Are
Are

Are

Colloquialism
Colloquialism

Colloquialism

Statae
Statae

Statae

drunkhistory
 drunkhistory

drunkhistory

a promise
 a promise

a promise

others
 others

others

need
 need

need

way
 way

way

evidently
evidently

evidently

enthralling
enthralling

enthralling

🔥 | Latest

efficacy: WPLN - Nashville Public Radio pIn @WPLN Follow As he heads back to prison, a Nashville man says 'goodbye' to the new life he hoped to build: bit.ly/21K89YHH 5:30 AM - 25 May 2018 1,806 Retweets 2,445 Likes Matt Walsh Follow @MattWalshBlog He's sentenced to 35 years for selling rehabilitates himself, is released, finds a crack. He serves over 20 years, job and starts a new life, and now is being sent back for another 10 years because the original release was an error." This is unjust, inhumane, and immoral. WPLN - Nashville Public Radio WPLN As he heads back to prison, a Nashville man says 'goodbye' to the new life he hoped to build: bit.ly/21K89YH 10:48 AM - 27 May 2018 51,001 Retweets 91,996 Likes Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog Follow And 35 years is a ludicrous sentence for a non violent drug offense. There are rapists and child molesters who don't get that kind of time. 10:51 AM - 27 May 2018 2,298 Retweets 10,019 Likes ) <p><a href="http://cisnowflake.tumblr.com/post/174707065646/lastsonlost-ikariyuiofficial" class="tumblr_blog">cisnowflake</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://lastsonlost.tumblr.com/post/174706988952/ikariyuiofficial-pinkcheesegreenghost" class="tumblr_blog">lastsonlost</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://ikariyuiofficial.tumblr.com/post/174597974677/pinkcheesegreenghost-otsitsyataka" class="tumblr_blog">ikariyuiofficial</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://pinkcheesegreenghost.tumblr.com/post/174358723843/otsitsyataka-gahdamnpunk-an-error-is-this" class="tumblr_blog">pinkcheesegreenghost</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://otsitsyataka.tumblr.com/post/174357484423/gahdamnpunk-an-error-is-this-even-legal-35" class="tumblr_blog">otsitsyataka</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://gahdamnpunk.tumblr.com/post/174353587224/an-error-is-this-even-legal-35-years-for-a-non" class="tumblr_blog">gahdamnpunk</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>An error? Is this even legal??<br/></p> <p>35 YEARS FOR A <b>NON VIOLENT</b> DRUG OFFENSE</p> <p>Fuck you, America’s criminal justice system<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>This is heartbreaking 💔</p> </blockquote> <p>his name is <a href="http://nashvillepublicradio.org/post/he-heads-back-prison-nashville-man-says-goodbye-new-life-he-hoped-build#stream/0">Matthew Charles</a></p> </blockquote> <p>Ways you can help:</p> <p><a href="https://www.gofundme.com/matthew-charles-legal-fund">Donate to the GoFundMe raising money for Matthew’s legal costs.</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.change.org/p/president-trump-commute-matthew-charles-prison-sentence">Sign the Change.org petition asking for clemency</a> (though the efficacy of this is sorely debated)</p> </blockquote> <p>Did the state literally just pulled “backsies” on this nigga?</p> </blockquote> <p>Oh just let the man go for fucks sake. As long as he didn’t do anything violent and he isn’t breaking any laws now who cares? </p> </blockquote>
efficacy: WPLN - Nashville Public Radio
 pIn @WPLN
 Follow
 As he heads back to prison, a Nashville man
 says 'goodbye' to the new life he hoped to
 build: bit.ly/21K89YHH
 5:30 AM - 25 May 2018
 1,806 Retweets 2,445 Likes

 Matt Walsh
 Follow
 @MattWalshBlog
 He's sentenced to 35 years for selling
 rehabilitates himself, is released, finds a
 crack. He serves over 20 years,
 job and starts a new life, and now is
 being sent back for another 10 years
 because the original release was an
 error."
 This is unjust, inhumane, and immoral.
 WPLN - Nashville Public Radio WPLN
 As he heads back to prison, a Nashville man says 'goodbye'
 to the new life he hoped to build: bit.ly/21K89YH
 10:48 AM - 27 May 2018
 51,001 Retweets 91,996 Likes

 Matt Walsh
 @MattWalshBlog
 Follow
 And 35 years is a ludicrous sentence for
 a non violent drug offense. There are
 rapists and child molesters who don't get
 that kind of time.
 10:51 AM - 27 May 2018
 2,298 Retweets 10,019 Likes
 )
<p><a href="http://cisnowflake.tumblr.com/post/174707065646/lastsonlost-ikariyuiofficial" class="tumblr_blog">cisnowflake</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://lastsonlost.tumblr.com/post/174706988952/ikariyuiofficial-pinkcheesegreenghost" class="tumblr_blog">lastsonlost</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ikariyuiofficial.tumblr.com/post/174597974677/pinkcheesegreenghost-otsitsyataka" class="tumblr_blog">ikariyuiofficial</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://pinkcheesegreenghost.tumblr.com/post/174358723843/otsitsyataka-gahdamnpunk-an-error-is-this" class="tumblr_blog">pinkcheesegreenghost</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://otsitsyataka.tumblr.com/post/174357484423/gahdamnpunk-an-error-is-this-even-legal-35" class="tumblr_blog">otsitsyataka</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://gahdamnpunk.tumblr.com/post/174353587224/an-error-is-this-even-legal-35-years-for-a-non" class="tumblr_blog">gahdamnpunk</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>An error? Is this even legal??<br/></p>
<p>35 YEARS FOR A <b>NON VIOLENT</b> DRUG OFFENSE</p>
<p>Fuck you, America’s criminal justice system<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is heartbreaking 💔</p>
</blockquote>
<p>his name is <a href="http://nashvillepublicradio.org/post/he-heads-back-prison-nashville-man-says-goodbye-new-life-he-hoped-build#stream/0">Matthew Charles</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ways you can help:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gofundme.com/matthew-charles-legal-fund">Donate to the GoFundMe raising money for Matthew’s legal costs.</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.change.org/p/president-trump-commute-matthew-charles-prison-sentence">Sign the Change.org petition asking for clemency</a> (though the efficacy of this is sorely debated)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Did the state literally just pulled “backsies” on this nigga?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Oh just let the man go for fucks sake. As long as he didn’t do anything violent and he isn’t breaking any laws now who cares? </p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://cisnowflake.tumblr.com/post/174707065646/lastsonlost-ikariyuiofficial" class="tumblr_blog">cisnowflake</a>:</p><blockq...

