Punch Up
Punch Up

Punch Up

Quickly
Quickly

Quickly

Peering
Peering

Peering

peer
peer

peer

experimenting
 experimenting

experimenting

noted
noted

noted

develope
develope

develope

creativity
creativity

creativity

relevent
relevent

relevent

gains
gains

gains

🔥 | Latest

cnn.com, Facepalm, and Martin: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago CNN legal analyst Areva Martin accuses David Webb of 'white privilege' before learning he's black By Brian Flood | Fox News 10 10 i Tegal alalys Areva Martin on Tuesday Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation host David Webb of "white privilege" during a segment on a radio program before he broke the news "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME The embarrassing moment occurred during a discussion about experience being more important than race when determining whether or not someone is qualified for a particular job 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in each one. I never considered my color the issue, I considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said "That's a whole, another long conversation about white privilege, the things that you have the privilege of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the Truth." A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the privilege of white privilege?" 15 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP, STUDY INDICATES Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white male you have white privilege." The Fox Nation host then explained that he was actually black "I stand corrected," Martin said Webb scolded Martin for running with an "assumption" and she then blamed her team for providing inaccurate information "That's actually insulting," Webb saic "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given wrong information." 15 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for comment White privilege ????
cnn.com, Facepalm, and Martin: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????

White privilege ????

cnn.com, Martin, and News: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago CNN legal analyst Areva Martin accuses David Webb of 'white privilege' before learning he's black By Brian Flood | Fox News 10 10 i Tegal alalys Areva Martin on Tuesday Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation host David Webb of "white privilege" during a segment on a radio program before he broke the news "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME The embarrassing moment occurred during a discussion about experience being more important than race when determining whether or not someone is qualified for a particular job 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in each one. I never considered my color the issue, I considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said "That's a whole, another long conversation about white privilege, the things that you have the privilege of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the Truth." A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the privilege of white privilege?" 15 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP, STUDY INDICATES Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white male you have white privilege." The Fox Nation host then explained that he was actually black "I stand corrected," Martin said Webb scolded Martin for running with an "assumption" and she then blamed her team for providing inaccurate information "That's actually insulting," Webb saic "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given wrong information." 15 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for comment White privilege ????
cnn.com, Martin, and News: MEDIA . Published January 15, 2019 . Last Update an hour ago
 CNN legal analyst Areva
 Martin accuses David Webb
 of 'white privilege' before
 learning he's black
 By Brian Flood | Fox News
 10
 10

 i
 Tegal
 alalys
 Areva Martin on Tuesday
 Martin accused Sirius XM radio and Fox Nation
 host David Webb of "white privilege" during a
 segment on a radio program before he broke the
 news
 "Areva, I hate to break it to you, but you should've
 been better prepped. I'm black," Webb said
 MSNBC'S STEPHANIE RUHLE IMPLIES TRUMP IS
 BLACKMAILING LINDSEY GRAHAM OVER
 SOMETHING PRETTY EXTREME
 The embarrassing moment occurred during a
 discussion about experience being more important
 than race when determining whether or not someone
 is qualified for a particular job

 'Ve Choseh to cross dlTrerent parts of the medla
 world, done the work so that I'm qualified to be in
 each one. I never considered my color the issue, I
 considered my qualifications the issue," Webb said
 "That's a whole, another long conversation about
 white privilege, the things that you have the privilege
 of doing, that people of color don't have the privilege
 of." said Martin-who also hosts CBS' "Face the
 Truth."
 A dumbfounded Webb asked, "How do I have the
 privilege of white privilege?"
 15
 NETWORKS' NIGHTLY NEWSCASTS HAVE
 INCESSANTLY HOSTILE' TONE TOWARD TRUMFP,
 STUDY INDICATES

 Martin responded, "David, by virtue of being a white
 male you have white privilege."
 The Fox Nation host then explained that he was
 actually black
 "I stand corrected," Martin said
 Webb scolded Martin for running with an
 "assumption" and she then blamed her team for
 providing inaccurate information
 "That's actually insulting," Webb saic
 "It is and I apologize," Martin replied. "l was given
 wrong information."
 15
 Martin's spokesperson declined a request for
 comment
White privilege ????

