to replace humans since machines do not need to rest, do not have families, can be worked to their extreme, and can be programmed to do something correctly all the time. Moreover with the prospect of artificial intelligence which is being invested heavily, the change might manifest more rapidly. One remedy for this from some economists from both the left and right is to enact a universal basic income. But while I appreciate your skepticism, which is very healthy because i too have a disdain for predictions with no basis in reality or that sound alarmist- to my knowledge there seems to be a slow, growing consensus from many fields that technological progress will replace many many human jobs the extent to which they will replace them is obviously debatable but the fact that they will be replaced to some degree that affects us seems to not be. I’m sorry I can’t cite sources I’m on my phone at the moment.Also,  throughout history technological progress has always replaced jobs.  There are less shoemakers now, farmers, cashiers, and countless other positions due to technological progress. Historically though,  we have been able to replace these jobs with new ones created through social change, technological change, and other factors but I and many think that we have hit a special time in history where technology will simply take over many more jobs than we can replace.  Technological progress is so advanced now that many products that we had to buy separately are now consolidated into one (an iphone is a fax machine, a phone, a computer, a camera, a tv, etc) and at times less people are needed in the aggregate to make these products.  Lastly, and this is just semantics,  I do believe that many techno-optimists believe technological progress automatically means “good” because we associate the word technology with human advancement and because “progress” is  a word that assumes benevolence, but this is not the case. Technological and scientific progress are not inherently good.  I am no luddite and I am a lover of science BUT science and technological advancement are sometimes removed and unaware of the unintended consequences created by their advancement since we rarely know all the social, economic, political, ramifications brought by said technology/scientific discoveries at the time of their creation and birth. So to assume everything will be a positive step forward is a naive assumption not supported by data but simply a subjective feeling of comfort and happiness because tech progress is being made. So i am no luddite, but I do think there is cause this time to be healthily afraid of what is to come.  A capitalist system has historically relied on humans but when those who own the means of production switch to a more inexpensive, rational, hard working, and anti-error prone substitute …. then what happens? It has never been done before so to assume you can use history as a guide (which is usually a very intelligent move) is somewhat misguided for what is to come has never happened before. 
America, Cars, and Computers: Lee Fang
 @lhfang
 When robotics/driverless cars replace 1/3
 jobs in America, and the political
 establishment does nothing, 2016 anger
 will look minuscule.
 11/5/16, 10:03 PM
 287 RETWEETS 497 LIKES
cracked-pearl-78:
c-bassmeow:

Shit

Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no closer to being true.

While you are historically correct, many economists, tech experts (people who work with tech who are far from luddites), and even CEO’s of tech companies believe that with the increasing automation  of jobs, many jobs will go to machines and there will be a great, massive reduction in jobs. Economists both from the left and right think this is to be true since it’s already happening just not to a large extent YET. Even the Bureau of labor statistics projects massive job loss due to human jobs becoming obsolete because  technological changes that make it more efficient to replace humans with machines/computers since it will be cheaper, less error, and more efficient to replace humans since machines do not need to rest, do not have families, can be worked to their extreme, and can be programmed to do something correctly all the time. Moreover with the prospect of artificial intelligence which is being invested heavily, the change might manifest more rapidly. One remedy for this from some economists from both the left and right is to enact a universal basic income. But while I appreciate your skepticism, which is very healthy because i too have a disdain for predictions with no basis in reality or that sound alarmist- to my knowledge there seems to be a slow, growing consensus from many fields that technological progress will replace many many human jobs the extent to which they will replace them is obviously debatable but the fact that they will be replaced to some degree that affects us seems to not be. I’m sorry I can’t cite sources I’m on my phone at the moment.Also,  throughout history technological progress has always replaced jobs.  There are less shoemakers now, farmers, cashiers, and countless other positions due to technological progress. Historically though,  we have been able to replace these jobs with new ones created through social change, technological change, and other factors but I and many think that we have hit a special time in history where technology will simply take over many more jobs than we can replace.  Technological progress is so advanced now that many products that we had to buy separately are now consolidated into one (an iphone is a fax machine, a phone, a computer, a camera, a tv, etc) and at times less people are needed in the aggregate to make these products.  Lastly, and this is just semantics,  I do believe that many techno-optimists believe technological progress automatically means “good” because we associate the word technology with human advancement and because “progress” is  a word that assumes benevolence, but this is not the case. Technological and scientific progress are not inherently good.  I am no luddite and I am a lover of science BUT science and technological advancement are sometimes removed and unaware of the unintended consequences created by their advancement since we rarely know all the social, economic,  political, ramifications brought by said technology/scientific discoveries at the time of their creation and birth. So to assume everything will be a positive step forward is a naive assumption not supported by data but simply a subjective feeling of comfort and happiness because tech progress is being made. So i am no luddite, but I do think there is cause this time to be healthily afraid of what is to come.  A capitalist system has historically relied on humans but when those who own the means of production switch to a more inexpensive, rational, hard working, and anti-error prone substitute …. then what happens? It has never been done before so to assume you can use history as a guide (which is usually a very intelligent move) is somewhat misguided for what is to come has never happened before. 

cracked-pearl-78: c-bassmeow: Shit Luddites have been making this claim since the Industrial Revolution and they are no closer to being tr...