efficacy: IF IT'S STILL IN YOUR MIND IT IS WORTH TAKING THE RISK @MILLIONAIRE MENTOR As you look back on your life… where do you wished you’d been a little braver, trusted in yourself more, and been less cautious in the chances you took? 🤔 Often we know what it is we want to do, but we still don't do it. Why? We are innately risk averse and afraid of putting our vulnerability on the line. ✔️ Fight the negativity bias. Every decision, including the decision to do nothing, carries some element of risk. Risky behavior is everywhere. Instead of fixating on the consequences of a risk you’ve never attempted, try to evaluate the entire scenario, including any potential hazards. ✔️ Build self-efficacy. “All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better.” A great quote by Ralph Waldo E. (You better know who he is) So the more experiments you make, the better you get at making them. And the more risks you take, the more positive your risk experiences become. If the idea of risk-taking still makes your palms sweat, try to increase your comfort level by taking a small risk before embarking on a bigger one. ✔️Be intelligent with your risks. It’s important to add that building confidence in risk-taking doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll take smart risks. It might be helpful to build in parameters or conditions for each risky decision. 😉 - Guys, I hope my tips are helping you in any way and not just *like* the post and ignore the content, USE IT! - risk action success millionairementor
efficacy: IF IT'S STILL IN YOUR MIND
 IT IS WORTH TAKING THE RISK
 @MILLIONAIRE MENTOR
As you look back on your life… where do you wished you’d been a little braver, trusted in yourself more, and been less cautious in the chances you took? 🤔 Often we know what it is we want to do, but we still don't do it. Why? We are innately risk averse and afraid of putting our vulnerability on the line. ✔️ Fight the negativity bias. Every decision, including the decision to do nothing, carries some element of risk. Risky behavior is everywhere. Instead of fixating on the consequences of a risk you’ve never attempted, try to evaluate the entire scenario, including any potential hazards. ✔️ Build self-efficacy. “All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better.” A great quote by Ralph Waldo E. (You better know who he is) So the more experiments you make, the better you get at making them. And the more risks you take, the more positive your risk experiences become. If the idea of risk-taking still makes your palms sweat, try to increase your comfort level by taking a small risk before embarking on a bigger one. ✔️Be intelligent with your risks. It’s important to add that building confidence in risk-taking doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll take smart risks. It might be helpful to build in parameters or conditions for each risky decision. 😉 - Guys, I hope my tips are helping you in any way and not just *like* the post and ignore the content, USE IT! - risk action success millionairementor

As you look back on your life… where do you wished you’d been a little braver, trusted in yourself more, and been less cautious in the ch...