White privilege ????

Apparently, Beer, and Dude: Emily Holmes January 2 at 11:26 AM Liberal Friends, listen to this right now: Democratic Nominees are not clay pigeons I repeat. DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES ARE NOT CLAY PIGEONS But, Emily, whatever do you mean? What is this metaphor? It goes like this One by one, over the next couple of months, Democratic nominees are going to launch their official bids for President. They are going to launch themselves, one by one, into the sky, right into our line of vision Our job is not to shoot them. Our job is NOT, the second we see them cross the sky, to reach out for the gun being handed to us by conservatives (because duh, conservatives and guns) and take aim, and blast them, one by one out of the air, for not being absolutely perfect. Not likeable enough. BOOM Not an inspiring enough speaker. BOOM Said that awkward thing that one time. BOOM I wouldn't want to have a beer with them. BOOM Too old. BOOM. Too female. BOOM. Too white. BOOM Not a fucking flawless progressive superhero. BOOM Because what happens next? We shoot the candidates down. We degrade them. We belittle them. We smear them. Then we hand the gun to the media. They do the same. They hand the gun to the conservatives. They do the same. Then the bots start reloading. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM And then at the end of primary season, we have to pick up the shattered remains of whoever got the most votes and attempt to glue them back together into a candidate who can win the general election. And we will lose. Because we learned fucking NOTHING from 2016, apparently Trump didn't win because every conservative loves him. Most of them hate his fucking guts. But they held their noses and voted for him because he was the only way to push their agenda forward. And holy shit, have they pushed it. Despite his complete ineptitude, his bumbling, his gross incompetence, his blatant corruption, they have shoved through some really damaging policies that are hurting real people every single day, and they will continue to do so for as long as we let them So, here we are. You're not jazzed about Liz Warren? Awesome. Beto not your boy? Swell. Sick of Biden memes? Good for you, friend. Keep it to yourself. Why? Because EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT WHO RUNS IS INFINITELY BETTER FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY THAN THE FLAMING RACIST POPULIST TRASH CURRENTLY STEERING THIS COUNTRY DIRECTLY INTO THE SUN. I'm not sure if you noticed, but we already elected a guy based on a cult of personality rather than on whether he was qualified in any way to do the iob, and we're going to be putting out the flames for DECADES But what do we do instead, you ask? Watch debates. Compare platforms Be informed. Choose your favorite BASED ON REAL FACTUAL POLICIES AND EXPERIENCE, NOT ON YOUR DELICATE FEELINGS AND WHETHER YOU FEEL SUFFICIENTLY ENTERTAINED OR INEXPLICABLY HAPPY AT THE VERY SIGHT OF THEIR GLOWING FACE. Then get involved. Register people. Drive to the polls. Hold signs on street corners. Write postcards Knock on doors. Don't tell us why the other candidates suck, tell us why yours is THE BEST. Fight FOR them. Remember how we used to fight FOR things, rather than against them? I know Trump makes it hard to remember, but I promise, that's a thing we used to know how to do Then we all, collectively, wholeheartedly, throw our weight and energy and voice behind whoever gets the nomination. If we do that, we win. Period It's not a question of who can beat Trump, don't you get it? A sentient fucking houseplant with a liberal platform could beat Trump, if we do this right. It's a question of whether WE can beat him, or would we rather tear ourselves apart? Look around you, folks. The stock market is in free-fall. Our international reputation is in tatters. Our foreign policy is for sale to dictators. Our free press is under daily attack. Our Supreme Court is one conservative white dude away from full-on Gilead, and we can't keep asking an 84-year-old woman recovering from broken ribs and a third bout of cancer to hang on for six more years because we can't get our heads out of our own asses. I mean, she'll do it, obviously, because RBG is a BOSS, but she shouldn't have to. I repeat. This is not a test of our candidates. There are lots of good, solid options. It's a test of US. Of OUR ability to unite. Of OUR strength. Of OUR ability to put aside selfish arbitrary purity tests and scales of "likeability" and to just FUCKING GET IT DONE. We don't need the perfect candidate to rescue us. We need to realize that we can rescue ourselves So, how about it, Resistance? They want us to forget that we have the numbers, the motivation, and the power. They want us to implode. Let's explode instead, and leave nothing but a charred ruin of this nightmare administration in our wake. BOOM 1.4K Comments 6.7K Shares onceuponamirror: helenofhere: snarksandkisses: Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind: This is the most important post on this platform since early 2016. WE ARE NOT FUCKING IT UP TWICE. DO NOT LET PROPAGANDA AND MANIPULATION DIVIDE US AGAINST GETTING THIS MONSTER OUT. thanks
Apparently, Beer, and Dude: Emily Holmes
 January 2 at 11:26 AM
 Liberal Friends, listen to this right now: Democratic Nominees are not clay
 pigeons
 I repeat.
 DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES ARE NOT CLAY PIGEONS
 But, Emily, whatever do you mean? What is this metaphor?
 It goes like this
 One by one, over the next couple of months, Democratic nominees are
 going to launch their official bids for President. They are going to launch
 themselves, one by one, into the sky, right into our line of vision
 Our job is not to shoot them.
 Our job is NOT, the second we see them cross the sky, to reach out for the
 gun being handed to us by conservatives (because duh, conservatives and
 guns) and take aim, and blast them, one by one out of the air, for not being
 absolutely perfect.
 Not likeable enough. BOOM
 Not an inspiring enough speaker. BOOM
 Said that awkward thing that one time. BOOM
 I wouldn't want to have a beer with them. BOOM
 Too old. BOOM. Too female. BOOM. Too white. BOOM
 Not a fucking flawless progressive superhero. BOOM
 Because what happens next? We shoot the candidates down. We degrade
 them. We belittle them. We smear them. Then we hand the gun to the
 media. They do the same. They hand the gun to the conservatives. They do
 the same. Then the bots start reloading. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM
 And then at the end of primary season, we have to pick up the shattered
 remains of whoever got the most votes and attempt to glue them back
 together into a candidate who can win the general election.
 And we will lose. Because we learned fucking NOTHING from 2016,
 apparently
 Trump didn't win because every conservative loves him. Most of them hate
 his fucking guts. But they held their noses and voted for him because he
 was the only way to push their agenda forward. And holy shit, have they
 pushed it. Despite his complete ineptitude, his bumbling, his gross
 incompetence, his blatant corruption, they have shoved through some
 really damaging policies that are hurting real people every single day, and
 they will continue to do so for as long as we let them