Anaconda, Andrew Bogut, and Craig: vacation, and competitive pay ations must be submitte y by 6:00 pm on Fax resume to: Wednesday, March 6,2013 970-870-3490 or email resumes to: o Glass staller Please visit: lagency.governmentjobs.com/c lorada/default.ctmactionsview Job ObiD 6401448&hit count yes&hea for local shop, ex ssary, Glazing exp Must be detail orien good communicator promo 8transEyecare Specialties is expanding er 0&WDDX.JobSearch announces a full-time opening -%3Cwdd, Packet%20ver Paramb írni.3D%271%2E0%27%3E%3Chea g office, for an optician with er sis on customer service and retail You must be detail-orented, comfo GORY0%27%3E%3Cstring%3E96%2 with technology, enjoy working c13%2C1%202%2C45%2C72%2016 I-paced envirorsment and pass, 3%2C141%2C4%20:130%2C150%X 1.aptitude test Willing to trai 5%2C131%2C142%2C73%2C143%2 ght person, Bonofits, convertit ve ce%2C127%20201%2C81 %20157562 dlifun working atmosphere P C87%2C82%2C40%2C C10%2011%2C154%2050%2C1t lay, State 110, Craig, CO 81625 c C100%2C118%2C140%2C16%20 DJulie at 970-824-1132 %2C173%2C 1 7%20: 1 8%2C 70%2C 1 0 1%20A4%2C 19%2C66%2C41 %2C20 %2C42%2C134%2C164%2C22%206 Part tirne in home iteetth worker re- sac43%2C1 1 2%2C148%2C53%2C tent on vertalatox Sonne metical ." 102%2C24%2C47%2C136%2C84%2 nce, will traan FwKresarne 879 16 C70%2C 161 %2C1 21 %20a2%2C137 %2C 100%20 130%2C33%2C1 51%2C 122%2C35%2C86 MANSFIELD 144%2C97%2 ing your resum, to 1111 w v ositions Available stered Nurses usekeepers hen Helpons ities Assistant mation or to apply mansfield.org or 879-7125 Professional 110%2cag%3C%2F string%11%30% 2Fvar%3E% R.N, Robinson & Son, 1. PROMOTIONAL JOBSNZr%3E%3Cstri ng%3E%3C%2F string%3E %3C%2F var%3E%3Cvar%20name%3D%27T R AISFER%27%31%3Cstring%110% 3 С%25 string%3E%3C%21 van We are currently seehing a Opportunity" and the poon designed for advancenmond A certain level of "On he Jb training is expected me%3D%2711ND KEY wORD%27%DE %1Cstring%11% string%3E%3C%21 vir%11%3C%2 ftruct%3E%3C%2F data%3E%3C%2 y Inn, Craig, CO owing positions to begin the application process 250 W Lincon Ave Hayden, co 979270- 32
Anaconda, Andrew Bogut, and Craig: vacation, and competitive pay
 ations must be submitte
 y by 6:00 pm on
 Fax resume to:
 Wednesday, March 6,2013
 970-870-3490
 or email resumes to:
 o Glass
 staller
 Please visit:
 lagency.governmentjobs.com/c
 lorada/default.ctmactionsview Job
 ObiD 6401448&hit count yes&hea
 for local shop, ex
 ssary, Glazing exp
 Must be detail orien
 good communicator
 promo 8transEyecare Specialties is expanding
 er 0&WDDX.JobSearch
 announces a full-time opening
 -%3Cwdd, Packet%20ver
 Paramb
 írni.3D%271%2E0%27%3E%3Chea
 g office, for
 an optician with er
 sis on customer service and retail
 You must be detail-orented, comfo
 GORY0%27%3E%3Cstring%3E96%2 with technology, enjoy working
 c13%2C1%202%2C45%2C72%2016 I-paced envirorsment and pass,
 3%2C141%2C4%20:130%2C150%X 1.aptitude test Willing to trai
 5%2C131%2C142%2C73%2C143%2 ght person, Bonofits, convertit ve
 ce%2C127%20201%2C81 %20157562 dlifun working atmosphere P
 C87%2C82%2C40%2C
 C10%2011%2C154%2050%2C1t lay, State 110, Craig, CO 81625 c
 C100%2C118%2C140%2C16%20 DJulie at 970-824-1132
 %2C173%2C 1 7%20: 1 8%2C 70%2C 1 0
 1%20A4%2C 19%2C66%2C41 %2C20
 %2C42%2C134%2C164%2C22%206 Part tirne in home iteetth worker re-
 sac43%2C1 1 2%2C148%2C53%2C tent on vertalatox Sonne metical ."
 102%2C24%2C47%2C136%2C84%2 nce, will traan FwKresarne 879 16
 C70%2C 161 %2C1 21 %20a2%2C137
 %2C 100%20 130%2C33%2C1 51%2C
 122%2C35%2C86
 MANSFIELD
 144%2C97%2
 ing your resum, to 1111 w v
 ositions Available
 stered Nurses
 usekeepers
 hen Helpons
 ities Assistant
 mation or to apply
 mansfield.org or
 879-7125
 Professional
 110%2cag%3C%2F string%11%30%
 2Fvar%3E%
 R.N, Robinson &
 Son, 1.
 PROMOTIONAL JOBSNZr%3E%3Cstri
 ng%3E%3C%2F string%3E %3C%2F
 var%3E%3Cvar%20name%3D%27T R
 AISFER%27%31%3Cstring%110% 3
 С%25 string%3E%3C%21 van
 We are currently seehing a
 Opportunity" and the poon
 designed for advancenmond
 A certain level of "On he Jb
 training is expected
 me%3D%2711ND
 KEY
 wORD%27%DE %1Cstring%11%
 string%3E%3C%21 vir%11%3C%2
 ftruct%3E%3C%2F data%3E%3C%2
 y Inn, Craig, CO
 owing positions
 to begin the application
 process
 250 W Lincon Ave Hayden, co
 979270- 32