efficacy: ITS EASY TO FORGET THAT FOR DECADES THE U.S. HAD A HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT WAS THE ENVY OF THE WORLD. WE HAD THE FINEST DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS, PATIENTS RECEIVED HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE MEDICAL CARE, AND THOUSANDS OF PRIVATELY FUNDED CHARITIES PROVIDED HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE PO0 RON PAUL TURNING POINT USA <p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://bushmeat.tumblr.com/" title="bushmeat">bushmeat</a> said:</p><blockquote><p>When they tell you how ghastly socialised healthcare is, remember what they are saying is absolute bullshit <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253</a></p></blockquote><p>If I had a nickel every time some leftist moron linked to a World Healthcare Organization or Commonwealth Fund study, well, I would have a shitload of nickels.</p><p>Since my previous source’s website is currently down–<a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/142352613032/that-red-guy-montypla-weaselwonderworld">which I’ve used in the past</a> to slap this idiotic notion that other countries’ healthcare systems are somehow superior the US’s private system–I’ll instead point to this <a href="https://object.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa654.pdf">other great explanation</a> by the folks over at CATO on why this pathetic claim is always made by these left-wing think-tanks:</p><blockquote><p><i> The debate over how to reform America’s health care sector often involves comparisons between the United States and other countries, and with good reason. Looking at other countries can help us learn which policies, if any, to emulate, and which to avoid. </i></p><p><i>There have been many attempts at international health care system comparisons.Among the most influential are the World Health Report 2000 published by the World Health Organization, several studies published by the Commonwealth Fund, and individual measures such as infant mortality and “mortality amenable to health care.” Generally in these studies, the United States performs poorly in comparison to Europe, Australia, and Japan. Therefore, scholars often use the studies to argue for adding even more government regulations to our already highly regulated health care system. </i></p><p><i>However, these studies suffer from several problems. First, they often rely on unadjusted aggregate data—such as life expectancy, or mortality from heart disease—that can be affected by many non–health care factors, including nutrition, exercise, and even crime rates. Second,they often use process measures, such as how many patients have received a pap smear or mammogram in the past three years. Process measures tell us what doctors do, but provide only an indirect measure of doctors’ productivity. Third, some of these studies inappropriately incorporate their own biases about financing in their statistics, which makes market-driven health systems appear worse even if their outcomes are similar or better. </i></p><p><i>An additional limitation of these studies is the omission of any measure of innovation. None of the best-known studies factor in the contribution of various countries to the advances that have come to characterize the current practice of health care in the developed world. </i></p><p><i>Every single health care test or treatment must be invented at some point. We would be living in a different world today were it not for the remarkable genius and hard work of health care inventors in the past, as well as investments from government health agencies and pharmaceutical and medical device companies. The health care issues commonly considered most important today—controlling costs and covering the uninsured— arguably should be regarded as secondary to innovation, inasmuch as a treatment must first be invented before its costs can be reduced and its use extended to everyone. </i><br/></p></blockquote><p>Furthermore, from another Glen Whitman <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp101.pdf">article</a>:</p><blockquote><p><i> Those who cite the WHO rankings typically present them as an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially on a number of underlying assumptions- some of them logically incoherent, some characterized by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone shares. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO health care rankings result from an index of health-related statistics. As with any index, it is important to consider how it was constructed, as the construction affects the results. </i><br/></p><p><i> There is good reason to account for the quality of care received by a country’s worst-off or poorest citizens. Yet the Health Distribution and Responsiveness Distribution factors do not do that.Instead, they measure relative differences in quality, without regard to the absolute level of quality. To account for the quality of care received by the worst-off, the index could include a factor that measures health among the poor, or a health care system’s responsiveness to the poor. This would, in essence, give greater weight to the well-being of the worst off.  Alternatively, a separate health performance index could be constructed for poor households or members of disadvantaged minorities. These approaches would surely have problems of their own, but they would at least be focused on the absolute level of health care quality, which should be the paramount concern. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO rankings, by purporting to measure the efficacy of health care systems, implicitly take all differences in health outcomes not explained by spending or literacy and attribute them entirely to health care system performance. Nothing else, from tobacco use to nutrition to sheer luck, is taken into account. </i></p><p><i>To some extent, the exclusion of other variables is simply the result of inadequacies in the data. It is difficult to get information on all relevant factors, and even more difficult to account for their expected effects on health. But some factors are deliberately excluded by the WHO analysis on the basis of paternalistic assumptions about the proper role of health systems. An earlier paper laying out the WHO methodological framework asserts, “Problems such as tobacco consumption, diet, and unsafe sexual activity must be included in an assessment of health system performance.” </i></p><p><i>In other words, the WHO approach holds health systems responsible not just for treating lung cancer, but for preventing smoking in the first place; not just for treating heart disease, but for getting people to exercise and lay off the fatty foods. <br/></i></p><p><i> Second, the WHO approach fails to consider people’s willingness to trade off health against other values. Some people are happy to give up a few potential months or even years of life in exchange for the pleasures of smoking, eating, having sex, playing sports, and so on. The WHO approach, rather than taking the public’s preferences as given, deems some preferences better than others (and then praises or blames the health system for them). </i></p><p><i>A superior (though still imperfect) approach would take people’s health-related behavior as given, and then ask which health systems do the best job of dealing with whatever health conditions arise.<br/></i></p></blockquote><p>In other words, its a bunch of meaningless cherry-picked measurements framed in a way to make the private system appear terrible in order to push for more socialized medicine.  </p><p>Despite all of it’s flaws, which are usually thanks to government market intervention, the United States still has the best health care system on the entire goddamn planet per capita.  It’s most likely that the life-saving equipment and procedures that are used in other hellholes using slave healthcare to save lives are thanks to us.  </p><p>You’re welcome.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b97a460c917c68f3900de0bc46e50c59/tumblr_inline_owpcxquafE1r1jtxd_540.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote>
efficacy: ITS EASY TO FORGET THAT
 FOR DECADES THE U.S. HAD A
 HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT WAS THE
 ENVY OF THE WORLD. WE HAD THE
 FINEST DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS,
 PATIENTS RECEIVED HIGH QUALITY,
 AFFORDABLE MEDICAL CARE, AND
 THOUSANDS OF PRIVATELY FUNDED
 CHARITIES PROVIDED HEALTH
 SERVICES FOR THE PO0
 RON PAUL
 TURNING
 POINT USA
<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://bushmeat.tumblr.com/" title="bushmeat">bushmeat</a> said:</p><blockquote><p>When they tell you how ghastly socialised healthcare is, remember what they are saying is absolute bullshit

<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253</a></p></blockquote><p>If I had a nickel every time some leftist moron linked to a World Healthcare Organization or Commonwealth Fund study, well, I would have a shitload of nickels.</p><p>Since my previous source’s website is currently down–<a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/142352613032/that-red-guy-montypla-weaselwonderworld">which I’ve used in the past</a> to slap this idiotic notion that other countries’ healthcare systems are somehow superior the US’s private system–I’ll instead point to this <a href="https://object.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa654.pdf">other great explanation</a> by the folks over at CATO on why this pathetic claim is always made by these left-wing think-tanks:</p><blockquote><p><i>