 So, here we are. You're not jazzed about Liz Warren? Awesome. Beto not
 your boy? Swell. Sick of Biden memes? Good for you, friend. Keep it to
 yourself. Why? Because EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT WHO RUNS IS
 INFINITELY BETTER FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY THAN THE
 FLAMING RACIST POPULIST TRASH CURRENTLY STEERING THIS
 COUNTRY DIRECTLY INTO THE SUN.
 I'm not sure if you noticed, but we already elected a guy based on a cult of
 personality rather than on whether he was qualified in any way to do the
 iob, and we're going to be putting out the flames for DECADES
 But what do we do instead, you ask? Watch debates. Compare platforms
 Be informed. Choose your favorite BASED ON REAL FACTUAL POLICIES
 AND EXPERIENCE, NOT ON YOUR DELICATE FEELINGS AND WHETHER
 YOU FEEL SUFFICIENTLY ENTERTAINED OR INEXPLICABLY HAPPY AT THE
 VERY SIGHT OF THEIR GLOWING FACE. Then get involved. Register
 people. Drive to the polls. Hold signs on street corners. Write postcards
 Knock on doors. Don't tell us why the other candidates suck, tell us why
 yours is THE BEST. Fight FOR them. Remember how we used to fight FOR
 things, rather than against them? I know Trump makes it hard to remember,
 but I promise, that's a thing we used to know how to do
 Then we all, collectively, wholeheartedly, throw our weight and energy and
 voice behind whoever gets the nomination. If we do that, we win. Period
 It's not a question of who can beat Trump, don't you get it? A sentient
 fucking houseplant with a liberal platform could beat Trump, if we do this
 right. It's a question of whether WE can beat him, or would we rather tear
 ourselves apart?
 Look around you, folks. The stock market is in free-fall. Our international
 reputation is in tatters. Our foreign policy is for sale to dictators. Our free
 press is under daily attack. Our Supreme Court is one conservative white
 dude away from full-on Gilead, and we can't keep asking an 84-year-old
 woman recovering from broken ribs and a third bout of cancer to hang on
 for six more years because we can't get our heads out of our own asses. I
 mean, she'll do it, obviously, because RBG is a BOSS, but she shouldn't
 have to.
 I repeat. This is not a test of our candidates. There are lots of good, solid
 options. It's a test of US. Of OUR ability to unite. Of OUR strength. Of OUR
 ability to put aside selfish arbitrary purity tests and scales of "likeability"
 and to just FUCKING GET IT DONE. We don't need the perfect candidate to
 rescue us. We need to realize that we can rescue ourselves
 So, how about it, Resistance? They want us to forget that we have the
 numbers, the motivation, and the power. They want us to implode. Let's
 explode instead, and leave nothing but a charred ruin of this nightmare
 administration in our wake.
 BOOM
 1.4K Comments 6.7K Shares
onceuponamirror:

helenofhere:

snarksandkisses:


Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind:


This is the most important post on this platform since early 2016. 


WE ARE NOT FUCKING IT UP TWICE. DO NOT LET PROPAGANDA AND MANIPULATION DIVIDE US AGAINST GETTING THIS MONSTER OUT. thanks

onceuponamirror: helenofhere: snarksandkisses: Also good to keep THIS SHIT in mind: This is the most important post on this platform s...

At-St, Children, and Dogs: When my toddler punches my dog, my dog growls at him. How do I stop my dog from growling at my son? Marnie Bell, studied at St Margaret's Anglican Girls' School Updated Fri Upvoted by Erika Wiggins, I trained all of my dogs to Canine Good Companion standards. and Caitie Foster, has 20+ yrs experience living with and learning about dogs. Get rid of it. If it can't follow basic directions by now, that kid is never going to be able to. Take it back to the hospital where you had it and tell them that the child just doesn't fit in to your family. They can arrange for a new home for the kid. ALTERNATIVELY you could teach your toddler to respect the dog. Growling is your warning. It's a VERY clear message that the dog is distressed about something (if your toddler punched me, I'd growl too). Your dog can't talk. Growling and body language is the only way he has to tell you that he's upset. So -Why are you letting the child punch the dog?! What is wrong with you?! You need to teach your child how to be gentle and respectful of your dog. If you don't, and the child's atrocious behavior continues, expect the next time to end in your child being bitten. Theres not much that grinds my gears as much as dogs being put down or labeled 'vicious because of stupid, irresponsible owners. Separate the 2 of them as much as possible until you can be the owner & parent your poor dog deserves. People like this do not deserve to have dogs or children 😡
At-St, Children, and Dogs: When my toddler punches my dog, my dog growls at him.
 How do I stop my dog from growling at my son?
 Marnie Bell, studied at St Margaret's Anglican Girls' School
 Updated Fri Upvoted by Erika Wiggins, I trained all of my dogs to Canine
 Good Companion standards. and Caitie Foster, has 20+ yrs experience living
 with and learning about dogs.
 Get rid of it. If it can't follow basic directions by now, that kid is never going
 to be able to. Take it back to the hospital where you had it and tell them that
 the child just doesn't fit in to your family. They can arrange for a new home
 for the kid.
 ALTERNATIVELY you could teach your toddler to respect the dog. Growling
 is your warning. It's a VERY clear message that the dog is distressed about
 something (if your toddler punched me, I'd growl too). Your dog can't talk.
 Growling and body language is the only way he has to tell you that he's
 upset.
 So -Why are you letting the child punch the dog?! What is wrong with you?!
 You need to teach your child how to be gentle and respectful of your dog. If
 you don't, and the child's atrocious behavior continues, expect the next
 time to end in your child being bitten.
 Theres not much that grinds my gears as much as dogs being put down or
 labeled 'vicious because of stupid, irresponsible owners. Separate the 2 of
 them as much as possible until you can be the owner & parent your poor dog
 deserves.
People like this do not deserve to have dogs or children 😡

People like this do not deserve to have dogs or children 😡