The debate over how to reform America’s
health care sector often involves comparisons
between the United States and other countries,
and with good reason. Looking at other
countries can help us learn which policies, if
any, to emulate, and which to avoid. </i></p><p><i>There have been many attempts at international
health care system comparisons.Among
the most influential are the World Health Report
2000 published by the World Health Organization, several studies published by the
Commonwealth Fund, and individual measures
such as infant mortality and “mortality
amenable to health care.” Generally in these
studies, the United States performs poorly in
comparison to Europe, Australia, and Japan.
Therefore, scholars often use the studies to
argue for adding even more government regulations
to our already highly regulated health
care system. </i></p><p><i>However, these studies suffer from several
problems. First, they often rely on unadjusted
aggregate data—such as life expectancy, or
mortality from heart disease—that can be
affected by many non–health care factors,
including nutrition, exercise, and even crime
rates. Second,they often use process measures,
such as how many patients have received a pap
smear or mammogram in the past three years.
Process measures tell us what doctors do, but
provide only an indirect measure of doctors’
productivity. Third, some of these studies
inappropriately incorporate their own biases
about financing in their statistics, which
makes market-driven health systems appear
worse even if their outcomes are similar or better. </i></p><p><i>An additional limitation of these studies
is the omission of any measure of innovation.
None of the best-known studies factor in the
contribution of various countries to the
advances that have come to characterize the
current practice of health care in the developed
world. </i></p><p><i>Every single health care test or treatment
must be invented at some point. We would be
living in a different world today were it not
for the remarkable genius and hard work of
health care inventors in the past, as well as
investments from government health agencies
and pharmaceutical and medical device
companies. The health care issues commonly
considered most important today—controlling
costs and covering the uninsured—
arguably should be regarded as secondary to
innovation, inasmuch as a treatment must
first be invented before its costs can be
reduced and its use extended to everyone.

</i><br/></p></blockquote><p>Furthermore, from another Glen Whitman <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp101.pdf">article</a>:</p><blockquote><p><i>

Those who cite the WHO rankings typically present them as an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially on a number of underlying assumptions- some of them logically incoherent, some characterized by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone shares.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

The WHO health care rankings result
from an index of health-related statistics. As
with any index, it is important to consider
how it was constructed, as the construction
affects the results.

</i><br/></p><p><i>

There is good reason to account for the
quality of care received by a country’s worst-off
or poorest citizens. Yet the Health Distribution
and Responsiveness Distribution factors
do not do that.Instead, they measure relative
differences in quality, without regard to the
absolute level of quality. To account for the
quality of care received by the worst-off, the
index could include a factor that measures
health among the poor, or a health care system’s
responsiveness to the poor. This would,
in essence, give greater weight to the well-being
of the worst off.  Alternatively, a separate health
performance index could be constructed for
poor households or members of disadvantaged
minorities. These approaches would
surely have problems of their own, but they
would at least be focused on the absolute level
of health care quality, which should be the
paramount concern.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

The WHO rankings, by purporting to
measure the efficacy of health care systems,
implicitly take all differences in health outcomes
not explained by spending or literacy
and attribute them entirely to health care system
performance. Nothing else, from tobacco
use to nutrition to sheer luck, is taken into
account. </i></p><p><i>To some extent, the exclusion of other
variables is simply the result of inadequacies
in the data. It is difficult to get information
on all relevant factors, and even more difficult
to account for their expected effects on
health. But some factors are deliberately
excluded by the WHO analysis on the basis of
paternalistic assumptions about the proper
role of health systems. An earlier paper laying
out the WHO methodological framework
asserts, “Problems such as tobacco consumption,
diet, and unsafe sexual activity must be
included in an assessment of health system
performance.” </i></p><p><i>In other words, the WHO approach holds
health systems responsible not just for treating
lung cancer, but for preventing smoking
in the first place; not just for treating heart
disease, but for getting people to exercise and
lay off the fatty foods.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

Second, the WHO approach fails to consider
people’s willingness to trade off health
against other values. Some people are happy
to give up a few potential months or even
years of life in exchange for the pleasures of
smoking, eating, having sex, playing sports,
and so on. The WHO approach, rather than
taking the public’s preferences as given,
deems some preferences better than others
(and then praises or blames the health system
for them). </i></p><p><i>A superior (though still imperfect) approach
would take people’s health-related
behavior as given, and then ask which health
systems do the best job of dealing with whatever
health conditions arise.<br/></i></p></blockquote><p>In other words, its a bunch of meaningless cherry-picked measurements framed in a way to make the private system appear terrible in order to push for more socialized medicine.  </p><p>Despite all of it’s flaws, which are usually thanks to government market intervention, the United States still has the best health care system on the entire goddamn planet per capita.  It’s most likely that the life-saving equipment and procedures that are used in other hellholes using slave healthcare to save lives are thanks to us.  </p><p>You’re welcome.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b97a460c917c68f3900de0bc46e50c59/tumblr_inline_owpcxquafE1r1jtxd_540.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbl...

efficacy: DID YOU KNOW? IG:@CONSCIOUSVIBRANCY Your brain can literally be on the same wavelength as someone else's. Brain coupling: scientific recordings of one person's brain waves synchronized with another person they are in an intimate relationship with. Generally, this happens between best friends or romantic couples. FMRI scans on couples show scientific evidence that emotions such as joy, serenity and enthusiasm are picked up and enhanced in the presence of someone you feel close to. In other words, the electromagnetic signal produced by your heart is registered in the brain waves of people who are around you. When two people are having a conversation or listening to the same story, it makes sense that they’d be using similar parts of their brain, but the question is just how similar this activation is. Drexel and Princeton Universities teamed up recently to further explore this issue using a newer technology, hoping to prove its efficacy. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a functional brain imaging technique, researchers sought to find out what happens when two people communicate and how to possibly improve face to face communication. In this study, experimental subjects wore an fNIRS headband which measured their neural activity while they engaged in conversation with one another. This in itself is pretty great as other imaging techniques like fMRI that measure blood flow to brain regions require people to lie down in a noisy machine, which is not at all conducive to personal conversation. During the experiment, subjects listened to a story in their native language while their futuristic headbands measured activity in prefrontal and parietal areas. These regions were targeted because they’re largely responsible for higher order processing involved with relating to others, an important piece of any communicative effort. When they examined the recordings, the researchers saw that brain activity of the listener heavily resembled that of the speaker after a delay. This copy-cat effect, however, was not observed when subjects didn’t understand the communicator, for example when the speaker only communicated in Turkish but the listener was only fluent in English. With the results from fNIRS, the experimenters found that the fNIRS recordings correlated quite closely with fMRI results of a similar experiment. Consciousvibrancy Source: http:-sites.bu.edu-ombs-2017-03-01-brain-synching-what-happens-when-you-converse-with-other-people-
efficacy: DID YOU KNOW?
 IG:@CONSCIOUSVIBRANCY
 Your brain can literally be on the same wavelength as someone
 else's. Brain coupling: scientific recordings of one person's brain
 waves synchronized with another person they are in an intimate
 relationship with. Generally, this happens between best friends or
 romantic couples.
FMRI scans on couples show scientific evidence that emotions such as joy, serenity and enthusiasm are picked up and enhanced in the presence of someone you feel close to. In other words, the electromagnetic signal produced by your heart is registered in the brain waves of people who are around you. When two people are having a conversation or listening to the same story, it makes sense that they’d be using similar parts of their brain, but the question is just how similar this activation is. Drexel and Princeton Universities teamed up recently to further explore this issue using a newer technology, hoping to prove its efficacy. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a functional brain imaging technique, researchers sought to find out what happens when two people communicate and how to possibly improve face to face communication. In this study, experimental subjects wore an fNIRS headband which measured their neural activity while they engaged in conversation with one another. This in itself is pretty great as other imaging techniques like fMRI that measure blood flow to brain regions require people to lie down in a noisy machine, which is not at all conducive to personal conversation. During the experiment, subjects listened to a story in their native language while their futuristic headbands measured activity in prefrontal and parietal areas. These regions were targeted because they’re largely responsible for higher order processing involved with relating to others, an important piece of any communicative effort. When they examined the recordings, the researchers saw that brain activity of the listener heavily resembled that of the speaker after a delay. This copy-cat effect, however, was not observed when subjects didn’t understand the communicator, for example when the speaker only communicated in Turkish but the listener was only fluent in English. With the results from fNIRS, the experimenters found that the fNIRS recordings correlated quite closely with fMRI results of a similar experiment. Consciousvibrancy Source: http:-sites.bu.edu-ombs-2017-03-01-brain-synching-what-happens-when-you-converse-with-other-people-

FMRI scans on couples show scientific evidence that emotions such as joy, serenity and enthusiasm are picked up and enhanced in the prese...

efficacy: Jackie Kucinich @JFKucinich Follow Trump just appointed an anti-vaxxer to chair a commission on vaccine safety. Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions. Dan Diamond Follow @ddiamond Any effort to vaccination is terrible. The measles vaccine alone has saved 20M kids lives since 2000, per UNICEF Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions. Dan Diamond Ф @ddiamond Follow CDC says that for kids born in U.S. between 1994-2013, vaccines prevented 322 million illnesses saved nearly $1.4 trillion in costs Donald J. Trump < @realDonaldTrump Follow Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases! 8:35 AM-28 Mar 2014 10,256 7,748 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Follow With autism being way up, what do we have to lose by having doctors give small dose vaccines vs. big pump doses into those tiny bodies? 9:50 AM-28 Mar 2014 270 31 1 geobrarian: isometriclove: warmblackrooster: aspiringdoctors: closet-keys: drfitzmonster: the-future-now: Trump picks anti-vaxxer to lead commission on vaccine safety Trump on Tuesday asked a prominent anti-vaxxer to lead a commission on vaccine safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Bobby Kennedy, said he agreed to lead the commission, which will seek to ensure there is “scientific integrity in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects,” Kennedy said. Kennedy believes vaccines have led to a rise in autism, a claim that’s been debunked by doctors and scientists. Kennedy told reporters Tuesday that Trump “has some doubts about the current vaccine policies.” Read more follow @the-future-now 50+ million are going to lose healthcare and then they’re going to weaken herd-immunity and create a spike in illness we haven’t seen in decades.  Oh my god I’m having a hard time articulating my thoughts right now but as an autistic woman, I am begging my allistic (non-autistic) friends and their followers to read this and pass it on. this isn’t anything new, we’ve been dealing with antivaxxers for years, but I’m terrified seeing that monster act like my neurotype makes me a walking bubonic plague. the world already thinks I shouldn’t exist as it is. this cannot be allowed to stand. There is 0 credible evidence to this. The man who did so was revoked of his license when it was revealed he was paid by people with alternative autism “treatments” to forge the evidence.None of this is even credible. Save your fucking kids from preventable illnesses. Ok, so.  My Dad had polio.  He caught it in 1944, before the vaccine was invented and spent the next two years in an iron lung paralyzed from the neck down.  He regained limited use of his body from the sternum up.  He used a wheelchair and a back brace for the rest of his life.  He couldn’t physically laugh because of the paralyzed muscles in his diaphragm.  His legs atrophied and eventually his knees fused in a bent position.  By the end of his life he was in agony most days and the actual cause of his death was CO2 poisoning because his upper chest muscles were no longer able to expel the CO2 in his lungs.   There will never be a good enough reason to reduce herd immunity for things like this.  To throw away the gift of vaccines.
efficacy: Jackie Kucinich
 @JFKucinich
 Follow
 Trump just appointed an anti-vaxxer to chair a
 commission on vaccine safety.
 Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson
 Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine
 safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions.

 Dan Diamond
 Follow
 @ddiamond
 Any effort to vaccination is terrible. The
 measles vaccine alone has saved 20M kids
 lives since 2000, per UNICEF
 Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson
 Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine
 safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions.

 Dan Diamond Ф
 @ddiamond
 Follow
 CDC says that for kids born in U.S. between
 1994-2013, vaccines
 prevented 322 million illnesses
 saved nearly $1.4 trillion in costs

 Donald J. Trump <
 @realDonaldTrump
 Follow
 Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with
 massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and
 changes - AUTISM. Many such cases!
 8:35 AM-28 Mar 2014
 10,256
 7,748
 Donald J. Trump
 @realDonaldTrump
 Follow
 With autism being way up, what do we have to lose by
 having doctors give small dose vaccines vs. big pump
 doses into those tiny bodies?
 9:50 AM-28 Mar 2014
 270
 31 1
geobrarian:

isometriclove:

warmblackrooster:

aspiringdoctors:

closet-keys:

drfitzmonster:

the-future-now:

Trump picks anti-vaxxer to lead commission on vaccine safety
Trump on Tuesday asked a prominent anti-vaxxer to lead a commission on vaccine safety.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Bobby Kennedy, said he agreed 
to lead the commission, which will seek to ensure there is “scientific 
integrity in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy believes vaccines have led to a rise in autism, a claim that’s been debunked by doctors and scientists. 

Kennedy told reporters Tuesday that Trump “has some doubts about the current vaccine policies.” Read more
follow @the-future-now



50+ million are going to lose healthcare and then they’re going to weaken herd-immunity and create a spike in illness we haven’t seen in decades. 


Oh my god

I’m having a hard time articulating my thoughts right now but
as an autistic woman, I am begging my allistic (non-autistic) friends and their followers to read this and pass it on. this isn’t anything new, we’ve been dealing with antivaxxers for years, but I’m terrified seeing that monster act like my neurotype makes me a walking bubonic plague. the world already thinks I shouldn’t exist as it is. this cannot be allowed to stand.

There is 0 credible evidence to this. The man who did so was revoked of his license when it was revealed he was paid by people with alternative autism “treatments” to forge the evidence.None of this is even credible. Save your fucking kids from preventable illnesses.

Ok, so.  My Dad had polio.  He caught it in 1944, before the vaccine was invented and spent the next two years in an iron lung paralyzed from the neck down.  He regained limited use of his body from the sternum up.  He used a wheelchair and a back brace for the rest of his life.  He couldn’t physically laugh because of the paralyzed muscles in his diaphragm.  His legs atrophied and eventually his knees fused in a bent position.  By the end of his life he was in agony most days and the actual cause of his death was CO2 poisoning because his upper chest muscles were no longer able to expel the CO2 in his lungs.  
There will never be a good enough reason to reduce herd immunity for things like this.  To throw away the gift of vaccines.

geobrarian: isometriclove: warmblackrooster: aspiringdoctors: closet-keys: drfitzmonster: the-future-now: Trump picks anti-vaxxer...

efficacy: TAP TO MAKE THE HEART BEAT 4biddenknowledge ॐ What is the spiritual science behind the primordial sound of OM? ॐ | The sign of OM is the sign of Hinduism. It is the first and foremost of all mantras. This mantra is the sound body of consciousness. OM is considered as the sound of cosmicenergy and contains all the sounds in itself. The spiritual efficacy of OM is heard, not by the ears but by the heart . It surcharges the innermost being of man with vibrations of the highest reality. The frequency of OM is 7.83 Hz , which in inaudible to the ear, as the human ear of a 2 strand DNA human being like you and me , cannot discern sounds of frequency less than 20 hertz.") We can hear only the harmonics. HARMONICS OF BASIC OM FREQUENCY 7.83 HZ , INNER EAR METHOD FOR BENDING SPACE TIME, Chanting OM produces a sonorous vibration like the buzz of a mighty transformer. The vibrations produce scalarwaves which calms the mind. It produces an antigravity effect on water, due to the science of cymatics , and your body is mostly water. The anuswaram ( nasal sound ) MMMM humming boosts the production of Nitric oxide in the body. This was known to Indians and documented 7000 years ago. OM opens up quantum tunneling, where the wormholes do NOT have a restriction of speed of light. The secrets of this universe are contained in energy , frequency and vibration. Chanting OM raises your vibration to a higher consciousness, and it clears the channel for intuition. From the conch OM frequency 7.83 Hz emanates. Just before the Mahabharata war, 6000 year ago, LordKrishna blew on his Panchajanya shankh, striking terror in the Kaurava camp hearts. This sound went all around the world like a soliton carrier wave , using the ionosphere as a wave guide. The sound of the conch with its inherent 7.83 hertz can be heard by the ears ( in harmonics ) and well as the human heart . If you make the sound of OM in front of a drop of liquid, it will transform itself into a SriYantra which is very specific visual form which is symmetrical and also holographic, in that every bit of it contains all of it. 4biddenknowledge
efficacy: TAP TO MAKE THE
 HEART BEAT
 4biddenknowledge
ॐ What is the spiritual science behind the primordial sound of OM? ॐ | The sign of OM is the sign of Hinduism. It is the first and foremost of all mantras. This mantra is the sound body of consciousness. OM is considered as the sound of cosmicenergy and contains all the sounds in itself. The spiritual efficacy of OM is heard, not by the ears but by the heart . It surcharges the innermost being of man with vibrations of the highest reality. The frequency of OM is 7.83 Hz , which in inaudible to the ear, as the human ear of a 2 strand DNA human being like you and me , cannot discern sounds of frequency less than 20 hertz.") We can hear only the harmonics. HARMONICS OF BASIC OM FREQUENCY 7.83 HZ , INNER EAR METHOD FOR BENDING SPACE TIME, Chanting OM produces a sonorous vibration like the buzz of a mighty transformer. The vibrations produce scalarwaves which calms the mind. It produces an antigravity effect on water, due to the science of cymatics , and your body is mostly water. The anuswaram ( nasal sound ) MMMM humming boosts the production of Nitric oxide in the body. This was known to Indians and documented 7000 years ago. OM opens up quantum tunneling, where the wormholes do NOT have a restriction of speed of light. The secrets of this universe are contained in energy , frequency and vibration. Chanting OM raises your vibration to a higher consciousness, and it clears the channel for intuition. From the conch OM frequency 7.83 Hz emanates. Just before the Mahabharata war, 6000 year ago, LordKrishna blew on his Panchajanya shankh, striking terror in the Kaurava camp hearts. This sound went all around the world like a soliton carrier wave , using the ionosphere as a wave guide. The sound of the conch with its inherent 7.83 hertz can be heard by the ears ( in harmonics ) and well as the human heart . If you make the sound of OM in front of a drop of liquid, it will transform itself into a SriYantra which is very specific visual form which is symmetrical and also holographic, in that every bit of it contains all of it. 4biddenknowledge

ॐ What is the spiritual science behind the primordial sound of OM? ॐ | The sign of OM is the sign of Hinduism. It is the first and foremo...

efficacy: Jackie Kucinich @JFKucinich Follow Trump just appointed an anti-vaxxer to chair a commission on vaccine safety. Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions. Dan Diamond Follow @ddiamond Any effort to vaccination is terrible. The measles vaccine alone has saved 20M kids lives since 2000, per UNICEF Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions. Dan Diamond Ф @ddiamond Follow CDC says that for kids born in U.S. between 1994-2013, vaccines prevented 322 million illnesses saved nearly $1.4 trillion in costs Donald J. Trump < @realDonaldTrump Follow Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases! 8:35 AM-28 Mar 2014 10,256 7,748 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Follow With autism being way up, what do we have to lose by having doctors give small dose vaccines vs. big pump doses into those tiny bodies? 9:50 AM-28 Mar 2014 270 31 1 veritablefacets: the-future-now: Trump picks anti-vaxxer to lead commission on vaccine safety Trump on Tuesday asked a prominent anti-vaxxer to lead a commission on vaccine safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Bobby Kennedy, said he agreed to lead the commission, which will seek to ensure there is “scientific integrity in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects,” Kennedy said. Kennedy believes vaccines have led to a rise in autism, a claim that’s been debunked by doctors and scientists. Kennedy told reporters Tuesday that Trump “has some doubts about the current vaccine policies.” Read more follow @the-future-now I wish this shit would surprise me… The truth, science, and reason are no longer relevant in this dystopian reality.
efficacy: Jackie Kucinich
 @JFKucinich
 Follow
 Trump just appointed an anti-vaxxer to chair a
 commission on vaccine safety.
 Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson
 Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine
 safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions.

 Dan Diamond
 Follow
 @ddiamond
 Any effort to vaccination is terrible. The
 measles vaccine alone has saved 20M kids
 lives since 2000, per UNICEF
 Ginger Gibson @GingerGibson
 Robert F Kennedy JR says Trump asked him to chair a commission on vaccine
 safety and he agreed. Has lobbied for vaccine exemptions.

 Dan Diamond Ф
 @ddiamond
 Follow
 CDC says that for kids born in U.S. between
 1994-2013, vaccines
 prevented 322 million illnesses
 saved nearly $1.4 trillion in costs

 Donald J. Trump <
 @realDonaldTrump
 Follow
 Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with
 massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and
 changes - AUTISM. Many such cases!
 8:35 AM-28 Mar 2014
 10,256
 7,748
 Donald J. Trump
 @realDonaldTrump
 Follow
 With autism being way up, what do we have to lose by
 having doctors give small dose vaccines vs. big pump
 doses into those tiny bodies?
 9:50 AM-28 Mar 2014
 270
 31 1
veritablefacets:

the-future-now:
Trump picks anti-vaxxer to lead commission on vaccine safety
Trump on Tuesday asked a prominent anti-vaxxer to lead a commission on vaccine safety.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Bobby Kennedy, said he agreed 
to lead the commission, which will seek to ensure there is “scientific 
integrity in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy believes vaccines have led to a rise in autism, a claim that’s been debunked by doctors and scientists. 

Kennedy told reporters Tuesday that Trump “has some doubts about the current vaccine policies.” Read more
follow @the-future-now

I wish this shit would surprise me…

The truth, science, and reason are no longer relevant in this dystopian reality.

veritablefacets: the-future-now: Trump picks anti-vaxxer to lead commission on vaccine safety Trump on Tuesday asked a prominent anti-va...

efficacy: words to use more often loveh proper beautiful sine absurd plump efficacy omt fetcbing enOrM discombobulate intrude cleave abominable balderdash eam eminent accurac aiesS nigue peckish skedaddle thrall precions hullaballoo scrumptioussome deligbtful breathtaking dandy squabble worth solitude enthralled mayhap evolive secure urpose contemplatebebalf thankful grwesome resioe taught resplendent audaci embrace likelj inflection pompous tangible superfions great (in sigem gumption dictate present regardless mim&c reatm sleep)y Said is dead but howdid they say it? * Normally? Happily? ?ossily? stated quaked comman ded ke laughed joked sissled sang spo remarked stammered stuttered sulped Angrily? dictated added Sadly? As a question? asked inquired requested begsed smirked marveled chimed hissed bawled whined Quietly? mumbled ttered whispered Silently? thundered Asan answer? Loudly? snapped shouted belted yelled reamed exclaimed barked ranted srunted replied scr acknowledged explained bellowed called Go Into The Story http://gointothestory.blcklst.com/ List Compiled by Alan Donahue Active Verb Cheatsheet 90 Words for "Looks" admires attends beams beholds cases casts catches checks considers contemplates coos disregards double take evil eyes eyeballs eyes feast one's eyes feasts flashes flicks focuses ganders gapes gawks gawps gazes gets a load of glances glimpses glints gloats glowers goggles heeds hunts ignores inspects keeps watch leches leers locks on look-sees looks out make sheeps eyes marks misses notes notices observes ogles once-overs overlooks peeks peeps peers perves pores over pries prospects radiates reads econnaissances reflects regards reviews scans scopes scouts scrutinizes sees sight sees sights slants sparkles sparks speculates spies spots squints stares studies surveys swivels takes a gander takes in the sights tends trolls watches witnesses Sho wing motions Feelinąs NOT NERVOuS EMBARRASSED hands Shaking tapping hans lushina Him Knees like rubber bifind bottom lip hanging ic heaty fast breathingl Stutterin ars covering mouth wirth hand butterPlies in stomach holding back Te rolna eyes heart poundina lump in your throat stomac whimperina hlips aying With hair red in the face briant red face miling face hands on hips sweat on face /back eyes Wide open mouth risin umping up and dowr Jaw/hands clenched Hanning self wth handtomers of moving slow veins poppin dark squi rted ves banting for breath aughing, giagling HOCKED mouth wide open droopy red eyes Shiverin eyes popping open hands covering mouth tryina to Kcep eyes oping sel Jumping ste ppng bac awn nd ubbing hands tuwether Slouching in Chair blowing on hands aspinq for dir eaning hands on head seeing bregth m the air EXC blushi lookina down peaking softy tears in eyes mouth Wide open trembling lips heart poundin hanging head low umping up and down arms trosse ra res oi ls fall etclapping or clasping hands es lowl eyes wide open belleresources-blog: :) 
efficacy: words to use more often
 loveh
 proper
 beautiful
 sine
 absurd
 plump
 efficacy
 omt
 fetcbing
 enOrM
 discombobulate
 intrude
 cleave
 abominable
 balderdash
 eam
 eminent
 accurac
 aiesS
 nigue
 peckish
 skedaddle
 thrall
 precions
 hullaballoo
 scrumptioussome
 deligbtful
 breathtaking
 dandy
 squabble
 worth
 solitude
 enthralled
 mayhap
 evolive
 secure
 urpose
 contemplatebebalf
 thankful
 grwesome
 resioe
 taught
 resplendent
 audaci
 embrace
 likelj
 inflection
 pompous
 tangible
 superfions
 great (in sigem
 gumption
 dictate
 present
 regardless
 mim&c
 reatm
 sleep)y

 Said is dead
 but howdid they say it? *
 Normally?
 Happily?
 ?ossily?
 stated
 quaked
 comman
 ded
 ke
 laughed
 joked
 sissled
 sang
 spo
 remarked
 stammered
 stuttered
 sulped
 Angrily?
 dictated
 added
 Sadly?
 As a question?
 asked
 inquired
 requested
 begsed
 smirked
 marveled
 chimed
 hissed
 bawled
 whined
 Quietly?
 mumbled
 ttered
 whispered
 Silently?
 thundered
 Asan answer? Loudly?
 snapped
 shouted
 belted
 yelled
 reamed
 exclaimed
 barked
 ranted
 srunted
 replied
 scr
 acknowledged
 explained
 bellowed
 called

 Go Into The Story
 http://gointothestory.blcklst.com/
 List Compiled by Alan Donahue
 Active Verb Cheatsheet
 90 Words for "Looks"
 admires
 attends
 beams
 beholds
 cases
 casts
 catches
 checks
 considers
 contemplates
 coos
 disregards
 double take
 evil eyes
 eyeballs
 eyes
 feast one's eyes
 feasts
 flashes
 flicks
 focuses
 ganders
 gapes
 gawks
 gawps
 gazes
 gets a load of
 glances
 glimpses
 glints
 gloats
 glowers
 goggles
 heeds
 hunts
 ignores
 inspects
 keeps watch
 leches
 leers
 locks on
 look-sees
 looks out
 make sheeps eyes
 marks
 misses
 notes
 notices
 observes
 ogles
 once-overs
 overlooks
 peeks
 peeps
 peers
 perves
 pores over
 pries
 prospects
 radiates
 reads
 econnaissances
 reflects
 regards
 reviews
 scans
 scopes
 scouts
 scrutinizes
 sees
 sight sees
 sights
 slants
 sparkles
 sparks
 speculates
 spies
 spots
 squints
 stares
 studies
 surveys
 swivels
 takes a gander
 takes in the sights
 tends
 trolls
 watches
 witnesses

 Sho
 wing motions Feelinąs
 NOT
 NERVOuS EMBARRASSED
 hands Shaking tapping hans lushina Him
 Knees like rubber bifind bottom lip hanging ic
 heaty fast breathingl Stutterin
 ars
 covering mouth wirth hand butterPlies in stomach holding back Te
 rolna eyes
 heart poundina lump in your throat stomac
 whimperina
 hlips
 aying With hair
 red in the face briant red face miling face
 hands on hips sweat on face /back eyes Wide open
 mouth risin
 umping up and dowr
 Jaw/hands clenched Hanning self wth handtomers of
 moving slow
 veins poppin
 dark squi rted ves banting for breath aughing, giagling
 HOCKED
 mouth wide open droopy red eyes Shiverin
 eyes popping open
 hands covering mouth tryina to Kcep eyes oping sel
 Jumping ste ppng bac
 awn
 nd
 ubbing hands tuwether
 Slouching in Chair blowing on hands
 aspinq for dir eaning hands on head seeing bregth m the air
 EXC
 blushi
 lookina down
 peaking softy
 tears in eyes mouth Wide open
 trembling lips heart poundin
 hanging head low umping up and down
 arms trosse
 ra
 res oi ls fall etclapping or clasping hands
 es lowl eyes wide open
belleresources-blog:

:) 

belleresources-blog: :)